Article ID: CBB867911612

Protection Motivation and Communication through Nanofood Labels: Improving Predictive Capabilities of Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Nanofoods (September 2018)

unapi

The development and use of nanotechnology in the food industry (nanofood) have grown steadily. While visions for nanofood suggest that the applications will improve quality and safety, they are also controversial for several reasons including potential health risks coupled with difficulty in assessing low-dosage nanoparticle risks as well as values-based objections. In recent years, debate over nanofoods has sparked inquiry into factors that predict public attitudes and purchase intentions. Such studies have investigated the roles of demographics and sociographics, value predispositions toward science and technology, preferences for natural products, trust in regulatory agencies, scientific knowledge, and media attention. This study assesses the role of each of these factors in shaping public attitudes toward nanofood and improves the predictive models by evaluating concepts from protection motivation theory. We find that incorporating threat and coping appraisals provides the best predictive models of public attitudes and intention to purchase nanofood products.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB867911612/

Similar Citations

Article Schleifer, David; (February 2013)
Categories count: Trans fat labeling as a technique of corporate governance (/isis/citation/CBB214363773/)

Article Leonie Dendler; Gaby-Fleur Böl; (July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment (/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)

Article Poonam Pandey; Aviram Sharma; (2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India (/isis/citation/CBB915250388/)

Article Engdahl, Emma; Lidskog, Rolf; (2014)
Risk, Communication and Trust: Towards an Emotional Understanding of Trust (/isis/citation/CBB001420113/)

Article Mike Michael; (November 2018)
On “Aesthetic Publics”: The Case of VANTAblack® (/isis/citation/CBB312320431/)

Article Lynch, Michael; (June 2013)
Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology (/isis/citation/CBB361114447/)

Article Kuchinskaya, Olga; (February 2013)
Twice invisible: Formal representations of radiation danger (/isis/citation/CBB984772144/)

Article Lauren Richter; Alissa Cordner; Phil Brown; (October 2018)
Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds (/isis/citation/CBB792947339/)

Article Lewenstein, Bruce V.; (2005)
Introduction---Nanotechnology and the Public (/isis/citation/CBB000660445/)

Article Cobb, Michael D.; (2005)
Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology (/isis/citation/CBB000631025/)

Book James B. McSwain; (2018)
Petroleum and Public Safety: Risk Management in the Gulf South, 1901-2015 (/isis/citation/CBB127804806/)

Article Cacciatore, Michael A.; Scheufele, Dietram A.; Corley, Elizabeth A.; (2011)
From Enabling Technology to Applications: The Evolution of Risk Perceptions about Nanotechnology (/isis/citation/CBB001034664/)

Article Fang, Xiang; (2014)
Local People's Understanding of Risk from Civil Nuclear Power in the Chinese Context (/isis/citation/CBB001420063/)

Article Yli-Kauhaluoma, Sari; Hänninen, Hannu; (2014)
Tale Taming Radioactive Fears: Linking Nuclear Waste Disposal to the “Continuum of the Good” (/isis/citation/CBB001420065/)

Article Hess, David J.; Coley, Jonathan S.; (2014)
Wireless Smart Meters and Public Acceptance: The Environment, Limited Choices, and Precautionary Politics (/isis/citation/CBB001420112/)

Article Sugiman, Toshio; (2014)
Lessons Learned from the 2011 Debacle of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant (/isis/citation/CBB001420061/)

Article Lisa M. PytlikZillig; Brittany Duncan; Sebastian Elbaum; Carrick Detweiler; (March 2018)
A Drone by Any Other Name: Purposes, End-User Trustworthiness, and Framing, but Not Terminology, Affect Public Support for Drones (/isis/citation/CBB947202008/)

Article Guston, David H.; (2014)
Building the Capacity for Public Engagement with Science in the United States (/isis/citation/CBB001420047/)

Authors & Contributors
Doorn, Neelke
Leonie Dendler
Taebi, Behnam
Brittany Duncan
Richter, Lauren
Pandey, Poonam
Journals
Public Understanding of Science
Social Studies of Science
Science, Technology and Human Values
Science Communication
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Publishers
Louisiana State University Press
Concepts
Public opinion
Risk
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Regulation
Nanotechnology
Public understanding of science
People
Rawls, John
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
Places
United States
Japan
Gulf of Mexico
Belarus
Southern states (U.S.)
Germany
Institutions
United States. Food and Drug Administration
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment