Steckle, Matthew (Author)
Rose, Philip (Advisor)
Hundleby, Catherine (Advisor)
Sandra Harding opposes her version of feminist standpoint theory to traditional ‘representationalist’ or ‘copy theories’ of truth. Yet her critics maintain that Harding’s standpoint theory retains an implicit representational epistemological framework that leaves space for global skepticism and pernicious relativism. Sharyn Clough and Shannon Sullivan argue that it is inconsistent for Harding to claim that (1) feminist standpoints will produce ‘less false’ theories than traditional androcentric scientific communities, and (2) that all perspectives (including the most socially privileged ones) are ‘enabled and limited’ by the social position from which they arise. Holding these two claims in tension with each other produces a problematic objectivist-relativist binary that undermines the emancipatory potential of Harding’s theory, they claim. It will be argued in this paper that these critical evaluations of Harding’s standpoint theory overlook the way in which Harding’s ‘less false’ claim already rests on a firm commitment to situated knowledge rather than a representationalist theory of truth. Reading Harding’s standpoint account through Bruno Latour’s ontology of knowledge, I argue that the aim of a standpoint is not merely to produce ‘alternative’ representations alongside dominant ones; rather it is to create spaces of critical tension with dominant uncritically accepted scientific theory and practice. Standpoints provide critical accounts of how dominant forms of knowing have constructed and deployed knowledge spaces, and provide opportunities for reconfiguring those spaces in ways that are more democratic and less oppressive. Thus, such standpoint-based accounts are candidates for producing less false theories not because they represent a ‘universal reality’ more clearly but because they, unlike modern Western science, emerge from marginal social positions that are less likely to deny the situated and local nature of all knowledge claims.
...More
Book
Bernd Irlenborn;
(2016)
Relativismus
(/isis/citation/CBB033027770/)
Article
Isabel Waidner;
(2018)
Christian Bök's Xenotext Experiment, Conceptual Writing and the Subject-of-No-Subjectivity: "Pink Faeries and Gaudy Baubles"
(/isis/citation/CBB611832394/)
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2010)
The Politics of Cognition: Genesis and Development of Ludwik Fleck's “Comparative Epistemology”
(/isis/citation/CBB001023239/)
Book
Clough, Sharyn;
(2003)
Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB000320297/)
Book
Giuseppe Boscarino;
(2016)
Le forme e i mutamenti della scienza
(/isis/citation/CBB208526052/)
Article
Lagesen, Vivian Anette;
(2012)
Reassembling Gender: Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the Making of the Technology in Gender
(/isis/citation/CBB001250753/)
Article
de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig;
(February 2011)
Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things
(/isis/citation/CBB272290328/)
Book
M. Seidel;
(2014)
Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique
(/isis/citation/CBB377519855/)
Book
Tsou, Jonathan Y.;
Padovani, Flavia;
Richardson, Alan W.;
(2015)
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB474125146/)
Book
Alex Broadbent;
(2019)
Philosophy of Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB569956645/)
Book
Lloyd P. Gerson;
(2013)
From Plato to Platonism
(/isis/citation/CBB685278391/)
Article
Katherina Kinzel;
(2017)
Wilhelm Windelband and the Problem of Relativism
(/isis/citation/CBB605899861/)
Article
Roelcke, Volker;
(2010)
Auf der Suche nach der Politik in der Wissensproduktion: Plädoyer für eine historischpolitische Epistemologie
(/isis/citation/CBB001021200/)
Article
Noemí Sanz Merino;
(2023)
Latour on Politics: Political Turn in Epistemology or Ontological Turn in Politics?
(/isis/citation/CBB609678817/)
Book
Stuart Sim;
(2019)
Post-Truth, Scepticism & Power
(/isis/citation/CBB034006765/)
Article
Henrik Sova;
(2021)
Assessment Relativism and the Truth-Predicate
(/isis/citation/CBB667623116/)
Article
Tamar Schneider;
(2020)
Can We Talk About Feminist Epistemic Values Beyond Gender? Lessons from the Gut Microbiome
(/isis/citation/CBB112503055/)
Thesis
Diaz, Sara P.;
(2012)
Gender, Race, and Science: A Feminista Analysis of Women of Color in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001567363/)
Book
Katherine McKittrick;
(2021)
Dear Science and Other Stories
(/isis/citation/CBB630320219/)
Article
Marisa G. Ruiz-Trejo;
Dau García-Dauder;
(2019)
Epistemic-corporeal workshops: Putting strong reflexivity into practice
(/isis/citation/CBB076650332/)
Be the first to comment!