Thesis ID: CBB862963001

Situating Feminist Standpoint Theory: Toward a Critical Ontology of Knowledge (2018)

unapi

Sandra Harding opposes her version of feminist standpoint theory to traditional ‘representationalist’ or ‘copy theories’ of truth. Yet her critics maintain that Harding’s standpoint theory retains an implicit representational epistemological framework that leaves space for global skepticism and pernicious relativism. Sharyn Clough and Shannon Sullivan argue that it is inconsistent for Harding to claim that (1) feminist standpoints will produce ‘less false’ theories than traditional androcentric scientific communities, and (2) that all perspectives (including the most socially privileged ones) are ‘enabled and limited’ by the social position from which they arise. Holding these two claims in tension with each other produces a problematic objectivist-relativist binary that undermines the emancipatory potential of Harding’s theory, they claim. It will be argued in this paper that these critical evaluations of Harding’s standpoint theory overlook the way in which Harding’s ‘less false’ claim already rests on a firm commitment to situated knowledge rather than a representationalist theory of truth. Reading Harding’s standpoint account through Bruno Latour’s ontology of knowledge, I argue that the aim of a standpoint is not merely to produce ‘alternative’ representations alongside dominant ones; rather it is to create spaces of critical tension with dominant uncritically accepted scientific theory and practice. Standpoints provide critical accounts of how dominant forms of knowing have constructed and deployed knowledge spaces, and provide opportunities for reconfiguring those spaces in ways that are more democratic and less oppressive. Thus, such standpoint-based accounts are candidates for producing less false theories not because they represent a ‘universal reality’ more clearly but because they, unlike modern Western science, emerge from marginal social positions that are less likely to deny the situated and local nature of all knowledge claims.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB862963001/

Similar Citations

Book Bernd Irlenborn; (2016)
Relativismus (/isis/citation/CBB033027770/)

Book Clough, Sharyn; (2003)
Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies (/isis/citation/CBB000320297/)

Book Giuseppe Boscarino; (2016)
Le forme e i mutamenti della scienza (/isis/citation/CBB208526052/)

Article Lagesen, Vivian Anette; (2012)
Reassembling Gender: Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the Making of the Technology in Gender (/isis/citation/CBB001250753/)

Article de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig; (February 2011)
Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things (/isis/citation/CBB272290328/)

Book M. Seidel; (2014)
Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique (/isis/citation/CBB377519855/)

Book Tsou, Jonathan Y.; Padovani, Flavia; Richardson, Alan W.; (2015)
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies (/isis/citation/CBB474125146/)

Book Alex Broadbent; (2019)
Philosophy of Medicine (/isis/citation/CBB569956645/)

Book Lloyd P. Gerson; (2013)
From Plato to Platonism (/isis/citation/CBB685278391/)

Article Katherina Kinzel; (2017)
Wilhelm Windelband and the Problem of Relativism (/isis/citation/CBB605899861/)

Article Noemí Sanz Merino; (2023)
Latour on Politics: Political Turn in Epistemology or Ontological Turn in Politics? (/isis/citation/CBB609678817/)

Book Stuart Sim; (2019)
Post-Truth, Scepticism & Power (/isis/citation/CBB034006765/)

Article Henrik Sova; (2021)
Assessment Relativism and the Truth-Predicate (/isis/citation/CBB667623116/)

Article Tamar Schneider; (2020)
Can We Talk About Feminist Epistemic Values Beyond Gender? Lessons from the Gut Microbiome (/isis/citation/CBB112503055/)

Thesis Diaz, Sara P.; (2012)
Gender, Race, and Science: A Feminista Analysis of Women of Color in Science (/isis/citation/CBB001567363/)

Book Katherine McKittrick; (2021)
Dear Science and Other Stories (/isis/citation/CBB630320219/)

Article Marisa G. Ruiz-Trejo; Dau García-Dauder; (2019)
Epistemic-corporeal workshops: Putting strong reflexivity into practice (/isis/citation/CBB076650332/)

Authors & Contributors
Merino, Noemí Sanz
Waidner, Isabel
García Dauder, Silvia
Sim, Stuart
Irlenborn, Bernd
Sova, Henrik
Journals
Social Studies of Science
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Perspectives on Science
Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Biological Theory
Publishers
Palgrave Macmillan
Springer
Rowman & Littlefield
Oxford University Press
Duke University Press
de Gruyter
Concepts
Epistemology
Relativism (philosophy)
Feminist analysis
Philosophy
Objectivity
Philosophy of science
People
Latour, Bruno
Bok, Christian
Young, Roger Arliner
Wu, Chien-Shiung
Windelband, Wilhelm
Plato
Time Periods
21st century
Early modern
Medieval
Ancient
Modern
Renaissance
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment