What did Frege take Russell to have proved? (2021)
In 1902 there arrived in Jena a letter from Russell laying out a proof that shattered Frege’s confidence in logicism, which is widely taken to be the doctrine according to which every truth of arithmetic is re-expressible without relevant loss as a provable truth about a purely logical object. Frege was persuaded that Russell had exposed a pathology in logicism, which faced him with the task of examining its symptoms, diagnosing its cause, assessing its seriousness, arriving at a treatment option, and making an estimate of future prospects. The symptom was the contradiction that had crept into naïve set theory in the form of the set that provably is and is not its own member. The diagnosis was that it is caused by Basic Law V of the Grundgesetze (Frege, In: Grundgesetze der Arithmetik: Begrifsschriftlich abgeleitet, Jena: Herman Pohle, 1893/1903. Translated into English as Basic Laws of Arithmetic, also edited by Philip A. Ebert and Marcus Rossberg, with Crispin Wright, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013). Triage answers the question, “How bad is it?” The answer was that the contradiction irreparably destroys the logicist project. The treatment option was nil. The disease was untreatable. In due course, the prognosis turned out to be that a scaled-down Fregean logic could have an honourable life as a theory inference for various domains of mathematical discourse, but not for domains containing the logical objects required for logicism. Since there aren’t such objects, there aren’t such domains. On the face of it, Frege’s logicist collapse is astonishing. Why wouldn’t he have repaired the fault in Law V and gone back to the business of bringing logicism to an assured realization? In the course of our reflections, we will have nice occasion to consider the good it might have done Frege to have booked some time with Aristotle had he been able to. By the time we’re finished, we’ll have cause to think that in the end the Russell might well have begged the question against Frege.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Chapter
Hylton, Peter;
(2010)
Frege and Russell
(/isis/citation/CBB001211659/)
Article
Korhonen, Anssi;
(2012)
Logic as a Science and Logic as a Theory: Remarks on Frege, Russell and the Logocentric Predicament
(/isis/citation/CBB001214125/)
Book
Ricketts, Tom;
Potter, Michael D.;
(2010)
The Cambridge Companion to Frege
(/isis/citation/CBB001211647/)
Book
Künne, Wolfgang;
(2010)
Die Philosophische Logik Gottlob Freges: ein Kommentar; mit den Texten des Vorworts zu Grundgesetze der Arithmetik und der Logischen Untersuchungen I--IV
(/isis/citation/CBB001210615/)
Book
Gandon, Sébastien;
(2012)
Russell's Unknown Logicism: A Study in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB001201203/)
Book
Linsky, Bernard;
(2011)
The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell's Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition
(/isis/citation/CBB001221112/)
Book
Grattan-Guiness, I.;
(2000)
Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870-1940: Logics, Set Theories and the Foundations of Mathematics from Cantor Through Russell to Gödel
(/isis/citation/CBB000102346/)
Chapter
Beaney, Michael;
(2006)
Frege and the Role of Historical Elucidation: Methodology and the Foundations of Mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB000800117/)
Article
Reck, Erich H.;
(2013)
Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism
(/isis/citation/CBB001212886/)
Essay Review
Klement, Kevin C.;
(2007--2008)
A New Century in the Life of a Paradox
(/isis/citation/CBB001567033/)
Article
Roy, Jean-Michel;
(2014)
“ There is no such thing as philosophic logic ”: Le problème de l'exception wittgensteinienne
(/isis/citation/CBB001551990/)
Article
Schirn, Matthias;
(2010)
On Translating Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik
(/isis/citation/CBB001210971/)
Chapter
Goldfarb, Warren;
(2010)
Frege's Conception of Logic
(/isis/citation/CBB001211649/)
Article
Mark Textor;
(2021)
Saying Something about a Concept: Frege on Statements of Number
(/isis/citation/CBB227044624/)
Article
Jan Vrhovski;
(2021)
On Infinitesimals and Indefinitely Cut Wooden Sticks: A Chinese Debate on ‘Mathematical Logic’ and Russell’s Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy from 1925
(/isis/citation/CBB635980926/)
Book
Grattan-Guinness, I.;
(2000)
The Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870-1940: Logics, Set Theories and the Foundations of Mathematics from Cantor through Russell to Gödel
(/isis/citation/CBB000111675/)
Book
Landini, Gregory;
(2010)
Russell
(/isis/citation/CBB001500071/)
Thesis
David E. Dunning;
(2020)
Writing the Rules of Reason: Notations in Mathematical Logic, 1847–1937
(/isis/citation/CBB517005733/)
Book
Guay, Alexandre;
(2012)
Autour des “Principia Mathematica” de Russell et Whitehead
(/isis/citation/CBB001211002/)
Essay Review
Stevens, Graham;
(2012)
The Scope of Logical Atomism
(/isis/citation/CBB001500070/)
Be the first to comment!