“A familiar logical triplet”: on Peirce’s grammar of representation and its relation to scientific inquiry (2021)
This essay focuses on Charles S. Peirce’s grammar of representation and its relevance for a logical conception of scientific inquiry. Closely relying on Peirce’s writings, one of his important trichotomies of signs will be discussed in particular: that distinguishing between substitutive signs, or “semes”, informational signs, or “phemes”, and persuasive signs, or “delomes”. According to Peirce, these three categories of signs result from an extension of the traditional division between “terms”, “propositions”, and “arguments” to all signs (not just symbols), understood as the foundational elements with and on which the scientific mind operates. It is shown that such an extended view of logic, conceived as a “semiotic”, or general doctrine of signs, is consistent with Peirce’s metaphysical views on truth and reality. Logic-as-semiotic, and its three corresponding branches of stecheotic, critic, and methodeutic, is thus conceived as a requisite normative trivium for the practice of scientific inquiry, whose purpose is to represent reality truthfully. In the end, we aim to remind that Peirce’s semiotic epistemology must necessarily be contextualized within the frame of his comprehensive philosophy of the scientific “settlement of opinion”.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Jean-Marie Chevalier;
(2016)
La logique est-elle une science de classification? Sur une crise de la classification dans la logique au xixe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB050633922/)
Article
Minghui Ma;
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen;
(2022)
Peirce’s Dragon-Head Logic (R 501, 1901)
(/isis/citation/CBB399393209/)
Chapter
Haaparanta, Leila;
(2009)
The Relations between Logic and Philosophy, 1874--1931
(/isis/citation/CBB001210347/)
Book
Forster, Paul;
(2011)
Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism
(/isis/citation/CBB001210617/)
Thesis
Favareau, Donald Francis;
(2004)
A Synthesis of Biosemiotics and Interaction Analysis for the Investigation ofExperience as a Natural Category
(/isis/citation/CBB001561917/)
Article
Marc Champagne;
(2019)
Diagrams and alien ways of thinking
(/isis/citation/CBB909895920/)
Article
Tugnoli Pàttaro, Sandra;
(2010)
Alle origini della semiotica: Lady Victoria Welby corrispondente di Charles S. Peirce
(/isis/citation/CBB001034882/)
Article
G. A. Kyriazis;
(2021)
On Peirce’s 1878 article ‘The probability of induction’: a conceptualistic appraisal
(/isis/citation/CBB796825571/)
Article
Claudia Cristalli;
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen;
(2021)
Abstraction and Generalization in the Logic of Science: Cases from Nineteenth-Century Scientific Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB855367059/)
Book
Landini, Gregory;
(2010)
Russell
(/isis/citation/CBB001500071/)
Book
Paola Cantù;
Georg Schiemer;
(2023)
Logic, Epistemology, and Scientific Theories - From Peano to the Vienna Circle
(/isis/citation/CBB170077918/)
Article
Zina B. Ward;
(2023)
Muscles or Movements? Representation in the Nascent Brain Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB741559709/)
Chapter
Hilpinen, Risto;
(2009)
Conditional and Possible Worlds: On C. S. Pierce's Conception of Conditionals and Modalities
(/isis/citation/CBB001210353/)
Article
Francesco Bellucci;
(2015)
Logic, Psychology, and Apperception: Charles S. Peirce and Johann F. Herbart
(/isis/citation/CBB115765207/)
Article
Campos, Daniel G.;
(2007)
Peirce on the Role of Poietic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning
(/isis/citation/CBB001023426/)
Article
Dea, Shannon;
(2006)
“Merely a veil over the living thought”: Mathematics and Logic in Peirce's Forgotten Spinoza Review
(/isis/citation/CBB001023424/)
Thesis
David E. Dunning;
(2020)
Writing the Rules of Reason: Notations in Mathematical Logic, 1847–1937
(/isis/citation/CBB517005733/)
Thesis
Agnes Bolinska;
(2015)
Epistemic Representation in Science and Beyond
(/isis/citation/CBB972082576/)
Chapter
Lara Piersanti;
(2000)
Vailati e Russell
(/isis/citation/CBB615477680/)
Chapter
Silvio Bozzi;
(2000)
Vailati e la logica
(/isis/citation/CBB852479099/)
Be the first to comment!