An oak is an oak, or not? Understanding and dealing with confusion and disagreement in biological classification (2023)
Vincent Cuypers (Author)
Reydon, Thomas A. C. (Author)
Biology and Philosophy
Volume: 38
Issue: 5
Pages: 39
Human interaction with the living world, in science and beyond, always involves classification. While it has been a long-standing scientific goal to produce a single all-purpose taxonomy of life to cater for this need, classificatory practice is often subject to confusion and disagreement, and many philosophers have advocated forms of classificatory pluralism. This entails that multiple classifications should be allowed to coexist, and that whichever classification is best, is context-dependent. In this paper, we discuss some practical consequences of classificatory pluralism, in particular with regard to how one is supposed to find the best classification for a given context. We do so by means of a case study concerning oaks, in particular the pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and the sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), two important putative species that present several classificatory challenges; and by applying one recent philosophical framework conceptualizing classification, the so-called Grounded Functionality Account (GFA) of (natural) kinds. We show how the GFA elucidates several issues related to oak classification and gives directions to optimize classificatory practices, and discuss some implications for scientific taxonomy.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Stijn Conix;
(2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications
Article
Brigandt, Ingo;
(2013)
Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims
Article
F. Boem;
E. Ratti;
M. Andreoletti;
G. Boniolo;
(2016)
Why genes are like lemons
Article
M. Polo Camacho;
(2020)
What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma
Article
Gregory J. Morgan;
(2016)
What is a virus species? Radical pluralism in viral taxonomy
Article
Patrick Forterre;
(2016)
To be or not to be alive: How recent discoveries challenge the traditional definitions of viruses and life
Article
Zina B. Ward;
(2023)
William Whewell, Cluster Theorist of Kinds
Article
Jardine, Nicholas;
(2001)
History and Philosophy of Taxonomy
Article
Pedroso, Makmiller;
(2012)
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
(2013)
Classifying Life, Reconstructing History and Teaching Diversity: Philosophical Issues in the Teaching of Biological Systematics and Biodiversity
Article
Lyons, Sherrie Lynne;
(2002)
Thomas Kuhn Is Alive and Well: The Evolutionary Relationships of Simple Life Forms--A Paradigm Under Siege?
Book
Richard A. Richards;
(2016)
Biological Classification: A Philosophical Introduction
Book
Maureen O'Malley;
(2014)
Philosophy of Microbiology
Article
Aaron Novick;
W. Ford Doolittle;
(2021)
‘Species’ without species
Article
Wilkins, John S.;
(2013)
Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds
Book
Dupré, John;
(2002)
Humans and Other Animals
Book
Ereshefsky, Marc;
(2000)
The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy
Article
Andrea Gambarotto;
Auguste Nahas;
(2022)
Teleology and the organism: Kant's controversial legacy for contemporary biology
Article
Leonardo Bich;
William Bechtel;
(2022)
Organization needs organization: Understanding integrated control in living organisms
Thesis
Devin Susanne Yagel Gouvêa;
(2021)
Essentially Dynamic Concepts and the Case of "Homology"
Be the first to comment!