Article ID: CBB846703326

Revisiting George Gaylord Simpson’s “The Role of the Individual in Evolution” (1941) (2021)

unapi

“The Role of the Individual in Evolution” is a prescient yet neglected 1941 work by the 20th century’s most important paleontologist, George Gaylord Simpson. In a curious intermingling of explanation and critique, Simpson engages questions that would become increasingly fundamental in modern biological theory and philosophy. Did individuality, adaptation, and evolutionary causation reside at more than one level: the cell, the organism, the genetically coherent reproductive group, the social group, or some combination thereof? What was an individual, anyway? In this introduction, we highlight two points in a wider historical context. First, recognizing the political context of Simpson’s writing profoundly deepens our understanding of the development of his science as the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis infused biology. Second, this story illuminates the emergence of debates around what would eventually come to be called multilevel selection theory. The organism-centered concept of biological individuality defended by Simpson is situated in relation to the then-emerging Synthesis, in which he was a renowned player, and also in relation to the views he opposed: the “metaphysical” ideas of paleontologists such as Henry Fairfield Osborn, who claimed that some evolutionary trends derived from potentialities already implanted in the germplasm; and the organicist ideas of Ralph W. Gerard and the Chicago School of ecologists, which he derided as all too congenial to totalitarianism. We find parallels between the ways that Simpson thought then about human individuality under totalitarianism and the way he thought about individuality in evolution; not that any causal relationship linked the two, but that commonalities of hierarchical structure exist between single entities and groups in both instances. We then trace the subsequent development of Simpson’s political and philosophical takes on the role of the individual in evolution through the 1960s and lightly sketch out the later fate of the organicist ideas of the Chicago School. Simpson’s paper, originally published in the Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences (31:1–20), is available as supplementary material in the online version of this article, as part of the "Classics in Biological Theory" collection.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB846703326/

Similar Citations

Book Beck, Naomi; (2014)
La gauche évolutionniste. Spencer et ses lecteurs en France et en Italie (/isis/citation/CBB001510177/)

Article Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda; Abigail Nieves Delgado; Jan Baedke; (2021)
Revisiting Hans Böker’s "Species Transformation Through Reconstruction: Reconstruction Through Active Reaction of Organisms" (1935) (/isis/citation/CBB806685409/)

Article Daniel J. Molter; (2022)
Bivalent Selection and Graded Darwinian Individuality (/isis/citation/CBB094549170/)

Book Scott Lidgard; Lynn K. Nyhart; (2017)
Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives (/isis/citation/CBB108117531/)

Book V. Tikhonov; (2010)
Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: the Beginnings (1880s-1910s) (/isis/citation/CBB388569044/)

Article Weikart, Richard; (2013)
The Role of Darwinism in Nazi Racial Thought (/isis/citation/CBB001202011/)

Book Roberto Rodríguez López; (2017)
Contra-Psicología. De las luchasantipsiquiátricas a la psicologización de la cultura (/isis/citation/CBB383223366/)

Article Gibson, Abraham H.; Kwapich, Christina L.; Lang, Martha; (2013)
The Roots of Multilevel Selection: Concepts of Biological Individuality in the Early Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB001420758/)

Thesis Paton, Miranda Vierra; (2008)
Vertebrate Paleontology and the Evolutionary Synthesis, 1894--1944 (/isis/citation/CBB001560692/)

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2021)
On the traces of the biosocial: Historicizing “plasticity” in contemporary epigenetics (/isis/citation/CBB820144208/)

Article Laurent, Nathanael; (2004)
Aux sources de la liberté dans l'ordre du vivant avec le concept de “dégénérescence” (/isis/citation/CBB000551122/)

Article Marco Tamborini; (2022)
Organic form and evolution: The morphological problem in twentieth-century italian biology (/isis/citation/CBB184611741/)

Book Trevor Pearce; (2020)
Pragmatism’s Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB241104150/)

Book Snait B. Gissis; Ehud Lamm; Ayelet Shavit; (2018)
Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences (/isis/citation/CBB644950362/)

Article Gregor P. Greslehner; (2020)
Not by structures alone: Can the immune system recognize microbial functions? (/isis/citation/CBB290841407/)

Article John Dupré; Stephan Guttinger; (2016)
Viruses as living processes (/isis/citation/CBB322148308/)

Authors & Contributors
Rodríguez López, Roberto
Fábregas-Tejeda, Alejandro
Suárez, Javier
Guttinger, Stephan
Chiapperino, Luca
Delgado, Abigail Nieves
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Revue des Questions Scientifiques
Journal of the History of Biology
History of Science
German Studies Review
Publishers
University of Chicago Press
Ediciones Dado
University of Alabama Press
The MIT Press
Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté
Brill
Concepts
Evolution
Philosophy of biology
Biology
Individuality
Science and politics
Science and society
People
Simpson, George Gaylord
Böker, Hans
Colosi, Giuseppe
Emerson, Alfred Edwards
Dobzhansky, Theodosius
Wallace, Alfred Russel
Time Periods
20th century, early
19th century
21st century
20th century
Places
Italy
Germany
England
United States
Japan
France
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment