Intellectual property law has been interacting with software for over sixty years. Despite this, the law in this area remains confused and uncertain: this is particularly evident in patent law. Focusing on U.S. patent law from the 1960s through to the mid-1970s, this article argues that a key reason for this confusion relates to the particular way that the subject matter was construed. While the early discussions about subject matter eligibility were framed in terms of the question “is software patentable?”, what was really at stake in these debates was the preliminary ontological question: what is software? Building on work that highlights the competing ways that software was construed by different parts of the information technology industry at the time, the article looks at the particular way that the law responded to these competing interpretations and how in so doing it laid the foundation for the confusion that characterizes the area. When engaging with new types of subject matter, patent law has consistently relied on the relevant techno-scientific communities not only to provide the law with a relatively clear understanding of the nature of the subject matter being considered; they have also provided the means to allow the law to describe, demarcate, and identify that new subject matter. The inherently divided nature of the nascent information technology industry meant that this was not possible. As a result, the law was forced to develop its own way of dealing with the would-be subject matter.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Con Díaz Gerardo;
(2019)
Software Rights: How Patent Law Transformed Software Development in America
Chapter
Samuelson, Pamela;
(2011)
The Strange Odyssey of Software Interfaces as Intellectual Property
Article
Yi, Doogab;
(2011)
Who Owns What? Private Ownership and the Public Interest in Recombinant DNA Technology in the 1970s
Thesis
Gerardo Con Diaz;
(2016)
Intangible Inventions: A History of Software Patenting in the United States, 1945-1985
Article
Pottage, Alain;
(October 2011)
Law machines: Scale models, forensic materiality and the making of modern patent law
Book
Matsuura, Jeffrey H.;
(2008)
Jefferson vs. the Patent Trolls: A Populist Vision of Intellectual Property Rights
Article
Mario Biagioli;
(2018)
Weighing Intellectual Property: Can We Balance the Social Costs and Benefits of Patenting?
Article
Mario Biagioli;
Marius Buning;
(2018)
“Technologies of the Law/ Law as a Technology”
Article
Ratcliff, Jessica;
(2012)
Art to Cheat the Common-Weale: Inventors, Projectors, and Patentees in English Satire, ca. 1630--70
Article
Hyo Yoon Kang;
(2018)
Ghosts of Inventions: Patent Law’s Digital Mediations
Book
Peter H. Christensen;
(2024)
Prior Art: Patents and the Nature of Invention in Architecture
Article
Balkin, Jack M.;
(2008)
The future of free expression in a digital age
Article
Coleman, Gabriella;
(2009)
Code is speech: Legal tinkering, expertise and protest among free and open software developers
Article
Ross, Andrew;
(2006)
Technology and Below-the-Line Labor in the Copyfight over Intellectual Property
Article
Jose Bellido;
(2023)
Patents In Miniature: The Effects of Microfilm as an Information Technology, 1938–68
Article
Mercelis, Joris;
(2012)
Leo Baekeland's Transatlantic Struggle for Bakelite: Patenting Inside and Outside of America
Article
Eda Kranakis;
(2019)
A Tale of Two Inventions: Monsanto, Biotechnology, and the Geography of Postmodern Science
Article
Greene, Jeremy A.;
(2013)
The Materiality of the Brand: Form, Function, and the Pharmaceutical Trademark
Article
Gerardo Con Diaz;
(2016)
Contested Ontologies of Software: The Story of Gottschalk v. Benson, 1963-1972
Article
Swanson, Kara;
(2007)
Biotech in Court: A Legal Lesson on the Unity of Science
Be the first to comment!