No-go theorems have played an important role in the development and assessment of scientific theories. They have stopped whole research programmes and have given rise to strong ontological commitments. Given the importance they obviously have had in physics and philosophy of physics and the huge amount of literature on the consequences of specific no-go theorems, there has been relatively little attention to the more abstract assessment of no-go theorems as a tool in theory development. We will here provide this abstract assessment of no-go theorems and conclude that the methodological implications one may draw from no-go theorems are in disagreement with the implications that have often been drawn from them in the history of science.
...More
Essay Review
Folse, Henry;
(2014)
[Essay review]
(/isis/citation/CBB001566824/)
Article
Eli I. Lichtenstein;
(2021)
(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice
(/isis/citation/CBB459964165/)
Article
Grantham, Todd A.;
(2000)
Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000110861/)
Book
Such, Jan;
(2004)
Multiformity of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000470006/)
Article
George Borg;
(2020)
On 'the application of science to science itself:' Chemistry, instruments, and the scientific labor process
(/isis/citation/CBB166777080/)
Article
Carus, A. W.;
(2010)
The Pragmatics of Scientific Knowledge: Howard Stein's Reshaping of Logical Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB001221444/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Book
Schickore, Jutta;
Steinle, Friedrich;
(2006)
Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction
(/isis/citation/CBB001033913/)
Article
Dyson, Freeman J.;
(2012)
Is Science Mostly Driven by Ideas or by Tools?
(/isis/citation/CBB001320450/)
Book
Sherrie L. Lyons;
(2020)
From Cells to Organisms: Re-envisioning Cell Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB991006382/)
Book
Hakob Barseghyan;
(2015)
The Laws of Scientific Change
(/isis/citation/CBB993218810/)
Chapter
Barker, Peter;
(2001)
Incommensurability and conceptual change during the Copernican Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000102728/)
Article
Ducheyne, Steffen;
(2009)
Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation
(/isis/citation/CBB001230068/)
Article
Jansson, Lina;
(2013)
Newton's “satis est”: A New Explanatory Role for Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB001213357/)
Article
Toader, Iulian D.;
(2013)
Concept Formation and Scientific Objectivity: Weyl's Turn against Husserl
(/isis/citation/CBB001320797/)
Article
Nugayev, Rinat M.;
(2013)
The Ptolemy-Copernicus Transition: Intertheoretic Context
(/isis/citation/CBB001320811/)
Article
Jan Baedke;
Christina Brandt;
(2022)
Between the Wars, Facing a Scientific Crisis: The Theoretical and Methodological Bottleneck of Interwar Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB174255369/)
Book
Losee, John;
(2005)
Theories on the Scrap Heap: Scientists and Philosophers on the Falsification, Rejection, and Replacement of Theories
(/isis/citation/CBB000550226/)
Article
Sturm, Thomas;
Mülberger, Annette;
(2012)
Crisis Discussions in Psychology---New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001221625/)
Book
Kwa, Chunglin;
(2011)
Styles of Knowing: A New History of Science from Ancient Times to the Present
(/isis/citation/CBB001033316/)
Be the first to comment!