Article ID: CBB820144208

On the traces of the biosocial: Historicizing “plasticity” in contemporary epigenetics (2021)

unapi

This paper builds upon historico-epistemological analyses of plasticity across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to distinguish among uses of this notion in contemporary epigenetics. By digging into this diachronic phase of plasticity thinking, we highlight a series of historically situated understandings and pragmatic dimensions of this notion. Specifically, our analysis describes four distinct phases in plasticity thinking across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: (1) plasticity as chemical modification of the body by its milieu; (2) plasticity as explanandum for the modifications of life’s ontogenetic and phylogenetic substrates; (3) plasticity as mechanistic process in need of distinct explanations in ontogeny and phylogeny; and (4) plasticity as responsive potential to perturbations of a complex genetic system of development. These four versions of plasticity provide, in turn, the opportunity to discern synchronically the uses of this notion in epigenetic biosciences. Fleshing out these historical ramifications animating the present, we argue, highlights a fundamental epistemological disagreement at the basis of the controversies around the definition, scope, and epistemic priorities of epigenetics: how to reconcile the contemporary epistemologies of plasticity that hold epigenetic marks capable of bearing the material impression of the environment with those grounded on a strong view of (epigenetic) plasticity as operating under genetic control? Parallel to this analysis of the epistemic space of plasticity from the nineteenth century onward, we show how these distinct modes of understanding body–environment relationships also constituted conceptual, representational, and experimental resources for understanding the entanglement between life as a biological and socially situated phenomenon. These different traces of biosocial thinking ante litteram, we conclude, provide a blueprint to interrogate today’s assumptions, values, (social) ontologies, and political leanings behind similar attempts to interpret the biosocial nexus that links our biology with its material, social, and cultural environments.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB820144208/

Similar Citations

Book Creath, Richard; Maienschein, Jane; (2000)
Biology and epistemology (/isis/citation/CBB000110573/)

Article Fareld, Victoria; (2006)
Wilhelm von Humboldts frihet som epigenetisk bildning (/isis/citation/CBB001220357/)

Book Minelli, Alessandro; Pradeu, Thomas; (2014)
Towards a Theory of Development (/isis/citation/CBB001510363/)

Article Wimsatt, William; (2001)
Richard Levins as Philosophical Revolutionary (/isis/citation/CBB000100683/)

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters (/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Charles T. Wolfe; (2018)
Introduction: Sketches of a Conceptual History of Epigenesis (/isis/citation/CBB013586652/)

Article O'Malley, Maureen A.; Müller-Wille, Staffan; (2010)
The Cell as Nexus: Connections between the History, Philosophy and Science of Cell Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001023956/)

Article Feder, Helena; (2010)
Introduction (/isis/citation/CBB001023609/)

Book Gillian Barker; (2015)
Beyond Biofatalism: Human Nature for an Evolving World (/isis/citation/CBB576244434/)

Book Robert, Jason Scott; (2004)
Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously (/isis/citation/CBB000770170/)

Book Sarkar, Sahotra; Plutynski, Anya; (2008)
A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000831085/)

Book Ayala, Francisco José; Arp, Robert; (2010)
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001032775/)

Thesis Hendrikse, Jesse Love; (2006)
Explanation and Inheritance (/isis/citation/CBB001561700/)

Thesis Robert, Jason Scott; (2000)
Taking development seriously: Toward a genuinely synthetic biology (/isis/citation/CBB001562184/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Francesca Merlin; (2017)
Epigenetics: A way to bridge the gap between biological fields (/isis/citation/CBB128944502/)

Authors & Contributors
Robert, Jason Scott
Nicoglou, Antonine
Arp, Robert
Ayala, Francisco José
Brandt, Christina
Brigandt, Ingo
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Biology and Philosophy
Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology
Journal of the History of Biology
Lychnos
Publishers
Cambridge University Press
University of Pittsburgh
Blackwell Publishers
Columbia University Press
Oxford University Press
Springer
Concepts
Biology
Developmental biology
Philosophy of biology
Evolution
Epigenetics
Epistemology
People
Darwin, Charles Robert
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
Mill, John Stuart
Spemann, Hans
Waddington, Conrad Hal
Levins, Richard
Time Periods
20th century
19th century
20th century, late
21st century
18th century
Places
Germany
United States
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment