Book ID: CBB819121205

Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation: A Controversial Legal Practice (2015)

unapi

Delafontaine, Ramses (Author)


Springer


Publication Date: 2015
Physical Details: 478
Language: English

Historian Ramses Delafontaine presents an engaging examination of a controversial legal practice: the historian as an expert judicial witness. This book focuses on tobacco litigation in the U.S. wherein 50 historians have witnessed in 314 court cases from 1986 to 2014. The author examines the use of historical arguments in court and investigates how a legal context influences historical narratives and discourse in forensic history. Delafontaine asserts that the courtroom is a performative and fact-making theatre. Nonetheless, he argues that the civic responsibility of the historian should not end at the threshold of the courtroom where history and truth hang in the balance.The book is divided into three parts featuring an impressive range of European and American case studies. The first part provides a theoretical framework on the issues which arise when history and law interact. The second part gives a comparative overview of European and American examples of forensic history. This part also reviews U.S. legal rules and case law on expert evidence, as well as extralegal challenges historians face as experts. The third part covers a series of tobacco-related trials. With remunerations as high as hundreds of thousands of dollars and no peer-reviewed publications or communication on the part of the historians hired by the tobacco companies the question arises whether some historians are willing to trade their reputation and that of their university for the benefit of an interested party. The book further provides 50 expert profiles of the historians active in tobacco litigation, lists detailing the manner of the expert’s involvement, and West Law references to these cases.This book offers profound and thought-provoking insights on the post-war forensification of history from an interdisciplinary perspective. In this way, Delafontaine makes a stirring call for debate on the contemporary engagement of historians as expert judicial witnesses in U.S. tobacco litigation.

...More
Reviewed By

Essay Review David Mercer (2016) Trying Objectivity. Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (pp. 501-506). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB819121205/

Similar Citations

Article Jasanoff, Sheila; (2002)
Science and the Statistical Victim: Modernizing Knowledge in Breast Implant Litigation (/isis/citation/CBB000202860/)

Article Swanson, Kara; (2007)
Biotech in Court: A Legal Lesson on the Unity of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000780232/)

Book Edmond, Gary; (2004)
Expertise in Regulation and Law (/isis/citation/CBB000641938/)

Book Andrew J. Hogan; (2022)
Disability Dialogues: Advocacy, Science, and Prestige in Postwar Clinical Professions (/isis/citation/CBB207448799/)

Thesis Christopher W. Howell; (2021)
Designer Science: A History of Intelligent Design in America (/isis/citation/CBB325390187/)

Article Lave, Rebecca; Doyle, Martin; Robertson, Morgan; (2010)
Privatizing Stream Restoration in the US (/isis/citation/CBB001034682/)

Book Vig, Norman J.; Faure, Michael G.; (2004)
Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union (/isis/citation/CBB000830072/)

Book Amy Marie Hay; (2021)
The Defoliation of America: Agent Orange Chemicals, Citizens, and Protests (/isis/citation/CBB039979128/)

Article Winter, Alison; (2007)
A Forensics of the Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000772263/)

Article Federico Brandmayr; (May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial (/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)

Article Hammack, Phillip L.; Windell, Eric P.; (2011)
Psychology and the Politics of Same-Sex Desire in the United States: An Analysis of Three Cases (/isis/citation/CBB001220665/)

Article Lynch, Michael; (2006)
From Ruse to Farce (/isis/citation/CBB000780206/)

Book Mirowski, Philip; (2011)
Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science (/isis/citation/CBB001210019/)

Article Cittadino, Eugene; (2004)
Borderline Science: Expert Testimony and the Red River Boundary Dispute (/isis/citation/CBB000470997/)

Authors & Contributors
Edmond, Gary
Kirsch, Stuart
David Demortain
Federico Brandmayr
Morgan, David
Howell, Christopher
Concepts
Science and law
Expert testimony
Authorities; experts
Science and politics
Political activists and activism
Science and government
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
20th century, early
Places
United States
England
Oklahoma (U.S.)
Ecuador
Italy
European Union
Institutions
United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment