Delafontaine, Ramses (Author)
Historian Ramses Delafontaine presents an engaging examination of a controversial legal practice: the historian as an expert judicial witness. This book focuses on tobacco litigation in the U.S. wherein 50 historians have witnessed in 314 court cases from 1986 to 2014. The author examines the use of historical arguments in court and investigates how a legal context influences historical narratives and discourse in forensic history. Delafontaine asserts that the courtroom is a performative and fact-making theatre. Nonetheless, he argues that the civic responsibility of the historian should not end at the threshold of the courtroom where history and truth hang in the balance.The book is divided into three parts featuring an impressive range of European and American case studies. The first part provides a theoretical framework on the issues which arise when history and law interact. The second part gives a comparative overview of European and American examples of forensic history. This part also reviews U.S. legal rules and case law on expert evidence, as well as extralegal challenges historians face as experts. The third part covers a series of tobacco-related trials. With remunerations as high as hundreds of thousands of dollars and no peer-reviewed publications or communication on the part of the historians hired by the tobacco companies the question arises whether some historians are willing to trade their reputation and that of their university for the benefit of an interested party. The book further provides 50 expert profiles of the historians active in tobacco litigation, lists detailing the manner of the expert’s involvement, and West Law references to these cases.This book offers profound and thought-provoking insights on the post-war forensification of history from an interdisciplinary perspective. In this way, Delafontaine makes a stirring call for debate on the contemporary engagement of historians as expert judicial witnesses in U.S. tobacco litigation.
...MoreEssay Review David Mercer (2016) Trying Objectivity. Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (pp. 501-506).
Thesis
VandeWall, Holly R.;
(2011)
Expertise and the Disunity of Science: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Providing Expert Advice for Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001562723/)
Article
Jasanoff, Sheila;
(2002)
Science and the Statistical Victim: Modernizing Knowledge in Breast Implant Litigation
(/isis/citation/CBB000202860/)
Article
Swanson, Kara;
(2007)
Biotech in Court: A Legal Lesson on the Unity of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000780232/)
Article
Edmond, Gary;
(2002)
Legal Engineering: Contested Representations of Law, Science (and Non-Science) and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB000202857/)
Book
Edmond, Gary;
(2004)
Expertise in Regulation and Law
(/isis/citation/CBB000641938/)
Book
David Demortain;
(2020)
The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency
(/isis/citation/CBB170498113/)
Book
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2022)
Disability Dialogues: Advocacy, Science, and Prestige in Postwar Clinical Professions
(/isis/citation/CBB207448799/)
Thesis
Christopher W. Howell;
(2021)
Designer Science: A History of Intelligent Design in America
(/isis/citation/CBB325390187/)
Article
Lave, Rebecca;
Doyle, Martin;
Robertson, Morgan;
(2010)
Privatizing Stream Restoration in the US
(/isis/citation/CBB001034682/)
Book
Vig, Norman J.;
Faure, Michael G.;
(2004)
Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union
(/isis/citation/CBB000830072/)
Book
Amy Marie Hay;
(2021)
The Defoliation of America: Agent Orange Chemicals, Citizens, and Protests
(/isis/citation/CBB039979128/)
Article
Winter, Alison;
(2007)
A Forensics of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000772263/)
Article
Stuart Kirsch;
(2022)
Scientific Ghostwriting in the Amazon? The Role of Experts in the Lawsuit against Chevron in Ecuador
(/isis/citation/CBB754705265/)
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)
Article
Mercer, David;
(2002)
Scientific Method Discourses in the Construction of “EMF Science”: Interests, Resources and Rhetoric in Submissions to a Public Inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB000202862/)
Article
Hammack, Phillip L.;
Windell, Eric P.;
(2011)
Psychology and the Politics of Same-Sex Desire in the United States: An Analysis of Three Cases
(/isis/citation/CBB001220665/)
Article
Lynch, Michael;
(2006)
From Ruse to Farce
(/isis/citation/CBB000780206/)
Book
Mirowski, Philip;
(2011)
Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001210019/)
Article
Cittadino, Eugene;
(2004)
Borderline Science: Expert Testimony and the Red River Boundary Dispute
(/isis/citation/CBB000470997/)
Book
Golan, Tal;
(2004)
Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America
(/isis/citation/CBB000550578/)
Be the first to comment!