Väliverronen, Esa (Author)
Sampsa Saikkonen (Author)
The media have become an important arena where struggles over the symbolic legitimacy of expert authority take place and where scientific experts increasingly have to compete for public recognition. The rise of authoritarian and populist leaders in many countries and the growing importance of social media have fueled criticism against scientific institutions and individual researchers. This paper discusses the new hidden forms of suppression and self-censorship regarding scientists’ roles as public experts. It is based on two web surveys conducted among Finnish researchers in 2015 and 2017. We focus on answers to the open-ended questions in these surveys, where respondents reflect upon issues of freedom of expression and the feedback they receive in public arenas. Building on previous research on suppression, “research silencing,” and the “chilling effect,” we discuss the connection between freedom of expression and freedom of inquiry. We make a distinction between four forms of suppression: political and economic control, organizational control, control between rival academics, and control from publics. Moreover, we make explicit and discuss the means, motives, and practices of suppression within each of these four forms.
...More
Article
Sampsa Saikkonen;
Esa Väliverronen;
(2022)
The trickle-down of political and economic control: On the organizational suppression of environmental scientists in government science
(/isis/citation/CBB033206075/)
Book
Jessica Clements;
Kari Nixon;
(2022)
Optimal Motherhood and Other Lies Facebook Told Us: Assembling the Networked Ethos of Contemporary Maternity Advice
(/isis/citation/CBB196497243/)
Article
Michael Gastrow;
(December 2015)
Science and the Social Media in an African Context: The Case of the Square Kilometre Array Telescope
(/isis/citation/CBB624323978/)
Article
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick;
Benjamin K. Johnson;
Nathaniel A. Silver;
Axel Westerwick;
(October 2015)
Science Exemplars in the Eye of the Beholder: How Exposure to Online Science Information Affects Attitudes
(/isis/citation/CBB467172595/)
Article
Tania Ouariachi;
María Dolores Olvera-Lobo;
José Gutiérrez-Pérez;
(February 2017)
Analyzing Climate Change Communication Through Online Games: Development and Application of Validated Criteria
(/isis/citation/CBB097559624/)
Article
Nicole M. Lee;
Matthew S. VanDyke;
(August 2015)
Set It and Forget It: The One-Way Use of Social Media by Government Agencies Communicating Science
(/isis/citation/CBB427809089/)
Article
Niveen AbiGhannam;
(August 2016)
Madam Science Communicator: A Typology of Women’s Experiences in Online Science Communication
(/isis/citation/CBB300590620/)
Article
Ashley A. Anderson;
Amy B. Becker;
(August 2018)
Not Just Funny After All: Sarcasm as a Catalyst for Public Engagement With Climate Change
(/isis/citation/CBB115006286/)
Article
Ashley A. Anderson;
Heidi E. Huntington;
(October 2017)
Social Media, Science, and Attack Discourse: How Twitter Discussions of Climate Change Use Sarcasm and Incivility
(/isis/citation/CBB225334508/)
Article
Leona Yi-Fan Su;
Dietram A. Scheufele;
Larry Bell;
Dominique Brossard;
Michael A. Xenos;
(October 2017)
Information-Sharing and Community-Building: Exploring the Use of Twitter in Science Public Relations
(/isis/citation/CBB731479797/)
Article
Sarah R. Davies;
Noriko Hara;
(October 2017)
Public Science in a Wired World: How Online Media Are Shaping Science Communication
(/isis/citation/CBB465123405/)
Article
Hepeng Jia;
Dapeng Wang;
Weishan Miao;
Hongjun Zhu;
(October 2017)
Encountered but Not Engaged: Examining the Use of Social Media for Science Communication by Chinese Scientists
(/isis/citation/CBB473304974/)
Article
Danny Flemming;
Ulrike Cress;
Joachim Kimmerle;
(December 2017)
Processing the Scientific Tentativeness of Medical Research: An Experimental Study on the Effects of Research News and User Comments in Online Media
(/isis/citation/CBB202175509/)
Article
Anna Gardiner;
Miriam Sullivan;
Ann Grand;
(February 2018)
Who Are You Writing for? Differences in Response to Blog Design Between Scientists and Nonscientists
(/isis/citation/CBB672503349/)
Article
Kajsa E. Dalrymple;
Rachel Young;
Melissa Tully;
(August 2016)
“Facts, Not Fear”: Negotiating Uncertainty on Social Media During the 2014 Ebola Crisis
(/isis/citation/CBB915604924/)
Article
Mi Rosie Jahng;
Namyeon Lee;
(February 2018)
When Scientists Tweet for Social Changes: Dialogic Communication and Collective Mobilization Strategies by Flint Water Study Scientists on Twitter
(/isis/citation/CBB642757916/)
Article
Sophie Ritson;
(August 2016)
‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere
(/isis/citation/CBB402774757/)
Article
Peter Weingart;
(2022)
Trust or attention? Medialization of science revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB096910888/)
Article
Mirko Ancillotti;
Niklas Holmberg;
Mikael Lindfelt;
Stefan Eriksson;
(2015)
Uncritical and Unbalanced Coverage of Synthetic Biology in the Nordic Press
(/isis/citation/CBB013648247/)
Article
Alessandro Delfanti;
(April 2021)
The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media
(/isis/citation/CBB276472210/)
Be the first to comment!