Article ID: CBB811083686

Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique (2021)

unapi

Whereas there is much discussion about Thomas Kuhn’s notion of methodological incommensurability and many have seen his ideas as an attempt to allow for rational disagreement in science, so far no serious analysis of how exactly Kuhn aims to account for rational disagreement has been proposed. This paper provides the first in-depth analysis of Kuhn’s account of rational disagreement in science—an account that can be seen as the most prominent attempt to allow for rational disagreement in science. Three things will be shown: First, we find not one, but two accounts of rational disagreements in science in Kuhn’s writings: one stemming from methodological incommensurability and one stemming from Kuhn-underdetermination, which are not only fundamentally different—the first purports to explain how disagreeing scientists can nevertheless be rational, while the second attempts to show how rational scientists can nevertheless disagree—but appear to be incompatible with each other. Second, I will assess both accounts. Kuhn’s account from methodological incommensurability is not convincing since it cannot explain rational disagreement in science. Whereas, on the other hand, Kuhn’s account from Kuhn-underdetermination allows for rational disagreement, his argument why we should accept it is not convincing. Third, I present a tentative sketch of an alternative to Kuhn’s account that emphasizes the fallibility of epistemic justification in order to show that Kuhn’s argument founders. In sum, the paper shows that focusing not on the muchly debated consequences of methodological incommensurability, but on Kuhn’s treatment of rational disagreement gives new insight into the adequate interpretation of his thought as well as the cogency of his ideas.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB811083686/

Similar Citations

Book K. Brad Wray; (2021)
Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays (/isis/citation/CBB103514339/)

Book Bird, Alexander; (2000)
Thomas Kuhn (/isis/citation/CBB000110749/)

Chapter Nye, Mary Jo; (2010)
Science and Politics in the Philosophy of Science: Popper, Kuhn, and Polanyi (/isis/citation/CBB001023240/)

Book Leandro Giri; Pablo Melogno; Hernán Miguel; (2023)
Perspectives on Kuhn: Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn (/isis/citation/CBB414507112/)

Book Nola, Robert; Sankey, Howard; (2000)
After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method (/isis/citation/CBB000110543/)

Essay Review Turner, Stephen; (2012)
Habermas Meets Science (/isis/citation/CBB001500125/)

Article Luis Fernández Moreno; Paula Atencia Conde-Pumpido; (2021)
Kuhn, Putnam and the Reference (/isis/citation/CBB979754022/)

Chapter Carrier, Martin; (2003)
Smooth Lines in Confirmation Theory: Carnap, Hempel, and the Moderns (/isis/citation/CBB001213687/)

Article Caneva, Kenneth L.; (2000)
Possible Kuhns in the history of science: Anomalies of incommensurable paradigms (/isis/citation/CBB000110755/)

Book Bojana Mladenović; (2017)
Kuhn's Legacy: Epistemology, Metaphilosophy, and Pragmatism (/isis/citation/CBB010134158/)

Book Thomas S. Kuhn; Bojana Mladenovic; (2022)
The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science (/isis/citation/CBB418530960/)

Article Seguin, Eve; (2000)
Bloor, Latour, and the field (/isis/citation/CBB000110874/)

Article Sismondo, Sergio; (2012)
Fifty Years of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Twenty-Five of Science in Action (/isis/citation/CBB001250748/)

Article Dear, Peter; (2012)
Fifty years of Structure (/isis/citation/CBB001250750/)

Book Mauskopf, Seymour; Schmaltz, Tad; (2012)
Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects (/isis/citation/CBB001500237/)

Article Turner, Stephen; (2012)
Whatever Happened to Knowledge? (/isis/citation/CBB001250758/)

Essay Review Steven William Clarke; (2016)
Popper and His Critics Revisited (/isis/citation/CBB453006071/)

Article Pickering, Andrew; (2012)
The World since Kuhn (/isis/citation/CBB001250757/)

Book Nickles, Thomas; (2003)
Thomas Kuhn (/isis/citation/CBB000201501/)

Authors & Contributors
Mladenovic, Bojana
Melogno, Pablo
Clarke, Steven William
Atencia Conde-Pumpido, Paula
Leandro Giri
Borg, George
Journals
Social Studies of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Science and Education
Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science
Acta Baltica historiae et philosophiae scientiarum
Publishers
Cambridge University Press
Springer Nature
University of Chicago Press
Springer
Princeton University Press
Kluwer Academic
Concepts
Philosophy of science
Philosophers of science, modern
Methodology of science; scientific method
History of science, as a discipline
Historians of science, modern
Incommensurability
People
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Popper, Karl Raimund
Latour, Bruno
Polanyi, Michael
Lakatos, Imre
Feyerabend, Paul K.
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, late
21st century
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment