IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB806762885

“The Best and Most Practical Philosophers”: Seamen and the Authority of Experience in Early Modern Science (2019)

Hellawell, Philippa (Author)

History of Science
Volume: 58
Issue: 1
Pages: 28-50

DOI: 10.1177/0073275319842425

URI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0073275319842425

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Epistemology Observation Expertise Theories of knowledge Sailors Experience; witness Science and society Early modern Royal Society of London

Within the historiography of early modern science, trust and credibility have become synonymous with genteel identity. While we should not overlook the cultural values attached to social hierarchy and how it shaped the credibility of knowledge claims, this has limitations when thinking about how contemporaries regarded the origins of that knowledge and its location in different types of workers and skillsets. Using the example of seamen in the circles of the Royal Society, this article employs the category of experience, and by extension expertise, to illustrate how recognized forms of knowledge and skill acted as routes to credibility and authority in early modern science. It argues that, within the experimental community, the seaman’s authority derived from their direct experience of novel and remote phenomena and the cumulative effect of their wider experience. The accumulated experience they acquired from frequent practice, observation, and exposure translated into a form of “expertness” that rendered seamen trustworthy and credible observers and thinkers. The gentlemanly trust model does not accommodate nor acknowledge the ways the seaman’s direct and accumulated experience (and that of many other professional groups) were recognized and valued in inquiry and discourse. The article therefore sets out a new model for understanding trust, credibility, and authority in early modern science that can take us beyond a restrictive mono-model that locates trust in one sociocultural category to highlight the multiple, and sometimes competing, claims to epistemological authority.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB806762885/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Alisha Rankin; (2022)
How to 'Be Expert' in Early Modern Europe (/isis/citation/CBB778994997/)

Book Stuckrad, Kocku von; (2010)
Locations of Knowledge in Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Esoteric Discourse and Western Identities (/isis/citation/CBB001201627/)

Article Lake, Crystal B.; (2013)
Feeling Things: The Novel Objectives of Sentimental Objects (/isis/citation/CBB001201889/)

Article A. Urry; (2021)
Alfred Newton’s second-hand histories of extinction: Hearsay, gossip, misapprehension (/isis/citation/CBB385478624/)

Article Silvia Manzo; (2019)
Historiographical Approaches on Experience and Empiricism in the Early Nineteenth-Century: Degérando and Tennemann (/isis/citation/CBB444177107/)

Article Alan James Hogarth; Michael Witmore; (2020)
Reflexive witnessing: Boyle, the Royal Society and scientific style (/isis/citation/CBB913351233/)

Book Costa, Palmira Fontes da; (2009)
The Singular and the Making of Knowledge at the Royal Society of London in the Eighteenth Century (/isis/citation/CBB000933064/)

Article Eva Barlösius; Eva Ruffing; (2023)
Drei Formen der Infragestellung der Bedeutsamkeit und Verlässlichkeit von wissenschaftlicher Expertise (Three forms of questioning the significance and reliability of scientific expertise) (/isis/citation/CBB513023307/)

Article Ylva Söderfeldt; (2021)
The Truth Within: Making Medical Knowledge in the Hay Fever Association of Heligoland, 1899–1909 (/isis/citation/CBB223741376/)

Article Tianna Helena Uchacz; (2020)
Reconstructing Early Modern Artisanal Epistemologies and an “Undisciplined” Mode of Inquiry (/isis/citation/CBB002548867/)

Article Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero; (2015)
Bodies of Inference: Christian Wolff’s Epistemology of the Life Sciences and Medicine (/isis/citation/CBB543679230/)

Article Jana Černá; (2019)
Beyond the “Irrational and Superstitious”: The New World, Spanish “Hunters of Nature’s Secrets”, and Transformations of Science in the Early Modern Era (/isis/citation/CBB342986705/)

Article Kathleen M. Vogel; Michael A. Dennis; (September 2018)
Tacit Knowledge, Secrecy, and Intelligence Assessments: STS Interventions by Two Participant Observers (/isis/citation/CBB829576730/)

Chapter Chen-Morris, Raz; (2013)
Imagination, Passions, and the Production of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe: From Lipsius to Descartes (/isis/citation/CBB001201681/)

Article Jürgen Renn; (2018)
The Evolution of Knowledge: Rethinking Science in the Anthropocene (/isis/citation/CBB165571017/)

Article Grantham, Todd A.; (2000)
Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000110861/)

Article Attie, Katherine Bootle; (2013)
Selling Science: Bacon, Harvey and the Commodification of Knowledge (/isis/citation/CBB001320085/)

Book Giuseppe Boscarino; (2016)
Le forme e i mutamenti della scienza (/isis/citation/CBB208526052/)

Article Jim Bennett; (2019)
Mathematicians on Board: Introducing Lunar Distances to Life at Sea (/isis/citation/CBB155594835/)

Book Andrew J. Hogan; (2022)
Disability Dialogues: Advocacy, Science, and Prestige in Postwar Clinical Professions (/isis/citation/CBB207448799/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}