Article ID: CBB805796865

Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (2019)

unapi

How are “interesting” research problems identified and made durable by academic researchers, particularly in situations defined by multiple evaluation principles? Building on two case studies of research groups working on rare diseases in academic biomedicine, we explore how group leaders arrange their groups to encompass research problems that latch onto distinct evaluation principles by dividing and combining work into “basic-oriented” and “clinical-oriented” spheres of inquiry. Following recent developments in the sociology of (e)valuation comparing academics to capitalist entrepreneurs in pursuit of varying kinds of worth, we argue that the metaphor of the portfolio is helpful in analyzing how group leaders manage these different research lines as “alternative investment options” from which they were variously hoping to capitalize. We argue portfolio development is a useful concept for exploring how group leaders fashion “entrepreneurial” practices to manage and exploit tensions between multiple matrices of (e)valuation and conclude with suggestions for how this vocabulary can further extend analysis of epistemic capitalism within science and technology studies.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB805796865/

Similar Citations

Article Natasha D. Schüll; (March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate (/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)

Article Jenny Andersson; Erik Westholm; (2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders (/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; (September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry (/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)

Article Brian Salter; (January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology (/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)

Article David Moats; Liz McFall; (2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools (/isis/citation/CBB339833803/)

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)

Article Kelly Joslin Holloway; (September 2015)
Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization (/isis/citation/CBB582502078/)

Article Mattia Andreoletti; David Teira; (2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? (/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)

Article Joeri Bruyninckx; (September 2017)
Synchronicity: Time, Technicians, Instruments, and Invisible Repair (/isis/citation/CBB976044504/)

Article Cook, Brian R.; Kesby, Mike; Fazey, Ioan; Spray, Chris; (October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference (/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)

Article Akos Kokai; Alastair Iles; Christine Meisner Rosen; (November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices (/isis/citation/CBB745455255/)

Article Allison Loconto; Scott Prudham; Steven Wolf; (2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: guest introduction (/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)

Article Kris Hartley; (November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy (/isis/citation/CBB172268665/)

Authors & Contributors
Henry, Emmanuel
Prudham, Scott
Kris Hartley
Greenhough, Beth
Barnett, Allain J.
Moats, David
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Power (social sciences)
Governance
Science and politics
Expertise
Regulation
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
Places
United States
Canada
Hong Kong
Sweden
China
Austria
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment