Rushforth, Alexander (Author)
Franssen, Thomas (Author)
Rijcke, Sarah de (Author)
How are “interesting” research problems identified and made durable by academic researchers, particularly in situations defined by multiple evaluation principles? Building on two case studies of research groups working on rare diseases in academic biomedicine, we explore how group leaders arrange their groups to encompass research problems that latch onto distinct evaluation principles by dividing and combining work into “basic-oriented” and “clinical-oriented” spheres of inquiry. Following recent developments in the sociology of (e)valuation comparing academics to capitalist entrepreneurs in pursuit of varying kinds of worth, we argue that the metaphor of the portfolio is helpful in analyzing how group leaders manage these different research lines as “alternative investment options” from which they were variously hoping to capitalize. We argue portfolio development is a useful concept for exploring how group leaders fashion “entrepreneurial” practices to manage and exploit tensions between multiple matrices of (e)valuation and conclude with suggestions for how this vocabulary can further extend analysis of epistemic capitalism within science and technology studies.
...More
Article
Maximilian Fochler;
(September 2016)
Variants of Epistemic Capitalism: Knowledge Production and the Accumulation of Worth in Commercial Biotechnology and the Academic Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB025579518/)
Article
Robert G. W. Kirk;
(July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research
(/isis/citation/CBB661013428/)
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
(/isis/citation/CBB661318783/)
Article
Natasha D. Schüll;
(March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Jenny Andersson;
Erik Westholm;
(2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders
(/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)
Article
Brian Salter;
(January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)
Article
David Moats;
Liz McFall;
(2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools
(/isis/citation/CBB339833803/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Kelly Joslin Holloway;
(September 2015)
Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization
(/isis/citation/CBB582502078/)
Article
Ashlyn Jaeger;
(2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain
(/isis/citation/CBB770211028/)
Article
Amy Adams Quark;
(2019)
Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India
(/isis/citation/CBB678564374/)
Article
Mattia Andreoletti;
David Teira;
(2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation?
(/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)
Article
Allain J. Barnett;
Melanie G. Wiber;
(2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015)
(/isis/citation/CBB359628559/)
Article
Joeri Bruyninckx;
(September 2017)
Synchronicity: Time, Technicians, Instruments, and Invisible Repair
(/isis/citation/CBB976044504/)
Article
Cook, Brian R.;
Kesby, Mike;
Fazey, Ioan;
Spray, Chris;
(October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference
(/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)
Article
Akos Kokai;
Alastair Iles;
Christine Meisner Rosen;
(November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices
(/isis/citation/CBB745455255/)
Article
Allison Loconto;
Scott Prudham;
Steven Wolf;
(2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: guest introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)
Article
Kris Hartley;
(November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy
(/isis/citation/CBB172268665/)
Be the first to comment!