Article ID: CBB805796865

Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (2019)


How are “interesting” research problems identified and made durable by academic researchers, particularly in situations defined by multiple evaluation principles? Building on two case studies of research groups working on rare diseases in academic biomedicine, we explore how group leaders arrange their groups to encompass research problems that latch onto distinct evaluation principles by dividing and combining work into “basic-oriented” and “clinical-oriented” spheres of inquiry. Following recent developments in the sociology of (e)valuation comparing academics to capitalist entrepreneurs in pursuit of varying kinds of worth, we argue that the metaphor of the portfolio is helpful in analyzing how group leaders manage these different research lines as “alternative investment options” from which they were variously hoping to capitalize. We argue portfolio development is a useful concept for exploring how group leaders fashion “entrepreneurial” practices to manage and exploit tensions between multiple matrices of (e)valuation and conclude with suggestions for how this vocabulary can further extend analysis of epistemic capitalism within science and technology studies.

Citation URI

Similar Citations

Article Robert G. W. Kirk; (July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research (/isis/citation/CBB661013428/) unapi

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/) unapi

Article Natasha D. Schüll; (March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate (/isis/citation/CBB889022961/) unapi

Article Jenny Andersson; Erik Westholm; (2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders (/isis/citation/CBB589179620/) unapi

Article Emmanuel Henry; (September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry (/isis/citation/CBB676852860/) unapi

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/) unapi

Article David Moats; Liz McFall; (2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools (/isis/citation/CBB339833803/) unapi

Article Brian Salter; (January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology (/isis/citation/CBB380652953/) unapi

Article Kelly Joslin Holloway; (September 2015)
Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization (/isis/citation/CBB582502078/) unapi

Article Ashlyn Jaeger; (2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain (/isis/citation/CBB770211028/) unapi

Article Akos Kokai; Alastair Iles; Christine Meisner Rosen; (November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices (/isis/citation/CBB745455255/) unapi

Article Cook, Brian R.; Kesby, Mike; Fazey, Ioan; Spray, Chris; (October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference (/isis/citation/CBB350967664/) unapi

Article Allain J. Barnett; Melanie G. Wiber; (2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015) (/isis/citation/CBB359628559/) unapi

Article Mattia Andreoletti; David Teira; (2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? (/isis/citation/CBB881753075/) unapi

Article Kris Hartley; (November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy (/isis/citation/CBB172268665/) unapi

Article Joeri Bruyninckx; (September 2017)
Synchronicity: Time, Technicians, Instruments, and Invisible Repair (/isis/citation/CBB976044504/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Henry, Emmanuel
Fochler, Maximilian
Kris Hartley
Moats, David
McFall, Liz
Cook, Brian R.
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
Science and Society
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Power (social sciences)
Science and politics
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
United States
Hong Kong
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment