IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB796825571

On Peirce’s 1878 article ‘The probability of induction’: a conceptualistic appraisal (2021)

Kyriazis, G. A. (Author)

Archive for History of Exact Sciences
Volume: 75
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-20

DOI: 10.1007/s00407-020-00256-x

URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-020-00256-x

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Charles Sanders Peirce wrote the article ‘The probability of induction’ in 1878. It was the fourth article of the series ‘Illustrations of the Logic of Science’ which comprised a total of six articles. According to Peirce, to get a clear idea of the conception of probability, one has ‘to consider what real and sensible difference there is between one degree of probability and another.’ He endorsed what John Venn had called the ‘materialistic view’ of the subject, namely that probability is the proportion of times in which an occurrence of one kind is accompanied by an occurrence of another kind. On the other hand, Peirce recognized the existence of a different interpretation of probability, which was termed by Venn the ‘conceptualistic view,’ namely the degree of belief that ought to be attached to a proposition. Peirce’s intent on writing this article seems to be to inquire about the claims of the conceptualists concerning the problem of induction. After reasoning on some examples, he concluded on the impossibility of assigning probability for induction. We show here that the arguments advanced in his article are not sufficient to support such conclusion. Peirce’s thoughts on the probability of induction surely may have influenced statisticians and research scientists of the twentieth century in shaping data analysis.

...More

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB796825571/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Daude, Olivier; (2011)
Le pragmaticisme et la question du témoignage (/isis/citation/CBB001024474/)

Article Jeoffrey Gaspard; (2021)
“A familiar logical triplet”: on Peirce’s grammar of representation and its relation to scientific inquiry (/isis/citation/CBB856081407/)

Book Forster, Paul; (2011)
Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism (/isis/citation/CBB001210617/)

Article Claudia Cristalli; Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen; (2021)
Abstraction and Generalization in the Logic of Science: Cases from Nineteenth-Century Scientific Practice (/isis/citation/CBB855367059/)

Article Okasha, Samir; (2000)
Van Fraassen's critique of inference to the best explanation (/isis/citation/CBB000110797/)

Article Weatherson, Brian; (1999)
Begging the question and Bayesians (/isis/citation/CBB000110819/)

Article Galavotti, Maria Carla; (2003)
Harold Jeffreys' Probabilistic Epistemology: Between Logicism and Subjectivism (/isis/citation/CBB000410716/)

Book Shanks, Niall; Gardner, Robert B.; (2000)
Logic, Probability and Science (/isis/citation/CBB000102419/)

Article Anellisa, Irving H.; (2012)
Peirce's Truth-Functional Analysis and the Origin of the Truth Table (/isis/citation/CBB001210993/)

Chapter Haaparanta, Leila; (2009)
The Relations between Logic and Philosophy, 1874--1931 (/isis/citation/CBB001210347/)

Article Ferriani, Maurizio; (2002)
Peirce e i diagrammi di Eulero-Venn (/isis/citation/CBB000640762/)

Article Campos, Daniel G.; (2007)
Peirce on the Role of Poietic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning (/isis/citation/CBB001023426/)

Article Shin, Sun-Joo; (1994)
Peirce and the logical status of diagrams (/isis/citation/CBB000059301/)

Article Campos, Daniel G.; (2009)
Imagination, Concentration, and Generalization: Peirce on the Reasoning Abilities of the Mathematician (/isis/citation/CBB001023427/)

Thesis David E. Dunning; (2020)
Writing the Rules of Reason: Notations in Mathematical Logic, 1847–1937 (/isis/citation/CBB517005733/)

Chapter Hilpinen, Risto; (2009)
Conditional and Possible Worlds: On C. S. Pierce's Conception of Conditionals and Modalities (/isis/citation/CBB001210353/)

Article Bellucci, Francesco; (2013)
Diagrammatic Reasoning: Some Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Friedrich A. Lange (/isis/citation/CBB001213915/)

Article Francesco Bellucci; (2015)
Logic, Psychology, and Apperception: Charles S. Peirce and Johann F. Herbart (/isis/citation/CBB115765207/)

Book Brady, Geraldine; (2000)
From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic (/isis/citation/CBB000102342/)

Article Dea, Shannon; (2006)
“Merely a veil over the living thought”: Mathematics and Logic in Peirce's Forgotten Spinoza Review (/isis/citation/CBB001023424/)