IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB786983437

The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan (January 2021)

Hiro Saito (Author)

Science, Technology, and Human Values
Volume: 46
Issue: 1
Pages: 139-165

URI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920905000

DOI: 10.1177/0162243920905000

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Authority of science Nuclear power; atomic energy Science and technology studies (STS) Public policy Participation Expertise Political economy Democracy 21st century Japan

After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, the Japanese government tried to democratize energy policy-making by introducing public participation. Over the course of its implementation, however, public participation came to be subordinated to expert committees as the primary mechanism of policy rationalization. The expert committees not only neutralized the results of public participation but also discounted the necessity of public participation itself. This trajectory of public participation, from its historic introduction to eventual collapse, can be fully explained only in reference to complex interactions between the macroinstitutions and microsituations of Japanese policy-making at the time of the nuclear disaster: the macroinstitutional reassembling of the developmental state to reallocate more power from the bureaucracy to the cabinet office and the civil society vis-à-vis the microsituational, shifting power dynamics involving political parties, citizens and NGOs, businesses and labor unions, and other relevant actors. This case study thus helps advance the growing science and technology studies research on how the macro and microparameters of policy-making, ranging from the durable institutions of nation-states to situationally specific political struggles, combine to shape the designs, implementations, and policy influences of public participation at particular places and times as well as in particular policy domains.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB786983437/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Harry Collins; Robert Evans; Weinel; (August 2016)
STS as science or politics? (/isis/citation/CBB795627192/)

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)

Article Christian Ross; (2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (/isis/citation/CBB828766557/)

Article Yevgeniya Tomkiv; Astrid Liland; Deborah H. Oughton; Brian Wynne; (2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy (/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)

Article Harry Collins; Robert Evans; Martin Weinel; (August 2017)
STS as science or politics? (/isis/citation/CBB939789883/)

Article Sergio Sismondo; (August 2017)
Casting a wider net: A reply to Collins, Evans and Weinel (/isis/citation/CBB445744492/)

Book Christopher M. Kelty; (2020)
The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories (/isis/citation/CBB525160672/)

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)

Article Colleen Lanier-Christensen; (September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making (/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)

Article Papadopoulos, Dimitris; (April 2011)
Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience (/isis/citation/CBB185760393/)

Article Mott Greene; (2022)
Experts, Managerialism, and Democratic Theory (/isis/citation/CBB659481305/)

Article Shin-etsu Sugawara; (2023)
Eliminating Human Agency: Why Does Japan Abandon Predictive Simulations? (/isis/citation/CBB479484171/)

Article Maxime Polleri; (August 2020)
Post-political uncertainties: Governing nuclear controversies in post-Fukushima Japan (/isis/citation/CBB107146947/)

Article Lisa Onaga; Chelsea Szendi Schieder; Kristina Buhrman; Julia Mariko Jacoby; Kohta Juraku; David H. Slater; Anna Wiemann; Alexander Dekant; Stella Winter; Jacob Herzum; Levi McLaughlin; Angela Marie Ortiz; (2021)
Sources of Disaster: A Roundtable Discussion on New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan (/isis/citation/CBB667655080/)

Article Gregory Clancey; (2021)
Commentary on “Sources of Disaster: A Roundtable Discussion on New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan” (/isis/citation/CBB984146673/)

Article Kerry Smith; (2021)
Commentary on “Sources of Disaster: A Roundtable Discussion on New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan” (/isis/citation/CBB626048684/)

Article Jonathan Tollefson; (2020)
Post-Fukushima discourse in the US press: Quantified knowledge, the technical object, and a panicked public (/isis/citation/CBB052093671/)

Article Cook, Brian R.; Kesby, Mike; Fazey, Ioan; Spray, Chris; (October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference (/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)

Article Seiko Ishihara-Shineha; (2021)
Policy Inconsistency between Science and Technology Promotion and Graduate Education Regarding Developing Researchers with Science Communication Skills in Japan (/isis/citation/CBB038298377/)

Article Nina Frahm; Tess Doezema; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission (/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}