When imprecision is a good thing, or how imprecise concepts facilitate integration in biology (2020)
Contrary to the common-sense view and positivist aspirations, scientific concepts are often imprecise. Many of these concepts are ambiguous, vague, or have an under-specified meaning (Gillon 1990). In this paper, I discuss how imprecise concepts promote integration in biology and thus benefit science. Previous discussions of this issue focus on the concepts of molecular gene and evolutionary novelty (Brigandt in Synthese 177:19–40, 2010; Fox Keller in The century of the gene, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000; Love in Philos Sci 75:874–886, 2008; Waters in Philos Sci 61:163–185, 1994). The concept of molecular gene helps biologists integrate explanatory practices, while the notion of evolutionary novelty helps them integrate research questions into an interdisciplinary problem (Brigandt and Love in J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 318:417–427, 2012; Waters, in: Galavotti, Dieks, Gonzalez, Hartmann, Uebel, Weber (eds) New directions in the philosophy of science, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014). In what follows, I compare molecular gene and evolutionary novelty to another imprecise concept, namely biological lineage. This concept promotes two other types of scientific integration: it helps biologists integrate theoretical principles and methodologies into different areas of biology. The concept of biological lineage facilitates these types of integration because it is broad and under-specified in ways that the concepts of molecular gene and evolutionary novelty are not. Hence, I use the concept of biological lineage as a case study to reveal types of integration that have been overlooked by philosophers. This case study also shows that even very imprecise concepts can be beneficial to scientific practice.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Schmitt, Michael;
(2013)
From Taxonomy to Phylogenetics: Life and Work of Willi Hennig
Article
Elliott, Kevin C.;
(2012)
Epistemic and Methodological Iteration in Scientific Research
Article
Stahnisch, Frank W.;
(2005)
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Experimental Practice in Medicine and the Life Sciences
Book
Marinho, José Roberto;
(2006)
Estudos de História e Filosofia das Ciências: Subsídios para Aplicação no Ensino
Thesis
Rolloff, Sylvia Alexis;
(2010)
Explanatory Models in Behavioral Endocrinology
Book
William C. Bausman;
Janella K. Baxter;
Oliver M. Lean;
(2023)
From Biological Practice to Scientific Metaphysics
Article
Jan Brazier;
Molly Duggins;
(2015)
Visualising Nature: Models and Wall Charts for Teaching Biology in Australia and New Zealand
Article
Fridolin Gross;
Nina Kranke;
Robert Meunier;
(2019)
Pluralization Through Epistemic Competition: Scientific Change in Times of Data-Intensive Biology
Article
Christine Aicardi;
(2016)
Francis Crick, cross-worlds influencer: A narrative model to historicize big bioscience
Article
Marco Tamborini;
(2017)
The reception of Darwin in late nineteenth-century German paleontology as a case of pyrrhic victory
Article
Snait B. Gissis;
(2023)
The Neo-Lamarckian Tools Deployed by the Young Durkheim: 1882–1892
Article
Sloan, Phillip R.;
(2003)
Whewell's Philosophy of Discovery and the Archetype of the Vertebrate Skeleton: The Role of German Philosophy of Science in Richard Owen's Biology
Article
Cadeddu, Antonio;
(2000)
The heuristic function of “error” in the scientific methodology of Louis Pasteur: The case of the silkworm diseases
Book
Pietro Daniel Omodeo;
Volkhard Wels;
(2019)
Natural Knowledge and Aristotelianism at Early Modern Protestant Universities
Article
Kruse, Corinna;
(2004)
Making It Work: Balancing Uncertainty and Resources in Genetic Research
Book
Gotthelf, Allan;
Leunissen, Mariska;
Beullens, Pieter;
(2012)
Teleology, First Principles and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Biology
Article
Creager, Angela N. H.;
(2009)
Technical Matters: Method, Knowledge and Infrastructure in Twentieth-Century Life Science
Article
Weber, Bruce H.;
(2007)
Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition
Article
Dalia Nassar;
(2016)
Analogical Reflection as a Source for the Science of Life: Kant and the Possibility of the Biological Sciences
Article
Priscilla M. Wehi;
Hemi Whaanga;
Steve A. Trewick;
(2012)
Artefacts, Biology and Bias in Museum Collection Research
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology
Biological Theory
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Journal of the History of Biology
Be the first to comment!