The analytical notions of ‘thought style’, ‘paradigm’, ‘episteme’ and ‘style of reasoning’ are some of the most popular frameworks in the history and philosophy of science. Although their proponents, Ludwik Fleck, Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault, and Ian Hacking, are all part of the same philosophical tradition that closely connects history and philosophy, the extent to which they share similar assumptions and objectives is still under debate. In the first part of the paper, I shall argue that, despite the fact that these four thinkers disagree on certain assumptions, their frameworks have the same explanatory goal – to understand how objectivity is possible. I shall present this goal as a necessary element of a common project -- that of historicising Kant's a priori. In the second part of the paper, I shall make an instrumental use of the insights of these four thinkers to form a new model for studying objectivity. I shall also propose a layered diagram that allows the differences between the frameworks to be mapped, while acknowledging their similarities. This diagram will show that the frameworks of style of reasoning and episteme illuminate conditions of possibility that lie at a deeper level than those considered by thought styles and paradigms.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
George Borg;
(2020)
On 'the application of science to science itself:' Chemistry, instruments, and the scientific labor process
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2010)
The Politics of Cognition: Genesis and Development of Ludwik Fleck's “Comparative Epistemology”
Book
Matteo Vagelli;
(2024)
Reconsidering Historical Epistemology: French and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science
Thesis
Hedfors, Eva;
(2006)
Reading Fleck: Questions on Philosophy and Science
Article
Tivadar Vervoort;
(2025)
“Nous Sommes Tous Néokantiens”: Foucault, Lukács, and the Critique of Social Forms
Book
Machan, Tibor R.;
(2004)
Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science, and Everyday Life
Article
Shaul Bar-Haim;
(2020)
Proving Nothing and Illustrating Much: The Case of Michael Balint
Article
Toader, Iulian D.;
(2013)
Concept Formation and Scientific Objectivity: Weyl's Turn against Husserl
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
Book
Mansoor Niaz;
(2019)
Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education
Book
Rosen, Jo;
(2010)
Lawless Universe: Science and the Hunt for Reality
Chapter
Uus, Undo;
(2001)
The Glory and Misery of Modern Science
Thesis
Brister, Evelyn Louise;
(2002)
Scientific Objectivity and Scientific Objectives
Book
Bojana Mladenović;
(2017)
Kuhn's Legacy: Epistemology, Metaphilosophy, and Pragmatism
Article
Markus Seidel;
(2021)
Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique
Book
Thomas S. Kuhn;
Bojana Mladenovic;
(2022)
The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science
Chapter
Carsten Reinhardt;
(2016)
Experimental Turnaround, 360°: The Essential Kuhn Circle
Article
Luis Fernández Moreno;
Paula Atencia Conde-Pumpido;
(2021)
Kuhn, Putnam and the Reference
Article
Walker, David;
(2012)
A Kuhnian Defence of Inference to the Best Explanation
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul;
(2010)
Discussion: Kuhn's Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and “The Road since Structure”
Be the first to comment!