John Paul Nelson (Author)
Sarewitz, Daniel R. (Advisor)
Arizona State University
Sarewitz, Daniel R.
Physical Details: 357
Language: English
Over the last few hundred years, best practice in some fields of human action—e.g., the treatment of heart disease, the transportation of persons, goods, and messages, and the destruction of landscapes, structures, and lives—has become dramatically more effective. At the same time, best practice in other fields, e.g., the amelioration of poverty or the teaching of reading, writing, or math, has improved more slowly, if at all. I argue that practice and technology (“know-how”) can only improve rapidly under rather special conditions: that, at any given point in time, some fields are more “progressible” than others. I articulate a conceptual framework describing several characteristics of practice in a field that may facilitate rapid progress. These characteristics, while not fixed, tend to remain fairly stable for long periods of time. I argue that know-how can improve more quickly 1) when offline “vicarious trial” of variations in practice is feasible and useful; 2) when practice is formal and standardized; 3) when practice is substantially performed by artifacts rather than by humans; 4) when outcomes of variations in practice may be rapidly evaluated; 5) when goals of practice are consistently agreed upon; 6) when contexts and objects of practice may be treated as, or have been made, consistent for the purposes of intervention; 7) when components of task systems are not heavily interdependent; and 8) when labor is finely and sharply divided. I illustrate and elaborate this framework through comparative case studies on efforts to improve practice in three differentially “progressible” fields. I examine rapid improvement in a COVID-19 testing lab, inconsistent improvement in undergraduate algebra instruction, and ambiguous improvement in regional water modeling to support municipal water management. These cases indicate that my theory may inform judgments about the plausibility of rapid advance within a field of practice, absent disruptive change in methods or problem formulation. My theory may also shed light on which varieties of innovative effort may and may not foreseeably contribute to improving practice in a given field—more formal, theoretical, and context-independent work in high-progressibility domains, more tacit, grounded, and localized work in low-progressibility ones.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Morison, Elting;
(2016)
Men, machines, and modern times
(/isis/citation/CBB152794207/)
Book
Søren Riis Roskilde University;
(2018)
Unframing Martin Heidegger’s Understanding of Technology: On the Essential Connection between Technology, Art, and History
(/isis/citation/CBB339926254/)
Book
Germain, Gilbert G.;
(2017)
Thinking about Technology: How the Technological Mind Misreads Reality
(/isis/citation/CBB634205082/)
Book
Campbell, Timothy C.;
(2011)
Improper Life: Technology and Biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben
(/isis/citation/CBB001213398/)
Article
Rae, Gavin;
(2014)
Heidegger's Influence on Posthumanism: The Destruction of Metaphysics, Technology and the Overcoming of Anthropocentrism
(/isis/citation/CBB001214381/)
Book
Tofts, Darren;
Jonson, Annemarie;
Cavallaro, Alessio;
(2002)
Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History
(/isis/citation/CBB000302025/)
Article
Buchanan, Bruce;
(2008)
Don Ihde and the Challenge of Technology Transfer
(/isis/citation/CBB001031105/)
Book
Baldeweg, Juan Navarro;
Tuukkanen, Pirkko;
(2000)
Matter and Mind in Architecture
(/isis/citation/CBB000101694/)
Book
Achterhuis, Hans;
(2001)
American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn
(/isis/citation/CBB000100786/)
Article
Kidd, Ian James;
(2012)
Oswald Spengler, Technology, and Human Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001212430/)
Book
Ihde, Don;
(2010)
Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001031302/)
Article
Record, Isaac;
(2008)
Frankenstein in Lilliput: Science at the Nanoscale
(/isis/citation/CBB001023350/)
Book
Mitcham, Carl;
(2000)
Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB000100785/)
Book
Böhme, Gernot;
Manzei, Alexandra;
(2003)
Kritische Theorie der Technik und der Natur
(/isis/citation/CBB000831007/)
Book
Wills, David;
(2008)
Dorsality: Thinking Back through Technology and Politics
(/isis/citation/CBB000952030/)
Article
Hu, Hua-kai;
(2008)
The Taoist Technological View and Its Implications for Modern Science and Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB000952307/)
Chapter
Dolza, Luisa;
(2008)
“Industrious Observations, Grounded Conclusions, and Profitable Inventions and Discoveries; the Best State of That Province”: Technology and Culture during Francis Bacon's Stay in France
(/isis/citation/CBB000952605/)
Article
Fosse, Sébastien de la;
(2013)
Media and Cognition: The Relationship between Thought Structures and Media Structures
(/isis/citation/CBB001201747/)
Article
Bai, Ye-xin;
Li, Yan-mei;
(2008)
Animadversion on Technocracy and Anti-Technocracy in the Former Soviet Union
(/isis/citation/CBB000952317/)
Book
Kroes, Peter;
Meijers, Anthonie;
Mitcham, Carl;
(2000)
Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB000101895/)
Be the first to comment!