Article ID: CBB770211028

(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain (2019)

unapi

The scientific and political debate over whether a fetus can experience pain highlights a vital and controversial boundary for governance—the boundary of human life. I use the 2012 and 2013 US federal debates over twenty-week abortion bans (also known as fetal pain laws) to investigate how personhood is constructed in a society transformed by biomedical science and technology in the United States. Although those who support and oppose the bill take different stances on abortion regulation, each relies on biomedical knowledge and risk assessment to substantiate claims. Through content analysis of congressional documents, I find that members of Congress strategically draw on biomedical discourse to manage the boundaries of bodies and construct a universal “at-risk” political subject in need of governmental protection. These findings bring scholarly debates about personhood into the era of biomedicalization by emphasizing the latent process of creating a hybridized subjectivity that I call cybernetic personhood.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB770211028/

Similar Citations

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)

Article Mattia Andreoletti; David Teira; (2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? (/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)

Article Alexander Rushforth; Thomas Franssen; Sarah de Rijcke; (2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; (September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry (/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)

Article Colleen Lanier-Christensen; (September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making (/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)

Article Cook, Brian R.; Kesby, Mike; Fazey, Ioan; Spray, Chris; (October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference (/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)

Article Luciana Landgraf Castelo Branco; (2023)
Rethinking governance through Samarco’s dam collapse in Brazil: a critique from the STS perspective (/isis/citation/CBB165051260/)

Article Lauren Richter; Alissa Cordner; Phil Brown; (October 2018)
Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds (/isis/citation/CBB792947339/)

Book Ioana Cîrstocea; (2019)
La fin de la femme rouge?: fabriques transnationales du genre après la chute du Mur (/isis/citation/CBB169534025/)

Article Allison Loconto; Scott Prudham; Steven Wolf; (2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: Guest introduction (/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)

Article Nassim JafariNaimi; (March 2018)
Our Bodies in the Trolley’s Path, or Why Self-driving Cars Must *Not* Be Programmed to Kill (/isis/citation/CBB556129964/)

Article Akos Kokai; Alastair Iles; Christine Meisner Rosen; (November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices (/isis/citation/CBB745455255/)

Article Natasha D. Schüll; (March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate (/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)

Authors & Contributors
Henry, Emmanuel
Colleen Lanier-Christensen
Prudham, Scott
Rijcke, Sarah de
JafariNaimi, Nassim
Greenhough, Beth
Journals
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Science as Culture
Publishers
Presses Universitaires de Rennes
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Power (social sciences)
Governance
Expertise
Science and politics
Regulation
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
Places
United States
Europe
Canada
India
Great Britain
Brazil
Institutions
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
European Commission
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment