The Bureaucracy of Empathy: Vivisection and the Question of Animal Pain in Britain, 1876-1912 (2017)
Shmuely, Shira Dina (Author)
Ritvo, Harriet N. (Advisor)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Ritvo, Harriet N.
This dissertation examines the mutually reinforcing connections between science and law and their construction of pain in British regulation of animal experimentation. It investigates the Home Office's implementation of the Cruelty to Animals Act (1876), the first effort anywhere in the world to impose legal restrictions on vivisection, during the three decades following its enactment. The study ends in 1912 with the findings of a second Royal Commission that evaluated the workings of the Act. The Commission reaffirmed many of the Home Office polices regarding vivisection and their underlying premises. The Act mandated official supervision of scientific experiments that "calculated to give pain" to animal subjects. Implementing the Act therefore necessitated the identification and quantification of pain. This requirement created what I term the "bureaucracy of empathy," an attempt to systemize the understanding of animal suffering through administrative mechanisms. Practicing empathy was integral to some bureaucratic tasks, for example, attaching the right certificate to an inoculation experiment. Additionally, various factors including legal settings and scientific knowledge informed and situated this empathy with animals, when, for instance, an inspector drafted a report about mutilated monkeys while visiting a physiology laboratory. My analysis unravels that defining animal pain was often intertwined with the definition of an experiment. Law and science co-constitution of pain and experiments conditioned both the daily work of administering the law and the practices of experimenters. This dynamic led to the adoption of technologies such as anesthesia and pain scoring models, which provided legal-medical means to control pain in research and to ostensibly create a cruelty free experimental fact. A new pain-based ethical order was established, designed by law officers, civil servants, and court judges as much as by physiologists, remaking the relationships between experimenters, state representatives, and laboratory animals. (Copies available exclusively from MIT Libraries, libraries.mit.edu/docs - docs@mit.edu)
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Finn, Michael A.;
Stark, James F.;
(2015)
Medical Science and the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876: A Re-Examination of Anti-Vivisectionism in Provincial Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB001422111/)
Book
Landes, Joan B.;
Lee, Paula Young;
Youngquist, Paul;
(2012)
Gorgeous Beasts: Animal Bodies in Historical Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB001451942/)
Article
Tarquin Holmes;
(2021)
Science, sensitivity and the sociozoological scale: Constituting and complicating the human-animal boundary at the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection and beyond
(/isis/citation/CBB079918903/)
Article
Carvalho, André Luis de Lima;
Waizbort, Ricardo;
(2010)
A dor além dos confins do homem: aproximações preliminares ao debate entre Frances Power Cobbe e os darwinistas a respeito da vivissecção na Inglaterra vitoriana (1863--1904)
(/isis/citation/CBB001420463/)
Article
Pierre-Luc Germain;
Luca Chiapperino;
Giuseppe Testa;
(2017)
The European politics of animal experimentation: From Victorian Britain to ‘Stop Vivisection’
(/isis/citation/CBB443117651/)
Book
Rudacille, Deborah;
(2000)
The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict Between Animal Research and Animal Protection
(/isis/citation/CBB000101123/)
Book
Guerrini, Anita;
(2003)
Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights
(/isis/citation/CBB000330970/)
Article
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico;
(2013)
Early Modern Experimentation on Live Animals
(/isis/citation/CBB001320050/)
Article
Guerrini, Anita;
(2013)
Experiments, Causation, and the Uses of Vivisection in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001320051/)
Thesis
Mitch Goldsmith;
(2023)
The Unfinished Business of Anna Kingsford: Science, Enchantment, and Experiments on Animals
(/isis/citation/CBB697646509/)
Chapter
Gray, Liz;
(2014)
Body, Mind and Madness: Pain in Animals in Nineteenth-Century Comparative Psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB001202329/)
Article
Lisner, Wiebke;
(2009)
Experimente am lebendigen Leib: Zur Frage der Vivisektion in deutschen und britischen medizinischen Wochenschriften 1919--1939
(/isis/citation/CBB001220576/)
Article
Feller, David A.;
(2009)
Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Anti-Vivisection Controversy of 1875
(/isis/citation/CBB001030028/)
Article
Asdal, Kristin;
(2008)
Subjected to Parliament: The Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and the Animal Body
(/isis/citation/CBB000953523/)
Chapter
White, Paul S.;
(2005)
The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB000772879/)
Article
Boddice, Rob;
(2011)
Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876--1885
(/isis/citation/CBB001034548/)
Article
Machado, Carlos José Saldanha;
Filipecki, Ana Tereza Pinto;
Teixeira, Márcia de Oliveira;
Klein, Helena Espellet;
(2010)
A regulação do uso de animais no Brasil do século XX e o processo de formação do atual regime aplicado à pesquisa biomédica
(/isis/citation/CBB001420444/)
Book
Cathy Gere;
(2017)
Pain, Pleasure, and the Greater Good: From the Panopticon to the Skinner Box and Beyond
(/isis/citation/CBB743975944/)
Book
Anita Guerrini;
(2022)
Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Aristotle to CRISPR
(/isis/citation/CBB030333227/)
Book
Rob Boddice;
(2022)
Humane Professions: The Defense of Experimental Medicine, 1876–1914
(/isis/citation/CBB789019091/)
História, Ciências, Saúde---Manguinhos
Journal of the History of Biology
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Social Studies of Science
Be the first to comment!