Goldstein, Amanda Jo (Author)
Reconstructions of Romantic-era life science in general, and epigenesis in particular, frequently take the Kantian logic of autotelic “self-organization” as their primary reference point. I argue in this essay that the Kantian conceptual rubric hinders our historical and theoretical understanding of epigenesis, Romantic and otherwise. Neither a neutral gloss on epigenesis, nor separable from the epistemological deflation of biological knowledge that has received intensive scrutiny in the history and philosophy of science, Kant’s heuristics of autonomous “self-organization” in the third Critique amount to the strategic capture of epigenesis from nature, for thought, in thought’s critical transcendence of nature. This essay looks to Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and his English contemporary Erasmus Darwin to begin to reconstruct the rigorously materialist, naturalist, and empiricist theories of epigenesis (still) marginalized by Kantian argumentation. As theorists of environmental and social collaboration in the ontogeny of viable forms, Lamarck and Darwin illuminate features of our own epigenetic turn obscured by the rhetoric of “self-organization,” allowing us to glimpse an alternative Romantic genealogy of the biological present.
...More
Book
Amanda Jo Goldstein;
(2017)
Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life
(/isis/citation/CBB817048513/)
Article
Gohau, Gabriel;
(2014)
Darwin and the Geological Controversies over the Steady-State Worldview in the 1830s
(/isis/citation/CBB001500026/)
Book
Stuart Mathieson;
(2020)
Evangelicals and the Philosophy of Science: The Victoria Institute, 1865-1939
(/isis/citation/CBB676582188/)
Book
Amanda Jo Goldstein;
(2017)
Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life
(/isis/citation/CBB350652099/)
Article
Jenkins, Bill;
(2015)
Henry H. Cheek and Transformism: New Light on Charles Darwin's Edinburgh Background
(/isis/citation/CBB001552649/)
Article
Egerton, Frank N.;
(1976)
Darwin's early reading of Lamarck
(/isis/citation/CBB000012685/)
Book
Agustí Camós Cabeceran;
(2021)
La Huella de Lamarck en España en el Siglo XIX
(/isis/citation/CBB874294977/)
Book
Joel Faflak;
(2017)
Marking Time: Romanticism and Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB567211992/)
Book
Barloy, Jean-Jacques;
(1980)
Lamarck contre Darwin: L'évolution des êtres vivants
(/isis/citation/CBB000000764/)
Article
Laurent, Goulven;
(1995)
Lamarck, Lyell et Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB000037863/)
Book
Gillott, David;
(2015)
Samuel Butler against the Professionals: Rethinking Lamarckism 1860-1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001551952/)
Article
Goux, Jean-Michel;
(1993)
Darwin et la théorie de l'évolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000031216/)
Article
Andrés Galera;
(2017)
The Impact of Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution Before Darwin’s Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB907079027/)
Chapter
Burkhardt, Richard W., Jr.;
(2011)
Lamarck, Cuvier, and Darwin on Animal Behavior and Acquired Characters
(/isis/citation/CBB001500083/)
Book
(1997)
Le Muséum au premier siècle de son histoire
(/isis/citation/CBB000076024/)
Book
Grimoult, Cédric;
(2002)
Sur les traces des grands évolutionnistes
(/isis/citation/CBB000600518/)
Article
Moreno, Juan;
(2009)
Lamarck necesita a Darwin: la búsqueda de intención en el estudio de la evolución y de la historia
(/isis/citation/CBB001020976/)
Article
Hajo Greif;
(2015)
The Darwinian tension: Romantic science and the causal laws of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB515135796/)
Thesis
Burkett, Andrew;
(2008)
The Ministry of Chance: British Romanticism, Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and the Aleatory
(/isis/citation/CBB001561190/)
Book
Charles Morris Lansley;
(2018)
Charles Darwin’s Debt to the Romantics: How Alexander von Humboldt, Goethe and Wordsworth Helped Shape Darwin’s View of Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB071153620/)
Be the first to comment!