Scientific Ghostwriting in the Amazon? The Role of Experts in the Lawsuit against Chevron in Ecuador (2022)
Kirsch, Stuart (Author)
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Volume: 64
Issue: 2
Pages: 335-362
In 2011, lawyers for the Chevron Corporation filed a civil suit against an aqueous geochemist under federal racketeering and corruption laws. They claimed that the geochemist and her colleagues had ghostwritten significant portions of a report attributed to a court-appointed expert in Ecuador, although the accusation was subsequently withdrawn. The original case addressed the environmental impact of Chevron’s operations in lowland Ecuador, the subject of a $9 billion judgment against the oil company. This article treats legal transcripts and depositions as examples of life writing to examine the contribution of experts to environmental litigation. It adds to recent scholarship on the instability of scientific authorship by comparing different forms of ghostwriting. Whereas the pharmaceutical industry employs ghostwriters to conceal the potentially harmful consequences of its products, the scientists contributing to the case against Chevron sought to make the company’s environmental impacts visible. The company undermined confidence in the legal proceedings in Ecuador by criticizing the experts for the plaintiffs rather than their data, preventing people whose lives and livelihoods have been affected by oil contamination from collecting the judgment against Chevron. This corporate strategy may have a chilling effect on the willingness of environmental scientists and other expert witnesses to provide evidence against powerful corporations. There is a need for better accounting of scientific research undertaken in support of environmental litigation, especially given the high stakes of legal contests like this one, in which corporate fortunes, human lives, and the fate of the environment are contingent on their technical expertise.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Timo Bolt;
Jacomien Gijzeman;
Joost Vijselaar;
(2019)
Ter observatie opgenomen. Pieter Baan Centrum 1949-2019 [Admitted for observation: Pieter Baan Center 1949-2019]
(/isis/citation/CBB526540851/)
Thesis
VandeWall, Holly R.;
(2011)
Expertise and the Disunity of Science: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Providing Expert Advice for Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001562723/)
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)
Article
M'charek, Amade;
Hagendijk, Rob;
Vries, Wiebe de;
(2013)
Equal before the Law: On the Machinery of Sameness in Forensic DNA Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB001320664/)
Article
Brushwood, David B.;
(2009)
Recent Trends in Pharmacy Law and Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB000933447/)
Book
Ramses Delafontaine;
(2015)
Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation: A Controversial Legal Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB819121205/)
Article
Marcus B. Carrier;
(2021)
The Making of Evident Expertise: Transforming Chemical Analytical Methods into Judicial Evidence
(/isis/citation/CBB614136192/)
Book
Haber, Carole;
(2013)
The Trials of Laura Fair: Sex, Murder, and Insanity in the Victorian West
(/isis/citation/CBB001420198/)
Article
STEFAN WULF;
(2020)
„Schlagt das Hitlerei zu Brei.“: Politische Strafsachen, Psychopathie und verminderte Zurechnungsfähigkeit im Spiegel psychiatrischer Gutachten Albrecht Langelüddekes, 1937–1945
(/isis/citation/CBB882055559/)
Article
Ingrid G. Farreras;
(2019)
The professionalization of psychologists as court personnel: Consequences of the first institutional commitment law for the “feebleminded”
(/isis/citation/CBB969643572/)
Article
Mar Cuenca-Lorente;
(2017)
Poisons, Trials and Experts: Pere Mata I Fontanet (1811–1877) and Spanish Nineteenth-Century Toxicology
(/isis/citation/CBB713181362/)
Article
Dan Degerman;
(2019)
‘Am I mad?’: the Windham case and Victorian resistance to psychiatry
(/isis/citation/CBB373188237/)
Article
Nicholas Duvall;
(2017)
‘If experts differ, what are we to do in the matter?’ The Medico-legal Investigation of Gunshot Wounds in a 1927 Scottish Murder Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB537944644/)
Book
José Ramón Bertomeu Sánchez;
(2019)
¿Entre el fiscal y el verdugo?: Mateu Orfila i Rotger (1787-1853) y la toxicología del siglo XIX
(/isis/citation/CBB107113642/)
Article
Winter, Alison;
(2007)
A Forensics of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000772263/)
Chapter
Ray, Arthur J.;
(2006)
Kroeber and the California Claims: Historical Particularism and Cultural Ecology in Court
(/isis/citation/CBB000760275/)
Article
Burney, Ian;
(2002)
Testing Testimony: Toxicology and the Law of Evidence in Early Nineteenth-Century England
(/isis/citation/CBB000202867/)
Article
Mercer, David;
(2002)
Scientific Method Discourses in the Construction of “EMF Science”: Interests, Resources and Rhetoric in Submissions to a Public Inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB000202862/)
Article
Lynch, Michael;
Cole, Simon;
(2005)
Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB000650985/)
Article
McClive, Cathy;
(2008)
Blood and Expertise: The Trials of the Female Medical Expert in the Ancien-Régime Courtroom
(/isis/citation/CBB000830239/)
Be the first to comment!