Cooper, Andrew (Author)
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 265-286
While Kant introduces his critical philosophy in continuity with the experimental tradition begun by Francis Bacon, it is widely accepted that his Copernican revolution places experimental physics outside the bounds of science. Yet scholars have recently contested this view. They argue that in Critique of the Power of Judgment Kant’s engagement with the growing influence of vitalism in the 1780s leads to an account of nature’s formative power that returns experimental physics within scientific parameters. Several critics are sceptical of this revised reading. They argue that Kant’s third Critique serves precisely to deflate the epistemological status of experimental physics, thereby protecting science from the threat of vitalism. In this paper I examine Kant’s account of science in the context of the experimental tradition of philosophy, particularly in relation to the generation dilemma of the eighteenth century. I argue that Kant does not deflate the epistemological status of experimental physics but rather introduces systematicity to the experimental tradition. By identifying the reflective use of reason to organize laws of experience into a systematic whole, Kant aims to ground experimental inquiry on the secure course of a science, opening a conception of science as a research programme.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Waxman, Wayne;
(2014)
Kant's Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind
Thesis
Bohang Chen;
(2016)
The Death of Early Twentieth Century Vitalism
Article
Jessica J. Williams;
(2020)
“The Shape of a Four-Footed Animal in General”: Kant on Empirical Schemata and the System of Nature
Article
Raiger, Michael;
(2010)
Coleridge's Theory of Symbol and the Distinction between Reason and Understanding: A Genealogical Recovery of the Baconian Method of Science
Essay Review
Shank, J. B.;
(2005)
The Sciences in Old Regime France: A Review of Recent Scholarship
Article
Sergio H. Orozco-Echeverri;
Sebastián Molina-Betancur;
(2019)
José Celestino Mutis’ Appropriation of Newton’s Experimental Physics in New Granada (1761–1808)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2020)
The Problem of the Empirical Basis in the Popperian Tradition: Popper, Bartley, and Feyerabend
Chapter
Pomata, Gianna;
(2010)
Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, 1500--1650
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
Chapter
Park, Katharine;
(2010)
Observation in the Margins, 500--1500
Article
Stephen Harrop;
(2022)
Essence, Experiment, and Underdetermination in the Spinoza-Boyle Correspondence
Article
Aaron Spink;
(2018)
The Experimental Physics of Jacques Rohault
Article
Siobhan Chapman;
(2018)
The Experimental and the Empirical: Arne Naess' Statistical Approach to Philosophy
Article
Joshua August Skorburg;
(2018)
Jane Addams as Experimental Philosopher
Article
Alberto Vanzo;
(2018)
Introduction
Article
Tom Sorell;
(2018)
Experimental Philosophy and the History of Philosophy
Book
Fabian Kraemer;
(2023)
A Centaur in London: Reading and Observation in Early Modern Science
Article
Paolo Pecere;
(2023)
Materialism, Lebenskraft and the limits of science: Metaphysical vitalism in post-Kantian scenarios
Article
Daniel Jon Mitchell;
(2018)
From Corps to Discipline, Part One: Charles d'Almeida, Pierre Bertin and French Experimental Physics, 1840–1880
Article
Boury, Dominique;
(2008)
Irritability and Sensibility: Key Concepts in Assessing the Medical Doctrines of Haller and Bordeu
Be the first to comment!