Article ID: CBB741455128

Leibniz on Corporeal Substance (2016)

unapi

As an idealist, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz could not recognize anything corporeal as substantial. However, under the influence of Cartesian terminology, he devoted considerable effort to analysing the corporeal world, while not recognizing its real substantiality of course. Leibniz took the concept of substance from Plato, Aristotle and the scholastics, but developed it in two ways. It is a well-known fact that Leibniz introduced the term ‘corporeal substance’ in his letter to Antoine Arnauld dated to October 1687. In the letter, Leibniz understands an object of nature, like an animal or a plant, as ‘corporeal substance’. In the very same letter, Leibniz introduces the terms ‘indivisibility’ and ‘phenomenon’. Every corporeal substance can be real only as a unity, i.e. by being indivisible. Such entity must have a soul or at least an entelechy. In an opposite case, that entity would not be a real unity but just a phenomenon. No corporeal entity is indivisible and therefore not a substance. The paper aims at introducing Leibniz’s distinction between substances and phenomena and taking a closer look at the historicalphilosophical influences Leibniz experienced while developing his views of the corporeal world. Aristotle and Descartes will receive most of the attention, of course, as the concepts of ‘entelechy’ and ‘hylomorphism’ were introduced by the former, and the understanding of corporeal substance as determined by extension alone is part of the latter. The core of the original critique by Leibniz takes off from the properties of the continuum as well as the nature of shape, motion and extension. The case of continuum will receive special attention. It is analysed with the help of the novel approaches by Samuel Levey and Vassil Vidinsky. Leibniz was critical about our poor understanding of the continuum but his own interpretation of it was not fully consistent either. Although the new developments enable us to take a fresh look that has not been possible so far, the issue remains open for further study.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB741455128/

Similar Citations

Chapter Guicciardini, Niccolò; (2003)
Newton's method and Leibniz's calculus (/isis/citation/CBB000355267/)

Chapter Serfati, Michel; (2008)
Symbolic Inventiveness and “Irrationalist” Practices in Leibniz's Mathematics (/isis/citation/CBB001023822/)

Article Nauenberg, Michael; (2014)
Barrow, Leibniz and the Geometrical Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of the Calculus (/isis/citation/CBB001451117/)

Book Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm; Hecht, Hartmut; (2009)
Naturwissenschaftliche, medizinische und technische Schriften. Erster Band 1668--1676 (/isis/citation/CBB001022071/)

Thesis Schimoler, Robert L.; (1980)
Leibniz on perception, experience, and reason (/isis/citation/CBB001563633/)

Chapter Rey, Anne-Lise; (2008)
La figure du leibnizianisme dans les Institutions de physique (/isis/citation/CBB000800159/)

Book Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm; Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, ; (2004)
Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe: Dritte Reihe: Mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und technischer Briefwechsel. Bd. 6: 1694 - Juni 1696 (/isis/citation/CBB000771824/)

Book Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm; Look, Brandon; Rutherford, Donald; (2007)
The Leibniz-Des Bosses Correspondence (/isis/citation/CBB000772795/)

Book Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm; Mayer, Uwe; Probst, Siegmund; Sefrin-Weis, Heike; (2008)
Mathematische Schriften. Band 5: 1674-1676. Infinitesimalmathematik (/isis/citation/CBB000951705/)

Book Lefèvre, Wolfgang; (2001)
Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: Philosophy and Science in the Eighteenth Century (/isis/citation/CBB000100782/)

Chapter Bredekamp, Horst; (2007)
Leibniz's Theater of Nature and Art and the Idea of a Universal Picture Atlas (/isis/citation/CBB000774498/)

Article Peiffer, Jeanne; (2006)
Jacob Bernoulli, maître et rival de son frère Johann (/isis/citation/CBB001021364/)

Chapter Krajewski, Wladyslaw; (2000)
Aristotelian and Leibnizian Concepts of Possibility (/isis/citation/CBB000410679/)

Chapter Wilson, Catherine; (1997)
Leibniz and the animalcula (/isis/citation/CBB000075966/)

Authors & Contributors
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von
Roland, Jeanne
Nachtomy, Ohad
Wilson, Catherine
Serfati, Michel
Sefrin-Weis, Heike
Concepts
Mathematics
Calculus
Philosophy
Primary literature (historical sources)
Soul (philosophy)
Mechanism; mechanical philosophy
Time Periods
17th century
18th century
Enlightenment
Places
Italy
Germany
Europe
Institutions
Università di Padova
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment