Article ID: CBB736945756

Public scientific testimony in the scientific image (2020)

unapi

In this paper, I draw on philosophy of science to address a challenge for science communication. Empirical research indicates that some people who trust a meteorologist's report that they are in the path of a storm do not trust a climate scientist's report that we are on a path to global warming. Such selective skepticism about climate science exemplifies a more general challenge: The Challenge of Selective Uptake Laypersons who generally accept public scientific testimony nevertheless fail to accept public scientific testimony concerning select, equally well warranted, scientific hypotheses. A prominent response arising from the novel interdisciplinary science of science communication is a principle called Consensus Reporting. According to this principle, science reporters should, whenever feasible, report the scientific consensus or lack thereof for a reported scientific view. However, philosophy of science may offer a different perspective on the issue. This perspective is critical insofar as it indicates some inadequacies of Consensus Reporting. But it is also constructive insofar as it guides the development of an alternative principle, Justification Reporting, according to which science reporters should, whenever feasible, report aspects of the nature and strength of scientific justification or lack thereof for a reported scientific view. A central difference between these proposals is that Consensus Reporting appeals to the authority of the scientists whereas Justification Reporting appeals to the authority of scientific justification. As such, Justification Reporting reflects the image of science. The paper considers the philosophical and empirical motivation for Justification Reporting and its limitations. This includes prospects and problems for implementing it in a way that addresses The Challenge of Selective Uptake. From a methodological point of view, the paper illustrates how empirically informed philosophy of science may help address challenges for science communication.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB736945756/

Similar Citations

Chapter Nielsen, Kristian H.; (2012)
Expedition “Live”: Science, Media, and Politics on the Galathea 3 Expedition, 2006--2007 (/isis/citation/CBB001210272/)

Article Moser, Susanne C.; (2010)
Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions (/isis/citation/CBB001221298/)

Book Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann; (2018)
The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public (/isis/citation/CBB549674958/)

Thesis Kahle, Shannon A.; (2010)
Visualizing the Chaotic Body in Popular Culture (/isis/citation/CBB001567170/)

Book Carin Berkowitz; Bernard Lightman; (2017)
Science Museums in Transition: Cultures of Display in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America (/isis/citation/CBB922082803/)

Article Kelly Krause; (2016)
A Framework for Visual Communication at Nature (/isis/citation/CBB025509663/)

Book Miira B. Hill; (2022)
The New Art of Old Public Science Communication: The Science Slam (/isis/citation/CBB847395771/)

Article Sara Moreno-Tarín; Tatiana Pina; Martí Domínguez; (2021)
Worlds apart, drawn together: Bears, penguins and biodiversity in climate change cartoons (/isis/citation/CBB022827263/)

Article Siemsen, Hayo; (2010)
The Mach-Planck Debate Revisited: Democratization of Science or Elite Knowledge? (/isis/citation/CBB001034670/)

Article Jan Domaradzki; (2023)
From evil demiurge to caring hero: images of geneticists in the movies (/isis/citation/CBB948371310/)

Book Phillip Thurtle; (2018)
Biology in the Grid: Graphic Design and the Envisioning of Life (/isis/citation/CBB037497817/)

Thesis Kessler, Elizabeth A.; (2006)
Spacescapes: Romantic Aesthetics and the Hubble Space Telescope Images (/isis/citation/CBB001561649/)

Book Andrew Jewett; (2020)
Science under Fire: Challenges to Scientific Authority in Modern America (/isis/citation/CBB653749085/)

Article Esther M. van Dijk; (2013)
Relevant Features of Science: Values in Conservation Biology (/isis/citation/CBB368775251/)

Authors & Contributors
Krause, Kelly
Tatiana Pina
Zapp, Mike
van Dijk, Esther M.
Domaradzki, Jan
Sara Moreno-Tarín
Journals
Public Understanding of Science
Science as Culture
TG Technikgeschichte
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Science and Education
Publishers
U. of Minnesota Press
University of Pittsburgh Press
Routledge
Oxford University Press
MIT Press
Harvard University Press
Concepts
Public understanding of science
Communication of scientific ideas
Visual representation; visual communication
Science and society
Authority of science
Climate and climatology
People
Planck, Max
Mach, Ernst
Gore, Albert
Callendar, Guy Stewart
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
Modern
20th century, early
Places
Copenhagen (Denmark)
United States
Denmark
Berlin (Germany)
Africa
Institutions
Hubble Space Telescope
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment