IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB728996301

The politics of scaling (February 2022)

Sebastian Pfotenhauer (Author)
Brice Laurent (Author)
Kyriaki Papageorgiou (Author)
Stilgoe, Jack (Author)

Social Studies of Science
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 3-34

DOI: 10.1177/03063127211048945

URI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048945

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Living labs Scalability Technoscience; science and technology studies Case studies Public policy Randomized controlled trials Technological innovation Platform technologies 21st century

A fixation on ‘scaling up’ has captured current innovation discourses and, with it, political and economic life at large. Perhaps most visible in the rise of platform technologies, big data and concerns about a new era of monopolies, scalability thinking has also permeated public policy in the search for solutions to ‘grand societal challenges’, ‘mission-oriented innovation’ or transformations through experimental ‘living labs’. In this paper, we explore this scalability zeitgeist as a key ordering logic of current initiatives in innovation and public policy. We are interested in how the explicit preoccupation with scalability reconfigures political and economic power by invading problem diagnoses and normative understandings of how society and social change function. The paper explores three empirical sites – platform technologies, living labs and experimental development economics – to analyze how scalability thinking is rationalized and operationalized. We suggest that social analysis of science and technology needs to come to terms with the ‘politics of scaling’ as a powerful corollary of the ‘politics of technology’, lest we accept the permanent absence from key sites where decisions about the future are made. We focus in on three constitutive elements of the politics of scaling: solutionism, experimentalism and future-oriented valuation. Our analysis seeks to expand our vocabulary for understanding and questioning current modes of innovation that increasingly value scaling as an end in itself, and to open up new spaces for alternative trajectories of social transformation.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB728996301/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Book Susanne Brucksch; Sasaki, Kaori; (2021)
Humans and devices in medical contexts: case studies from Japan (/isis/citation/CBB737777497/)

Article Elizabeth Ransom; Caitlin Grady; Lauren Trepanier; Carmen Bain; (2023)
Situated Ethics in Development: STS Insights for a Pragmatic Approach to Development Policy and Practice (/isis/citation/CBB917944487/)

Article Koichi Mikami; Arisa Ema; Jusaku Minari; Go Yoshizawa; (2021)
ELSI is Our Next Battlefield (/isis/citation/CBB368945327/)

Article Carsten Ochs; Barbara Büttner; Jörn Lamla; (May 2021)
Trading Social Visibility for Economic Amenability: Data-based Value Translation on a “Health and Fitness Platform” (/isis/citation/CBB474517087/)

Article Renee Rottner; (June 2019)
Working at the boundary: Making space for innovation in a NASA megaproject (/isis/citation/CBB511036761/)

Article Sara M. Grimes; (January 2015)
Configuring the Child Player (/isis/citation/CBB047050197/)

Article Junhui Han; Zhengfeng Li; (June 2018)
How Metrics-Based Academic Evaluation Could Systematically Induce Academic Misconduct: A Case Study (/isis/citation/CBB909005401/)

Article Ross, Philippe; (April 2011)
Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences (/isis/citation/CBB722647017/)

Article Alice Street; (December 2011)
Artefacts of not-knowing: The medical record, the diagnosis and the production of uncertainty in Papua New Guinean biomedicine (/isis/citation/CBB480850883/)

Article le Dantec, Christopher A.; DiSalvo, Carl; (February 2013)
Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design (/isis/citation/CBB503495516/)

Article Alexander Rushforth; Thomas Franssen; Sarah de Rijcke; (2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)

Article Poonam Pandey; Aviram Sharma; (2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India (/isis/citation/CBB915250388/)

Article Marianne de Laet; Annelieke Driessen; Else Vogel; (December 2021)
Thinking with attachments: Appreciating a generative analytic (/isis/citation/CBB485499768/)

Book Andreas R. D. Sanders; Sandvik, Pål Thonstad; Espen Storli; (2019)
The political economy of resource regulation: an international and comparative history, 1850-2015 (/isis/citation/CBB481652934/)

Article Cristiano B. Moura; Matheus Monteiro Nascimento; Nathan Willig Lima; (2021)
Epistemic and Political Confrontations Around the Public Policies to Fight COVID-19 Pandemic (/isis/citation/CBB979964202/)

Article Moa Carlsson; (April 2022)
Computing views, remodeling environments (/isis/citation/CBB726932342/)

Article Andreas Folkers; Sven Opitz; (June 2022)
Low-carbon cows: From microbial metabolism to the symbiotic planet (/isis/citation/CBB874316885/)

Article Paloma Sanchez; María Eugenia Sanchez; (2022)
Social design, whitening and epistemicide: A Mexican case (/isis/citation/CBB639763874/)

Article Dingmar van Eck; Erik Weber; (2021)
Assessing Function Modeling Frameworks: Technical Advantage Predictions as a Conceptual Tool (/isis/citation/CBB209420903/)

Article Alex Beattie; (March 2022)
From Poacher to Protector of Attention: The Therapeutic Turn of Persuasive Technology and Ethics of a Smartphone Habit-breaking Application (/isis/citation/CBB825208531/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}