Article ID: CBB722391619

Rawls’s Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks (May 2018)

unapi

The introduction of new technologies in society is sometimes met with public resistance. Supported by public policy calls for “upstream engagement” and “responsible innovation,” recent years have seen a notable rise in attempts to attune research and innovation processes to societal needs, so that stakeholders’ concerns are taken into account in the design phase of technology. Both within the social sciences and in the ethics of technology, we see many interdisciplinary collaborations being initiated that aim to address tensions between various normative expectations about science and engineering and the actual outcomes. However, despite pleas to integrate social science research into the ethics of technology, effective normative models for assessing technologies are still scarce. Rawls’s wide reflective equilibrium (WRE) is often mentioned as a promising approach to integrate insights from the social sciences in the normative analysis of concrete cases, but an in-depth discussion of how this would work in practice is still lacking. In this article, we explore to what extent the WRE method can be used in the context of technology development. Using cases in engineering and technology development, we discuss three issues that are currently neglected in the applied ethics literature on WRE. The first issue concerns the operationalization of abstract background theories to moral principles. The second issue concerns the inclusiveness of the method and the demand for openness. The third issue is how to establish whether or not an equilibrium has been reached. These issues should be taken into account when applying the methods to real-world cases involving technological risks. Applying the WRE method in the context of engaged interdisciplinary collaboration requires sensitivity for issues of power and representativeness to properly deal with the dynamics between the technical and normative researchers involved as well as society at large.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB722391619/

Similar Citations

Book Sheila Jasanoff; (2016)
The ethics of invention : Technology and the human future (/isis/citation/CBB934940191/)

Article Benjamin K. Sovacool; David J. Hess; (October 2017)
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change (/isis/citation/CBB756258184/)

Article Christopher L. Cummings; Agnes S. F. Chuah; Shirley S. Ho; (September 2018)
Protection Motivation and Communication through Nanofood Labels: Improving Predictive Capabilities of Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Nanofoods (/isis/citation/CBB867911612/)

Article Cymene Howe; Jessica Lockrem; Hannah Appel; Edward Hackett; Dominic Boyer; Randal Hall; Matthew Schneider-Mayerson; Albert Pope; Akhil Gupta; Elizabeth Rodwell; Andrea Ballestero; Trveor Durbin; Farès el-Dahdah; Elizabeth Long; Cyrus Mody; (2016)
Paradoxical Infrastructures: Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk (/isis/citation/CBB477865395/)

Article Sheila Jasanoff; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (December 2017)
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures (/isis/citation/CBB640965055/)

Article Mike Michael; (November 2018)
On “Aesthetic Publics”: The Case of VANTAblack® (/isis/citation/CBB312320431/)

Book A. Balmer; K. Bulpin; S. Molyneux-Hodgson; (2016)
Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices (/isis/citation/CBB471073110/)

Article Boaz Miller; (January 2021)
Is Technology Value-Neutral? (/isis/citation/CBB234510402/)

Article Tom Kane; Nick Novelli; (March 2019)
Technology for Governance, Politics, and Democracy [Special Issue Introduction] (/isis/citation/CBB355109142/)

Article Efrain O'Neill-Carrillo; Emmanuel Mercado; Oscar Luhring; Isaac Jordan; Agustin Irizarry-Rivera; (September 2019)
Community Energy Projects in the Caribbean: Advancing Socio-Economic Development and Energy Transitions (/isis/citation/CBB741220720/)

Article Peter Andras; Lukas Esterle; Michael Guckert; The Anh Han; Peter R. Lewis; Kristina Milanovic; Terry Payne; Cedric Perret; Jeremy Pitt; Simon T. Powers; Neil Urquhart; Simon Wells; (December 2018)
Trusting Intelligent Machines: Deepening Trust Within Socio-Technical Systems (/isis/citation/CBB573643849/)

Article Albert Munoz; (December 2019)
Microgrids for Disaster Management: An Ethical Risk Perspective (/isis/citation/CBB644178097/)

Book Jon A. Leydens; Lucena, Juan C.; (2018)
Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice (/isis/citation/CBB400900880/)

Book Mark Coeckelbergh; (2020)
AI Ethics (/isis/citation/CBB990965100/)

Article Baird, Davis; Schummer, Joachim; (2005)
Editorial (/isis/citation/CBB000630293/)

Article Engdahl, Emma; Lidskog, Rolf; (2014)
Risk, Communication and Trust: Towards an Emotional Understanding of Trust (/isis/citation/CBB001420113/)

Article Escobar, Maria Paula; Demeritt, David; (2014)
Flooding and the Framing of Risk in British Broadsheets, 1985--2010 (/isis/citation/CBB001420076/)

Authors & Contributors
Coeckelbergh, Mark
Jasanoff, Sheila
Neil Urquhart
Appel, Hannah
The Anh Han
Ho, Shirley S.
Concepts
Technology and ethics
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Risk
Philosophy of technology
Sociotechnical systems
Technological innovation
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Places
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Puerto Rico
United States
Caribbean
Great Britain
Institutions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment