Article ID: CBB710171767

Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science (2019)

unapi

I consider the motives of historians devising counterfactual histories, analyze the narrative structure of these histories, and assess their merits. Richard Evans attacked counterfactual histories as motivated by wishful thinking. And he claimed that they could not contribute anything to the understanding of the past because they are concerned “with pointing out supposedly preferable alternatives.” Both claims can be refuted with two particular counterfactual histories of biology. An analysis of the narrative structure of counterfactual histories suggests objective criteria that can distinguish those that have been designed, in order to reach a certain narrative ending, from those that were open-ended at the beginning. These criteria are then applied to two examples from the history of biology: Bowler's Darwin Deleted and Radick's ‘Other Histories, Other Biologies.’ Radick did not determine his counterfactual in advance, to meet a certain narrative ending. This refutes the first claim (wishful thinking). Bowler self-avowedly did design his counterfactual in advance, but its narrative ending still contributes to understanding. In particular, it shows that the idea of natural selection is not necessarily associated with its social discontents. This refutes the second claim (cannot contribute to understanding).

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB710171767/

Similar Citations

Article Hu, Zonggang; (2011)
Tong Te-Kong and Oral History of Science Works (/isis/citation/CBB001221317/)

Article Luca Tambolo; (2020)
An unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science (/isis/citation/CBB925918030/)

Article Stephen J. Weininger; (2022)
“The Poor Sister:” Coming to Grips with Recent and Contemporary Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB175973451/)

Article Hallvard J. Fossheim; (2019)
Past responsibility: History and the ethics of research on ethnic groups (/isis/citation/CBB562849198/)

Article Peter J. T. Morris; Jeffrey I. Seeman; (2022)
The Importance of Plurality and Mutual Respect in the Practice of the History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB375881495/)

Article Joachim L. Dagg; (2017)
How counterfactuals of Red-Queen theory shed light on science and its historiography (/isis/citation/CBB638039701/)

Article Thierry Hoquet; (2021)
Pluralizing Darwin: Making Counter-Factual History of Science Significant (/isis/citation/CBB581465929/)

Article Jeffrey I. Seeman; (2022)
Remote Interviewing and the History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB903379745/)

Article Robert Bud; (2016)
Representing scale: What should be special about the heritage of mass science? (/isis/citation/CBB100969947/)

Article David Rabouin; Anne-Lise Rey; (2022)
La science classique dans la Revue d’histoire des sciences (/isis/citation/CBB509066510/)

Article Duan, Lian; (2011)
Museums of Natural Science and Technology and Oral History (/isis/citation/CBB001221318/)

Article Paul Merchant; (2019)
What Oral Historians and Historians of Science Can Learn from Each Other (/isis/citation/CBB829034696/)

Article Wang, Yangzong; (2011)
The Chinese Way in Science and the Oral History of Modern Science in China (/isis/citation/CBB001221315/)

Article William H. Brock; (2022)
The Long and Short of It: The Future Writing of History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB683831416/)

Article Fan, Fa-ti; Yuan, Jian; (2012)
Views and Reflections on Doing the History of Science: Interview with Fan Fa-ti (/isis/citation/CBB001200187/)

Authors & Contributors
Tambolo, Luca
Seeman, Jeffrey I.
Dagg, Joachim
Wehrheim, Lino
Merchant, Paul
Buchner, Michael
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Bulletin for the History of Chemistry
Chinese Journal for the History of Science and Technology
Revue d'Histoire des Sciences
Ziran Kexueshi Yanjiu (Studies in the History of Natural Sciences)
Synthese
Concepts
Historical method
History of science, as a discipline
Historians of science, modern
Counterfactual history
Historiography
Oral history
People
Tong, Te-Kong
Darwin, Charles Robert
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Qing dynasty (China, 1644-1912)
Early modern
19th century
Places
China
Institutions
Science History Institute (SHI)
History of Science Society
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment