Cool, Alison (Author)
Social Studies of Science
Volume: 49
Issue: 4
Pages: 503-530
Edition Details: Special Issue: From Person to Population and Back: Exploring Accountability in Public Health
Language: English
On May 25, 2018, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force. EU citizens are granted more control over personal data while companies and organizations are charged with increased responsibility enshrined in broad principles like transparency and accountability. Given the scope of the regulation, which aims to harmonize data practices across 28 member states with different concerns about data collection, the GDPR has significant consequences for individuals in the EU and globally. While the GDPR is primarily intended to regulate tech companies, it also has important implications for data use in scientific research. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with researchers, lawyers and legal scholars in Sweden, I argue that the GDPR’s flexible accountability principle effectively encourages researchers to reflect on their ethical responsibility but can also become a source of anxiety and produce unexpected results. Many researchers I spoke with expressed profound uncertainty about ‘impossible’ legal requirements for research data use. Despite the availability of legal texts and interpretations, I suggest we should take researchers’ concerns about ‘unknowable’ data law seriously. Many researchers’ sense of legal ambiguity led them to rethink their data practices and themselves as ethical subjects through an orientation to what they imagined as the ‘real people behind the data’, variously formulated as a Swedish population desiring data use for social benefit or a transnational public eager for research results. The intentions attributed to people, populations and publics – whom researchers only encountered in the abstract form of data – lent ethical weight to various and sometimes conflicting decisions about data security and sharing. Ultimately, researchers’ anxieties about their inability to discern the desires of the ‘real people’ lent new appeal to solutions, however flawed, that promised to alleviate the ethical burden of personal data.
...MoreArticle Klaus Hoeyer; Susanne Bauer; Martyn Pickersgill (August 2019) Datafication and accountability in public health: Introduction to a special issue. Social Studies of Science (pp. 459-475).
Similar Citations
Article
Kjetil Rommetveit;
Niels van Dijk;
(2022)
Privacy engineering and the techno-regulatory imaginary
Article
Sarah Wadmann;
Amalie Martinus Hauge;
(August 2021)
Strategies of stratification: Regulating market access in the era of personalized medicine
Article
Klaus Hoeyer;
(July 2015)
Regulatory Anatomy: How “Safety Logics” Structure European Transplant Medicine
Article
Melanie G. Wiber;
Allain Barnett;
(2023)
(Re)Assembling Marine Space: Lobster Fishing Areas under Conditions of Technological and Legal Change in Atlantic Canada
Article
Malte Ziewitz;
(October 2019)
Rethinking gaming: The ethical work of optimization in web search engines
Article
Bruno Oliveira Martins;
(2023)
Security knowledges: Circulation, control, and responsible research and innovation in EU border management
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2022)
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review
Article
Kruse, Corinna;
(October 2013)
The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility
Book
Brett Frischmann;
Evan Selinger;
(2016)
Re-Engineering Humanity
Book
Brian Jordan Jefferson;
(2020)
Digitize and Punish: racial criminalization in the digital age
Book
Carola Harders Richter;
Antonakis, Anna;
(2018)
Digital Media and the Politics of Transformation in the Arab World and Asia
Article
Filip, Florin Gheorgie;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique;
(Winter 2014)
Big Data in the European Union
Article
Caroline Lucas;
(March 2019)
The Democracy Lag: Updating Electoral Law and the Need for a Digital Bill of Rights [Opinion]
Article
Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir;
Kjetil Rommetveit;
(2017)
The Biometric Imaginary: (dis)trust in a Policy Vacuum
Article
Lyria Bennett Moses;
(September 2018)
Is Your Algorithm Dangerous?
Book
Ethem Alpaydın;
(2021)
Machine Learning
Book
Teresa Numerico;
(2021)
Big data e algoritmi. Prospettive critiche
Article
Peter M. Asaro;
(June 2019)
AI Ethics in Predictive Policing: From Models of Threat to an Ethics of Care
Article
Waldemar Kuligowski;
(March 2019)
How “Poland Entered Europe”: The Motorway as a Space of Neoliberalism
Book
Karel Martens;
(2017)
Transport Justice: Designing fair transportation systems
Be the first to comment!