Article ID: CBB705578883

Embodied ephemeralities: Methodologies and historiographies for investigating the display and spatialization of science and technology in the twentieth century (2021)

unapi

Exhibitions are embodied knowledge, and the processes of making exhibitions are also in themselves knowledge production practices. Science and technology exhibitions are therefore doubly of interest to historians of science: both as epistemic agents and as research methods. Yet both exhibitions and exhibition-making practices are ephemeral, as is the subsequent experience of the visitor. How can we research, interrogate, and understand both the productive creation of exhibitions and the phenomenologies and epistemologies of their reception and impact? “Exhibition histories” has become a significant field of late, most closely associated with research on art exhibitions but also extending to world and trade fairs, and now increasingly crossing over into histories of science and technology. It is not an easy task: the range of exhibition archive materials includes – but is not limited to – 35mm slides, architectural blueprints, models, drawings, briefs, memos, budgets, press films, reviews, and personal accounts. This primary material is distributed unevenly across public and organized repositories, closed commercial archives, the personal papers of designers, often embargoed national bureaus of information, and more. Further, the experience of visiting an exhibition leaves far fewer traces to follow, requiring the researcher to do different kinds of things with the same widely varied material. This paper proposes methodologies for historians of science and technology wishing to understand the spatialization of science in exhibition contexts, the impacts of science exhibitions, and the more elusive phenomenological aspects of the exhibition visitor experience. Historians of science must accurately historicize context while researching both along and against the grain of archival material left by the making of exhibitions, as well as understanding the embodied trajectories of visitors. The practice of making exhibitions can also offer the researcher critically valuable insights into what to look for – and what may be absent – in archival records.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB705578883/

Similar Citations

Article Ana Simões; Antonio Sánchez; (2020-12-01)
Introduction: The Fabulous 1930s in the History of Science and Technology (/isis/citation/CBB183695658/)

Article Subrata Dasgupta; (2021)
Whiggism, creativity and the historiography of technoscience (/isis/citation/CBB848900254/)

Article Klaus Staubermann; (2018)
Musem Research Databases for the History of Science and Technology (Research Brief) (/isis/citation/CBB139799230/)

Article Jens Ivo Engels; (July 2022)
Rhythm Analysis: A Heuristic Tool for Historical Infrastructure Research (/isis/citation/CBB181771307/)

Article Barkha Kagliwal; (2023)
A Historian of Technology Watches "The King, His Kitchen, and Other Stories" (/isis/citation/CBB701542926/)

Article Robert; Kokowski Fox; (2017)
Historiography of Science and Technology in Focus. A Discussion with Professor Robert Fox (/isis/citation/CBB273717502/)

Chapter Antonio Sánchez; Henrique Leitão; (2021)
O mundo ibérico e a ciência moderna: uma mudança de narrativa (/isis/citation/CBB958770842/)

Article Eric F. Luckey; (2020)
The Psychologist's Biographer: Writing Lives in the History of Psychology (/isis/citation/CBB629029968/)

Article Sven Dupré; Geert Somsen; (2019)
The History of Knowledge and the Future of Knowledge Societies (/isis/citation/CBB931053546/)

Article Peter J. T. Morris; Jeffrey I. Seeman; (2022)
The Importance of Plurality and Mutual Respect in the Practice of the History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB375881495/)

Article J. C. Pinto de Oliveira; (2020)
Kuhn, Condorcet, and Comte: On the Justification of the "Old" Historiography of Science (/isis/citation/CBB123737042/)

Article Herman Paul; (2016)
Sources of the Self: Scholarly Personae as Repertoires of Scholarly Selfhood (/isis/citation/CBB535916159/)

Article Agnes Bolinska; Joseph D. Martin; (2021)
The tragedy of the canon; or, path dependence in the history and philosophy of science (/isis/citation/CBB130981946/)

Article Smith, Pamela H.; (2009)
Science on the Move: Recent Trends in the History of Early Modern Science (/isis/citation/CBB001030624/)

Book Gavroglu, Kostas; (2007)
O Passado das Ciências como História (/isis/citation/CBB001024300/)

Article Pyenson, Lewis; (2008)
Forward Into the Past (/isis/citation/CBB000931136/)

Article Wahrig, Bettina; (2009)
Weitwinkel - Nahaufnahme: Zeitperspektiven in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (/isis/citation/CBB000932095/)

Article Turchetti, Simone; Herran, Néstor; Boudia, Soraya; (2012)
Introduction: Have We Ever Been “Transnational”? Towards a History of Science across and beyond Borders (/isis/citation/CBB001200070/)

Authors & Contributors
Sánchez, Antonio
Leitão, Henrique
Agnes Bolinska
Luckey, Eric F.
Kagliwal, Barkha
Kharlamova, Vera I.
Journals
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Technology and Culture
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studia Historiae Scientiarum
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review
Renaissance Quarterly
Publishers
Tinta da China
Porto Editora
Concepts
Historiography
History of science, as a discipline
Historical method
History of technology, as a discipline
Research methods
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
People
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Fox, Robert
Butterfield, Herbert
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
19th century
17th century
20th century, early
18th century
Places
Portugal
South Asia
Spain
Europe
India
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment