Article ID: CBB705578883

Embodied ephemeralities: Methodologies and historiographies for investigating the display and spatialization of science and technology in the twentieth century (2021)

unapi

Exhibitions are embodied knowledge, and the processes of making exhibitions are also in themselves knowledge production practices. Science and technology exhibitions are therefore doubly of interest to historians of science: both as epistemic agents and as research methods. Yet both exhibitions and exhibition-making practices are ephemeral, as is the subsequent experience of the visitor. How can we research, interrogate, and understand both the productive creation of exhibitions and the phenomenologies and epistemologies of their reception and impact? “Exhibition histories” has become a significant field of late, most closely associated with research on art exhibitions but also extending to world and trade fairs, and now increasingly crossing over into histories of science and technology. It is not an easy task: the range of exhibition archive materials includes – but is not limited to – 35mm slides, architectural blueprints, models, drawings, briefs, memos, budgets, press films, reviews, and personal accounts. This primary material is distributed unevenly across public and organized repositories, closed commercial archives, the personal papers of designers, often embargoed national bureaus of information, and more. Further, the experience of visiting an exhibition leaves far fewer traces to follow, requiring the researcher to do different kinds of things with the same widely varied material. This paper proposes methodologies for historians of science and technology wishing to understand the spatialization of science in exhibition contexts, the impacts of science exhibitions, and the more elusive phenomenological aspects of the exhibition visitor experience. Historians of science must accurately historicize context while researching both along and against the grain of archival material left by the making of exhibitions, as well as understanding the embodied trajectories of visitors. The practice of making exhibitions can also offer the researcher critically valuable insights into what to look for – and what may be absent – in archival records.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB705578883/

Similar Citations

Article Subrata Dasgupta; (2021)
Whiggism, creativity and the historiography of technoscience (/isis/citation/CBB848900254/)

Article Ana Simões; Antonio Sánchez; (2020-12-01)
Introduction: The Fabulous 1930s in the History of Science and Technology (/isis/citation/CBB183695658/)

Article Klaus Staubermann; (2018)
Musem Research Databases for the History of Science and Technology (Research Brief) (/isis/citation/CBB139799230/)

Article Jens Ivo Engels; (July 2022)
Rhythm Analysis: A Heuristic Tool for Historical Infrastructure Research (/isis/citation/CBB181771307/)

Article Barkha Kagliwal; (2023)
A Historian of Technology Watches "The King, His Kitchen, and Other Stories" (/isis/citation/CBB701542926/)

Essay Review Stéphane Van Damme; (2018)
What (Good) Is Cultural History for History of Science Today? Perspectives, Challenges, Concerns (/isis/citation/CBB186419344/)

Article Thomas Teo; Gordana Jovanović; Martin Dege; (2021)
Motivated historiography: Comments on Wolfgang Schönpflug’s reappraisal of German critical psychology (/isis/citation/CBB492216538/)

Article David Larsson Heidenblad; (2018)
Mapping a New History of the Ecological Turn: The Circulation of Environmental Knowledge in Sweden 1967 (/isis/citation/CBB264729520/)

Article Paola Radici Colace; (2013)
Il 'mestiere' di storico. La scrittura della storia dall'opinione alla ricostruzione scientifica (/isis/citation/CBB172173475/)

Essay Review Gianna Katsiampoura; (2022)
An Appraisal of the Current Status of Research on Byzantine Sciences (/isis/citation/CBB107461340/)

Article Otniel E. Dror; Bettina Hitzer; Anja Laukötter; Pilar León-Sanz; (2016)
An Introduction to History of Science and the Emotions (/isis/citation/CBB621984866/)

Article William H. Brock; (2022)
The Long and Short of It: The Future Writing of History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB683831416/)

Article Stephen J. Weininger; (2022)
“The Poor Sister:” Coming to Grips with Recent and Contemporary Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB175973451/)

Article Feest, Uljana; Sturm, Thomas; (2011)
What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology? (/isis/citation/CBB001024687/)

Article Carla Nappi; (2017)
Paying Attention: Early Modern Science Beyond Genealogy (/isis/citation/CBB373564709/)

Authors & Contributors
Heidenblad, David Larsson
Dege, Martin
Kagliwal, Barkha
Kharlamova, Vera I.
Hitzer, Bettina
Jovanovic, Gordana
Concepts
Historiography
History of science, as a discipline
Historical method
History of technology, as a discipline
Research methods
Epistemology
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
19th century
Early modern
Renaissance
Medieval
Places
South Asia
Byzantium
Sweden
Portugal
Greece
Germany
Institutions
Science History Institute (SHI)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment