Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 104
Pages: 61-67
There seems to be an emerging consensus among many philosophers of science that non-epistemic values ought to play a role in the process of scientific reasoning itself. Recently, a number of philosophers have focused on the role of values in scientific classification or taxonomy. Their claim is that a choice of ontology or taxonomic scheme can only be made, or should only be made, by appealing to non-epistemic or social values. In this paper, I take on this “argument from ontological choice,” claiming that it equivocates on the notion of choice. An ontological choice can be understood either in terms of determining which taxonomic scheme is valid, or in terms of deciding which taxonomic scheme to deploy in a given context. I try to show that while the latter can be determined in part by social values, the former ought not to be so determined.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Justin Donhauser;
Jamie Shaw;
(2019)
Knowledge transfer in theoretical ecology: Implications for incommensurability, voluntarism, and pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB535618423/)
Article
Carla Bromberg;
(2018)
History of Science: The Problem of Cataloging, Knowledge Indexing and Information Retrieval in the Digital Space
(/isis/citation/CBB283365853/)
Article
Michèle Gally;
(2021)
D’une bibliothèque, l’autre. La « science » pour les médiévaux
(/isis/citation/CBB952768667/)
Book
Mario Daniels;
John Krige;
(2022)
Knowledge Regulation and National Security in Postwar America
(/isis/citation/CBB238236707/)
Article
Danielle Fauque;
(2016)
La documentation au cœur de la réorganisation de la chimie dans l’entre-deux-guerres: Rôle des sociétés savantes et institutions françaises dans le contexte international
(/isis/citation/CBB145137114/)
Article
Zachary Piso;
Viorel Pâslaru;
(2021)
Introduction to values and pluralism in the environmental sciences: From inferences to institutions
(/isis/citation/CBB702377462/)
Article
Davide Serpico;
Kate E. Lynch;
Theodore M. Porter;
(2023)
New historical and philosophical perspectives on quantitative genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB926411983/)
Article
Rein Vihalemm;
(2016)
Chemistry and the Problem of Pluralism in Science: An Analysis Concerning Philosophical and Scientific Disagreements
(/isis/citation/CBB999713526/)
Article
Leuschner, Anna;
(2012)
Pluralism and Objectivity: Exposing and Breaking a Circle
(/isis/citation/CBB001221678/)
Article
Martin Carrier;
(2017)
Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability
(/isis/citation/CBB489861694/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy
(/isis/citation/CBB740430654/)
Article
Chantelle Marlor;
(2020)
Explaining knowledge pluralisms; the intertwining of culture and materiality
(/isis/citation/CBB344558063/)
Article
Rein Vihalemm;
(2016)
Chemistry, Paradigms, and a View of Epistemic Pluralism: To the Issue of the Nature of Disagreements in Philosophy and in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB608614670/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend’s well-ordered science: how an anarchist distributes funds
(/isis/citation/CBB905453313/)
Article
Sahotra Sarkar;
(2015)
Nagel on Reduction
(/isis/citation/CBB557469066/)
Chapter
JEAN-MARC LÉVY-LEBLOND;
(2016)
On the Plurality of (Theoretical) Worlds
(/isis/citation/CBB014827402/)
Article
Lisa Heller;
(2016)
Between Relativism and Pluralism: Philosophical and Political Relativism in Feyerabend's Late Work
(/isis/citation/CBB660760906/)
Article
Michael Stöltzner;
(2015)
Hilbert's Axiomatic Method and Carnap's General Axiomatics
(/isis/citation/CBB492645981/)
Book
Stephanie Ruphy;
(2017)
Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered: A New Approach to the (Dis)Unity of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB872184691/)
Article
Yiftach Fehige;
(2021)
The Annus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB936300475/)
Be the first to comment!