Robert DJ Smith (Author)
Stefan Schäfer (Author)
Michael J Bernstein (Author)
This article analyses how a recent idiom of innovation governance, ‘responsible innovation’, is enacted in practice, how this shapes innovation processes, and what aspects of innovation are left untouched. Within this idiom, funders typically focus on one point in an innovation system: researchers in projects. However, the more transformational aspirations of responsible innovation are circumscribed by this context. Adopting a mode of critique that assembles, this article considers some alternative approaches to governing the shared trajectories of science, technology, and society. Using the idea of institutional invention to focus innovation governance on four inflection points—agendas, calls, spaces, evaluation—would allow funding organizations and researchers to look ‘beyond the project’, developing new methods to unpack and reflect on assumed purposes of science, technology, and innovation, and to potentially reconfigure the institutions that condition scientific practice.
...More
Chapter
Martin, Ben;
Whitley, Richard;
(2010)
A Case of Regulatory Capture?
(/isis/citation/CBB001420856/)
Book
Charrow, Robert P.;
(2010)
Law in the Laboratory: A Guide to the Ethics of Federally Funded Science Research
(/isis/citation/CBB001022405/)
Book
Orth, Karin;
Oberkrome, Willi;
(2010)
Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1920--1970: Forschungsförderung im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft und Politik
(/isis/citation/CBB001023723/)
Book
Lamoreaux, Naomi R.;
Sokoloff, Kenneth Lee;
(2007)
Financing Innovation in the United States, 1870 to the Present
(/isis/citation/CBB000774188/)
Article
Crosland, Maurice;
(2010)
Pensions for “Cultivators of Science”
(/isis/citation/CBB001031489/)
Article
Shul'gina, I. V.;
(2010)
People, Money, Real Estate: Evolution of Resources for Russian Science, 1990--2007
(/isis/citation/CBB001211371/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
(/isis/citation/CBB181098680/)
Article
Shahar Avin;
(2019)
Mavericks and lotteries
(/isis/citation/CBB954357351/)
Article
Frank N. Laird;
(2020)
Sticky Policies, Dysfunctional Systems: Path Dependency and the Problems of Government Funding for Science in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB444679505/)
Article
König, Ariane;
(2007)
Democratizing Decision-Making on Food Safety in the EU: Closing Gaps between Principles of Governance and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB000830104/)
Article
Jon Agar;
(2020)
What Is Science for? The Lighthill Report on Artificial Intelligence Reinterpreted
(/isis/citation/CBB537652285/)
Book
Erika Behrisch;
(2022)
Discovery, Innovation, and the Victorian Admiralty: Paper Navigators
(/isis/citation/CBB883054576/)
Article
Birch, Kean;
(2013)
The Political Economy of Technoscience: An Emerging Research Agenda
(/isis/citation/CBB001320493/)
Article
Deringer, William Peter;
(2013)
Finding the Money: Public Accounting, Political Arithmetic, and Probability in the 1690s
(/isis/citation/CBB001214721/)
Book
Mann, Alfred K.;
(2000)
For Better or for Worse: The Marriage of Science and Government in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB000100263/)
Article
Rainger, Ronald;
(2000)
Patronage and Science: Roger Revelle, the U. S. Navy, and Oceanography at the Scripps Institution
(/isis/citation/CBB000111887/)
Book
Wolfe, Douglas A.;
(2000)
A history of the federal biological laboratory at Beaufort, North Carolina 1899-1999
(/isis/citation/CBB000111936/)
Book
Chris Turner;
Yves Gingras;
(2014)
Science, on coupe!
(/isis/citation/CBB674310932/)
Article
Yokoyama, Hiromi M.;
Nakayachi, Kazuya;
(2014)
Public Judgment on Science Expenditure in the National Budget of Japan: An Experimental Approach to Examining the Effects of Unpacking Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001420107/)
Article
Csaba Pléh;
(2023)
Changes in Hungarian academic psychology after the end of "people's democracy"
(/isis/citation/CBB283707622/)
Be the first to comment!