Article ID: CBB698793031

Analysis and/or Interpretation in Neurophysiology? A Transatlantic Discussion Between F. J. J. Buytendijk and K. S. Lashley, 1929–1932 (2022)

unapi

In the interwar period, biologists employed a diverse set of holistic approaches that were connected to different research methodologies. Against this background, this article explores attempts in the 1920s and 1930s to negotiate quantitative and qualitative methods in the field of neurophysiology. It focuses on the work of two scientists on different sides of the Atlantic: the Dutch animal psychologist and physiologist Frederik J.J. Buytendijk and the American neuropsychologist Karl S. Lashley, specifically analyzing their critical correspondence, 1929–1932, on the problems surrounding the term intelligence. It discusses the inexplicable anomalies in neurophysiology as well as the reliability of quantitative and qualitative methods. While in his laboratory work Lashley adhered to a strictly analytic approach, Buytendijk tried to combine quantitative methods with phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches. The starting point of their discussion is Lashley’s monograph on Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence (1929) and the rat experiments discussed therein. Buytendijk questioned the viability of the maze-learning method and the use of statistics to test intelligence in animals; he reproduced Lashley’s experiments and then confronted Lashley with his critical findings. In addition to elucidating this exchange, this paper will, more generally, shed light on the nature of the disagreements and shared assumptions prevalent among interwar neurophysiologists. In turn, it contributes to historiographical debates on localization and functionalism and the discrepancy between analytic (quantitative) and interpretative (qualitative) approaches.

...More
Included in

Article Jan Baedke; Christina Brandt (2022) Between the Wars, Facing a Scientific Crisis: The Theoretical and Methodological Bottleneck of Interwar Biology. Journal of the History of Biology (pp. 209-217). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB698793031/

Similar Citations

Book Chantal Grell; (2014)
Correspondance de Johannes Hevelius.Volume 1: Prolégomènes critiques (/isis/citation/CBB265925939/)

Article Tugnoli Pàttaro, Sandra; (2010)
Alle origini della semiotica: Lady Victoria Welby corrispondente di Charles S. Peirce (/isis/citation/CBB001034882/)

Article Bruce, Darryl; (1998)
The Lashley-Hull debate revisited (/isis/citation/CBB000075754/)

Article Weidman, Nadine; (1994)
Mental testing and machine intelligence: The Lashley-Hull debate (/isis/citation/CBB000033500/)

Article Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard; (2006)
Probability in 1919/20: The von Mises-Pólya Controversy (/isis/citation/CBB000671181/)

Article A. W. F. Edwards; (2016)
Punnett's square: A postscript (/isis/citation/CBB278214997/)

Article Santos, Gildo Magalhães; (2011)
A Debate on Magnetic Current: The Troubled Einstein--Ehrenhaft Correspondence (/isis/citation/CBB001024707/)

Article Jan Baedke; Christina Brandt; (2022)
Between the Wars, Facing a Scientific Crisis: The Theoretical and Methodological Bottleneck of Interwar Biology (/isis/citation/CBB174255369/)

Article Van der Veer, René; (2000)
Tamara Dembo's European years: Working with Lewin and Buytendijk (/isis/citation/CBB000110052/)

Book The Editors of the Darwin Correspondence Project; Secord, James A.; Burkhardt, Frederick; Charles Darwin; (2023)
The Correspondence of Charles Darwin: Volume 30, 1882 (/isis/citation/CBB019640041/)

Chapter Finkelstein, Gabriel; (2014)
Emil du Bois-Reymond's Reflections on Consciousness (/isis/citation/CBB001214145/)

Book Clifford Cunningham; (2015)
Discovery of the First Asteroid, Ceres (/isis/citation/CBB814771092/)

Article O. Ellegaard; S. B. F. Dorch; (2022)
Astronomical observatory publications: information exchange before the Internet era (/isis/citation/CBB384040311/)

Article Paul White; (2022)
The Many Lives of Darwin’s Letters (/isis/citation/CBB415627399/)

Chapter Rhodri Lewis; Anna Marie Roos; Gideon Manning; (2023)
Whose Manner of Discourse? Sir William Petty, Civility, and the Early Royal Society (/isis/citation/CBB813427283/)

Authors & Contributors
Grell, Chantal
Darwin Correspondence Project, Editors
Bertil F. Dorch
Ole Ellegaard
Yale, Elizabeth E.
White, Paul S.
Journals
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
Journal of the History of Biology
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage
History of Psychology
Publishers
Brepols
Springer International Publishing
Warburg Institute
Springer
Cambridge University Press
Harvard University
Concepts
Correspondence and corresponding
Communication within scientific contexts
Controversies and disputes
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Methodology of science; scientific method
Scientists
People
Lashley, Karl Spencer
Hull, Clark Leonard
Hevelius, Johannes
Darwin, Charles Robert
Pólya, George
Pauling, Linus Carl
Time Periods
20th century, early
17th century
19th century
20th century
Early modern
Modern
Places
Germany
Europe
Netherlands
Great Britain
Institutions
University of Southern Denmark
University of Copenhagen
Royal Society of London
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment