Warech, Steven (Author)
Tagg, John (Advisor)
This dissertation establishes a novel historiography of hysteria framed as a wide study of Genesis. Specifically exploring and reading together the genesis of ontology, subjectivity, discipline, medicine, psychoanalysis, psychology, neurology, photography, and artificial intelligence. Arguing that Genesis is the fundamental myth of psychoanalysis in that it provides the structure of hysterical subjectivity in the form of knowledge as discipline. Seeking out a radically different understanding of "conversion disorder", "functional neurological disorder", or "dissociative neurological symptom disorder" from the those that have gained traction in contemporary disciplines, the project conceptualizes the serpentine genesis of hysteria in terms of Lacan's hysteric and Nietzsche’s madman. In doing so, it first attempts to take seriously everything that has been said within this history, proceeding from the observation it is all "true". This then begs the question of the status of this truth of hysteria, truth as produced in the discourse of the hysteric, especially as these truths have been violently contradictory. Here a framework is required to account for both the historical specificity of hysteria's symptomatic formations, the radical divergence of symptoms historically, as well as the structure of hysteria, which I argue remains constant. The apparatus and technology of discipline, making an epistemic claim possible by visualizing the as hysteric as specific object of knowledge—be it photography, systems of classification like the ICD or DSM, or contemporary neuro-imaging technologies—does not present the hysteric as such. Rather it paradoxically creates and constructs its object in the act of abstraction through the force of understanding. It is easy to see absurdities of past modes of capture and believe contemporary technologies move us closer to the truth of illness, visualizing and presenting the body as such, overcoming the distance of separation. However, these technologies all belong to the same history. Artificial intelligence is present from genesis in every sense. This is the paradox of the title of the project, where what comes prior to the colon, "the serpentine genesis of hysteria", something of a distant past, is placed in direct relation to what follows, psychoanalysis, photography, and artificial intelligence usually conceptualized as modern apparatuses.
...More
Article
Goncalves, Valeria Portugal;
Ortega, Francisco;
(2013)
Uma nosologia para os fenômenos sobrenaturais e a construção do cérebro “possuído” no século XIX
(/isis/citation/CBB001420645/)
Article
Hane Htut Maung;
(2016)
To what do psychiatric diagnoses refer? A two-dimensional semantic analysis of diagnostic terms
(/isis/citation/CBB007035563/)
Book
Edward Shorter;
Max Fink;
(2018)
The Madness of Fear: A History of Catatonia
(/isis/citation/CBB544899834/)
Article
Hein van den Berg;
(2023)
The essentialism of early modern psychiatric nosology
(/isis/citation/CBB175695180/)
Article
Åsa Jansson;
(2022)
From Melancholia to Depression: Disordered Mood in Nineteenth-Century Psychiatry
(/isis/citation/CBB956265052/)
Article
Hane Htut Maung;
(2016)
Diagnosis and causal explanation in psychiatry
(/isis/citation/CBB953313116/)
Article
Aragona, Massimiliano;
(2013)
Neopositivism and the DSM Psychiatric Classification. An Epistemological History. Part 1: Theoretical Comparison
(/isis/citation/CBB001320328/)
Article
Mauricio V Daker;
(2019)
The theory of symptom complexes, mind and madness
(/isis/citation/CBB264539507/)
Article
Annemarie Jutel;
(2021)
Uncertainty and the inconvenient facts of diagnosis
(/isis/citation/CBB249581784/)
Article
Jonathan Y Tsou;
(2016)
Natural kinds, psychiatric classification and the history of the DSM
(/isis/citation/CBB258474975/)
Article
M. Cristina Amoretti;
Elisabetta Lalumera;
Davide Serpico;
(2021)
The DSM-5 introduction of the Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder as a new mental disorder: A philosophical review
(/isis/citation/CBB881537603/)
Article
Andresen, Christopher Schroeder;
German E Berrios;
(2020)
‘My insanity in the year 1783’, by C.S. Andresen (1801)
(/isis/citation/CBB296326403/)
Book
Allan H. Ropper;
Brian Burrell;
(2019)
How the Brain Lost Its Mind: Sex, Hysteria, and the Riddle of Mental Illness
(/isis/citation/CBB145052886/)
Book
Twentyman, Ralph;
(2004)
Medicine, Mythology, and Spirituality: Recollecting the Past and Willing the Future
(/isis/citation/CBB000650429/)
Article
Mario Augusto Maieron;
(2017)
The Meaning of Madness in Ancient Greek Culture from Homer to Hippocrates and Plato
(/isis/citation/CBB638273311/)
Article
Kyu-hwan Sihn;
(2022)
Distinguishing between neurosis and psychosis: discourses on neurosis in colonial Korea
(/isis/citation/CBB040102801/)
Book
Heather H. Vacek;
(2015)
Madness: American Protestant Responses to Mental Illness
(/isis/citation/CBB007730120/)
Thesis
Schmidt, Jeremy;
(2005)
Melancholy and the Care of the Soul: Religion, Moral Philosophy and Madness in England, 1580--1750
(/isis/citation/CBB001561829/)
Chapter
Pierdaniele Giaretta;
(2021)
Classifications from an Epistemological Point of View with Particular Attention to the Classifications of Diseases
(/isis/citation/CBB537876116/)
Article
Steven Tresker;
(2020)
A typology of clinical conditions
(/isis/citation/CBB690319995/)
Be the first to comment!