Sarathchandra, Dilshani (Author)
Scientists’ risk perceptions play a critical role in determining the risks that they are willing to accept in their work. This study investigates academic bioscientists’ risk perceptions by examining the judgments working scientists employ in day-to-day research decisions. The study draws from theoretical and methodological underpinnings of Sociology of Science and Risk Analysis. Using data gathered from 694 survey responses of bioscientists at a land grant research university in the U.S. Midwest, this study identifies four dimensions of perceived risk (i.e., intellectual challenges, competition, career risks, and societal risks) and demonstrates how these dimensions are associated with a series of demographic, life-course, and contextual factors. Findings indicate that university bioscientists’ subjective risk judgments are shaped by their professional experience, sources of funding, research orientation, professional networks, and perceived significance of research, which in turn may affect their research decisions.
...More
Article
Oliver Todt;
José Luis Luján;
(2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method
(/isis/citation/CBB425178130/)
Book
Vanessa Heggie;
(2019)
Higher and Colder: A History of Extreme Physiology and Exploration
(/isis/citation/CBB963440719/)
Article
María Elena Giraldo;
Eliana Arancibia Gutiérrez;
(2023)
Governance in socio-environmental research: an analysis of multi-stakeholder cooperation mechanisms in two research laboratories in Yucatan, Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB497620424/)
Article
Charles Dupras;
Katie Michelle Saulnier;
Yann Joly;
(October 2019)
Epigenetics, ethics, law and society: A multidisciplinary review of descriptive, instrumental, dialectical and reflexive analyses
(/isis/citation/CBB595581322/)
Book
Maura Phillips Mackowski;
(2022)
Life in Space: NASA Life Sciences Research during the Late Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB318518474/)
Article
Jessica Weinkle;
Roger, Jr. Pielke;
(July 2017)
The Truthiness about Hurricane Catastrophe Models
(/isis/citation/CBB612758874/)
Article
Asma El Ouirdi;
Miriam El Ouirdi;
Jesse Segers;
Ivana Pais;
(2015)
Institutional Predictors of the Adoption of Employee Social Media Policies
(/isis/citation/CBB473729911/)
Article
Kyle Siler;
David Strang;
(January 2017)
Peer Review and Scholarly Originality: Let 1,000 Flowers Bloom, but Don’t Step on Any
(/isis/citation/CBB358441182/)
Article
Shana Lee Hirsch;
Jerrold Long;
(March 2021)
Adaptive Epistemologies: Conceptualizing Adaptation to Climate Change in Environmental Science
(/isis/citation/CBB087611495/)
Article
Dove, William;
Susman, Millard;
(2012)
James F. Crow (1916--2012)
(/isis/citation/CBB001320466/)
Article
Sarah Maria Schönbauer;
(2020)
‘From Bench to Stage’: How Life Scientists’ Leisure Groups Build Collective Self-Care
(/isis/citation/CBB273168566/)
Article
Rachel J. Wilde;
David Guile;
(2021)
Client-facing Interprofessional Project Teams: The Role of Engineers’ ‘Situated Judgment’
(/isis/citation/CBB589787344/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
(/isis/citation/CBB181098680/)
Article
Mariusz Finkielsztein;
Izabela Wagner;
(2023)
The sense of meaninglessness in bureaucratized science
(/isis/citation/CBB307541095/)
Article
Ashley Carse;
(August 2021)
The ecobiopolitics of environmental mitigation: Remaking fish habitat through the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
(/isis/citation/CBB739765199/)
Article
Daniel Steel;
Chad Gonnerman;
Michael O'Rourke;
(2017)
Scientists’ Attitudes on Science and Values: Case Studies and Survey Methods in Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB928094650/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabine Leonelli;
Dagmara Weckowska;
David Castle;
John Dupré;
(2016)
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB530775467/)
Article
Dow Schüll, Natusha;
Zaloom, Caitlin;
(August 2011)
The shortsighted brain: Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time
(/isis/citation/CBB240640662/)
Article
Charles Anthony Bates;
Christian Clausen;
(2020)
Engineering Readiness: How the TRL Figure of Merit Coordinates Technology Development
(/isis/citation/CBB337838016/)
Article
Alexandra Coso Strong;
Tehya Stockman;
Tom Heale;
Steven Meyer;
Elena Meyerson;
(2022)
Persuasive Communication Practices of Engineers in Cross-Boundary Decision-Making
(/isis/citation/CBB458121138/)
Be the first to comment!