John Forrester’s book Thinking in Cases does not provide one ultimate definition of what it means to ‘think in cases’, but rather several alternatives: a ‘style of reasoning’ (Hacking), ‘paradigms’ or ‘exemplars’ (Kuhn), and ‘language games’ (Wittgenstein), to mention only a few. But for Forrester, the stories behind each of the figures who suggested these different models for thinking (in cases) are as important as the models themselves. In other words, the question for Forrester is not only what ‘thinking in cases’ is, but also who might be considered a ‘thinker in cases’. Who could serve as a case study for such a thinker? The major candidates that Forrester considers in his book to be ‘thinkers in cases’ are Kuhn, Foucault, Freud, and Winnicott. In what follows, I will argue that one name is missing from this list, as well as from Forrester’s book more generally: Michael Balint. This name is missing not only because Balint was a great ‘thinker in cases’, but also because we have some reasons to believe that Forrester himself thought so and wished to add him to the list. Forrester, I will argue, found in Balint an exemplar for a thinker in cases that combined elements from Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theory and Foucault’s philosophy of the case-based sciences.
...MoreArticle Chris Millard; Felicity Callard (2020) Thinking in, with, across, and beyond cases with John Forrester. History of the Human Sciences (pp. 3-14).
Similar Citations
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2020)
‘If p? Then What?’ Thinking within, with, and from cases
(/isis/citation/CBB998231894/)
Article
Chris Millard;
Felicity Callard;
(2020)
Thinking in, with, across, and beyond cases with John Forrester
(/isis/citation/CBB867149371/)
Article
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman;
(2020)
On Kuhn’s Case, and Piaget’s: A Critical Two-Sited Hauntology (or, on Impact Without Reference)
(/isis/citation/CBB181812401/)
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2019)
Exemplification and the use-values of cases and case studies
(/isis/citation/CBB151505081/)
Book
Kevin C. Elliott;
Ted Richards;
(2017)
Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB115450433/)
Article
Luca Sciortino;
(2021)
The emergence of objectivity: Fleck, Foucault, Kuhn and Hacking
(/isis/citation/CBB779990178/)
Article
Michael, Michael;
(2008)
On the Validity of Freud's Dream Interpretations
(/isis/citation/CBB000830437/)
Article
Maria Böhmer;
(2020)
The Case as a Travelling Genre
(/isis/citation/CBB149994883/)
Article
Matt ffytche;
(2020)
Throwing the Case Open: The Impossible Subject of Luisa Passerini’s Autobiography of a Generation
(/isis/citation/CBB207134190/)
Article
Julie Walsh;
(2020)
Confusing Cases: Forrester, Stoller, Agnes, Woman
(/isis/citation/CBB971156075/)
Book
Rudnytsky, Peter L.;
(1991)
The psychoanalytic vocation: Rank, Winnicott, and the legacy of Freud
(/isis/citation/CBB000053123/)
Article
Kluzer Usuelli, Almatea;
(1992)
The significance of illusion in the work of Freud and Winnicott: A controversial issue
(/isis/citation/CBB000054862/)
Article
Poskett, James;
(2015)
Forgotten Dreams: Recalling the Patient in British Psychotherapy, 1945--60
(/isis/citation/CBB001552766/)
Article
Michael J. Flexer;
(2020)
If p0, Then 1: The Impossibility of Thinking Out Cases
(/isis/citation/CBB601183479/)
Article
Jacy L. Young;
(2020)
Thinking in Multitudes: Questionnaires and Composite Cases in Early American Psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB385770594/)
Article
Kim M. Hajek;
(2020)
Periodical Amnesia and Dédoublement in Case-Reasoning: Writing Psychological Cases in Late 19th-Century France
(/isis/citation/CBB193345504/)
Article
Alex Beattie;
(March 2022)
From Poacher to Protector of Attention: The Therapeutic Turn of Persuasive Technology and Ethics of a Smartphone Habit-breaking Application
(/isis/citation/CBB825208531/)
Article
Hutton, Joseph;
(2012)
Composite Paradigms in Medicine: Analysing Gillies' Claim of Reclassification of Disease without Paradigm Shift in the Case of Helicobacter pylori
(/isis/citation/CBB001211290/)
Book
Meheus, Joke;
(2002)
Inconsistency in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000201632/)
Chapter
Bachimont, Bruno;
(2008)
Formal Signs and Numerical Computation: Between Intuitionism and Formalism. Critique of Computational Reason
(/isis/citation/CBB000831249/)
Be the first to comment!