Steele, John M. (Author)
Meszaros, E. L. (Author)
Archive for History of Exact Sciences
Volume: 75
Issue: 4
Pages: 415-438
Late Babylonian astronomical texts contain records of the stationary points of the outer planets using three different notational formats: Type S where the position is given relative to a Normal Star and whether it is an eastern or western station is noted, Type I which is similar to Type S except that the Normal Star is replaced by a reference to a zodiacal sign, and Type Z the position is given by reference to a zodiacal sign, but no indication of whether the station is an eastern or western station is included. In these records, the date of the station is sometimes preceded by the terms in and/or EN. We have created a database of station records in order to determine whether there was any pattern in the use of these notation types over time or an association with any bias in the station date or the type of text the station was recorded in. Predictive texts, which include Almanacs and Normal Star Almanacs, almost always use Type Z notation, while the Diaries, compilations, and Goal-Year Texts use all three types. Type Z records almost never include in or EN, while other types seem to include these interchangeably. When compared with modern computed station dates, the records show bias toward earlier dates, suggesting that the Babylonians were observing dates when the planets appeared to stop moving rather than the true station. Overlapping reports, where a station on the same date was recorded in two or more texts, suggest that predicted station dates were used to guide observations, and that the planet’s position on the predicted stationary date was the true point of the observation rather than the specific date of the stationary point.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Teije de Jong;
(2021)
A study of Babylonian planetary theory III. The planet Mercury
Article
John Steele;
(2018)
The Development of the Babylonian Zodiac: Some Preliminary Observations
Article
Teije de Jong;
(2019)
A Study of Babylonian Planetary Theory II. The Planet Venus
Article
Teije de Jong;
Hermann Hunger;
(2020)
Babylonian observations of a unique planetary configuration
Article
Kosso, Peter;
(2013)
Void Points, Rosettes, and a Brief History of Planetary Astronomy
Article
Yasuyuki Mitsuma;
(2015)
From Preliminary Diaries to Short Diaries: The First and Second Steps in the Compilation Process of the Late Babylonian Astronomical Diaries
Article
Stern, Sacha;
(2008)
The Babylonian Month and the New Moon: Sighting and Prediction
Essay Review
Van Brummelen, Glen;
(2013)
[Essay review]
Article
Steele, J. M.;
Gray, J. M. K.;
(2007)
A Study of Babylonian Observations Involving the Zodiac
Article
John Steele;
(2019)
An Early Compilation of Saturn Observations from Babylon
Article
Britton, John P.;
(2009)
Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part II. Treatments of Lunar Anomaly
Article
Brack-Bernsen, Lis;
Hunger, Hermann;
(2002)
TU 11: A Collection of Rules for the Prediction of Lunar Phases and of Month Lengths
Article
Duke, Dennis;
(2010)
Greek Angles from Babylonian Numbers
Article
Fritz Krafft;
(2016)
Begriffsverfälschungen durch vermeintlich modernisierende Übersetzungen: Das Beispiel ‚orbis‘ (Kugel, Sphäre) ‚orbita‘ (Bahn)
Article
Quan Tang 唐泉;
Zhenhua Wang 王振華;
(2025)
Research on the Expansion-Contraction Difference and Limit Degree in ancient Chinese planetary theory: The case of outer planets
Article
S. Mohammad Mozaffari;
(2019)
The Orbital Elements of Venus in Medieval Islamic Astronomy: Interaction Between Traditions and the Accuracy of Observations
Article
Christián C. Carman;
(2021)
The gravitational influence of Jupiter on the Ptolemaic value for the eccentricity of Saturn
Article
Sahana Cidambi;
Clemency Montelle;
Kim Plofker;
(2024)
Astronomical handbooks in 16th-century South Asia: Analysis of mean planetary motions in the 1520 Graha-lāghava of Gaṇeśa Daivajña
Book
B.S. Shylaja;
Seetharama Javagal;
(2021)
Gaṇitagannaḍ: Mirror of Mathematics, An Astronomy Text of 1604 CE in Kannada by Śankaranārāyana Joisaru of Śṛngeri
Book
Francesca Rochberg;
(2017)
Before Nature: Cuneiform Knowledge and the History of Science
Be the first to comment!