How do “international” epistemic communities shape regulatory contests between transnational firms and civil society organizations in the Global South? With the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO), member states committed to basing trade-restrictive national regulations on science-based “international” standards set by “international” standard-setting bodies. Yet we know little about how the WTO regime has shaped the operation of epistemic communities within standard-setting bodies and, in turn, how standard-setting bodies articulate with national policy-making processes in the Global South. Building on work in the new political sociology of science, I argue that neoliberal globalization and the establishment of the WTO have created incentives for Western epistemic communities to at once cast themselves as “international” under the WTO regime and orient their scientific agendas toward the priorities of transnational firms. Moreover, this transformation of epistemic communities has created opportunities for transnational firms facing contentious policy environments in the Global South to effectively outsource regulatory decision-making to “international” epistemic communities that can claim legal status under the WTO regime. Empirically, I focus on the case of one Western epistemic community—the Association of Analytical Communities International—and its claim to epistemic jurisdiction over pesticide residue standards for soft drinks in India.
...More
Article
Ruha Benjamin;
(November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
(/isis/citation/CBB856025239/)
Article
Nassim JafariNaimi;
(March 2018)
Our Bodies in the Trolley’s Path, or Why Self-driving Cars Must *Not* Be Programmed to Kill
(/isis/citation/CBB556129964/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
(/isis/citation/CBB069762669/)
Article
Roderic N. Crooks;
(2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB487672024/)
Article
Mattia Andreoletti;
David Teira;
(2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation?
(/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)
Article
Ashlyn Jaeger;
(2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain
(/isis/citation/CBB770211028/)
Article
Jenny Andersson;
Erik Westholm;
(2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders
(/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)
Article
Alexander Rushforth;
Thomas Franssen;
Sarah de Rijcke;
(2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups
(/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)
Article
Natasha D. Schüll;
(March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)
Article
Robert G. W. Kirk;
(July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research
(/isis/citation/CBB661013428/)
Article
Brian Salter;
(January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)
Article
David Moats;
Liz McFall;
(2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools
(/isis/citation/CBB339833803/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Poonam Pandey;
Aviram Sharma;
(2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India
(/isis/citation/CBB915250388/)
Article
Colleen Lanier-Christensen;
(September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
(/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)
Article
Erin A. Cech;
Anneke Metz;
Jessie L. Smith;
Karen deVries;
(September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students
(/isis/citation/CBB816459691/)
Article
Rahul Mukherjee;
(September 2016)
Toxic Lunch in Bhopal and Chemical Publics
(/isis/citation/CBB753030836/)
Article
Maria do Mar Pereira;
(2019)
Boundary-work that Does Not Work: Social Inequalities and the Non-performativity of Scientific Boundary-work
(/isis/citation/CBB949567754/)
Be the first to comment!