Article ID: CBB678564374

Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India (2019)


How do “international” epistemic communities shape regulatory contests between transnational firms and civil society organizations in the Global South? With the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO), member states committed to basing trade-restrictive national regulations on science-based “international” standards set by “international” standard-setting bodies. Yet we know little about how the WTO regime has shaped the operation of epistemic communities within standard-setting bodies and, in turn, how standard-setting bodies articulate with national policy-making processes in the Global South. Building on work in the new political sociology of science, I argue that neoliberal globalization and the establishment of the WTO have created incentives for Western epistemic communities to at once cast themselves as “international” under the WTO regime and orient their scientific agendas toward the priorities of transnational firms. Moreover, this transformation of epistemic communities has created opportunities for transnational firms facing contentious policy environments in the Global South to effectively outsource regulatory decision-making to “international” epistemic communities that can claim legal status under the WTO regime. Empirically, I focus on the case of one Western epistemic community—the Association of Analytical Communities International—and its claim to epistemic jurisdiction over pesticide residue standards for soft drinks in India.

Citation URI

Similar Citations

Article Nassim JafariNaimi; (March 2018)
Our Bodies in the Trolley’s Path, or Why Self-driving Cars Must *Not* Be Programmed to Kill (/isis/citation/CBB556129964/) unapi

Article Ruha Benjamin; (November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics (/isis/citation/CBB856025239/) unapi

Article Barbara L. Allen; (November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region (/isis/citation/CBB069762669/) unapi

Article Roderic N. Crooks; (2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice (/isis/citation/CBB487672024/) unapi

Article Mattia Andreoletti; David Teira; (2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? (/isis/citation/CBB881753075/) unapi

Article Ashlyn Jaeger; (2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain (/isis/citation/CBB770211028/) unapi

Article Jenny Andersson; Erik Westholm; (2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders (/isis/citation/CBB589179620/) unapi

Article Robert G. W. Kirk; (July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research (/isis/citation/CBB661013428/) unapi

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/) unapi

Article David Moats; Liz McFall; (2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools (/isis/citation/CBB339833803/) unapi

Article Alexander Rushforth; Thomas Franssen; Sarah de Rijcke; (2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (/isis/citation/CBB805796865/) unapi

Article Poonam Pandey; Aviram Sharma; (2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India (/isis/citation/CBB915250388/) unapi

Article Erin A. Cech; Anneke Metz; Jessie L. Smith; Karen deVries; (September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students (/isis/citation/CBB816459691/) unapi

Article Sara Giordano; (May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics (/isis/citation/CBB369714455/) unapi

Article Rahul Mukherjee; (September 2016)
Toxic Lunch in Bhopal and Chemical Publics (/isis/citation/CBB753030836/) unapi

Article Arne Pollock; Banu Subramaniam; (November 2016)
Introduction to Special Issue: Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences (/isis/citation/CBB706070191/) unapi

Article Maria do Mar Pereira; (2019)
Boundary-work that Does Not Work: Social Inequalities and the Non-performativity of Scientific Boundary-work (/isis/citation/CBB949567754/) unapi

Article Allain J. Barnett; Melanie G. Wiber; (2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015) (/isis/citation/CBB359628559/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Allen, Barbara L.
Moats, David
McFall, Liz
Barnett, Allain J.
Wiber, Melanie G.
Giordano, Sara
Science, Technology and Human Values
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Power (social sciences)
United States
Bhopal, India
21st century
20th century
Disaster Management Institute (Bhopal India)
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment