Psychologists in the early years of the discipline were much concerned with the stimulus-error. Roughly, this is the problem encountered in introspective experiments when subjects are liable to frame their perceptual reports in terms of what they know of the stimulus, instead of just drawing on their perceptual experiences as they are supposedly felt. “Introspectionist” psychologist E. B. Titchener and his student E. G. Boring both argued in the early 20th century that the stimulus-error is a serious methodological pit-fall. While many of the theoretical suppositions motivating Titchener and Boring have been unfashionable since the rise of behaviourism, the stimulus-error brings our attention to one matter of perennial importance to psychophysics and the psychology of perception. This is the fact that subjects are liable to give different kinds of perceptual reports in response to the same stimulus. I discuss attempts to control for variable reports in recent experimental work on colour and lightness constancy, and the disputes that have arisen over which kinds of reports are legitimate. Some contemporary psychologists do warn us against a stimulus-error, even though they do not use this terminology. I argue that concern over the stimulus-error is diagnostic of psychologists' deep theoretical commitments, such as their conception of sensation, or their demarcation of perception from cognition. I conclude by discussing the relevance of this debate to current philosophy of perception.
...More
Article
Gruba-McCallister, Frank P.;
(1978)
Efficient causality in Boring's work and thought: A case of one-sided determinism
(/isis/citation/CBB000017416/)
Article
Winston, Andrew S.;
(1998)
“The defects of his race”: E.G. Boring and antisemitism in American psychology, 1923-1953
(/isis/citation/CBB000075746/)
Article
Burton, Gregory;
(2001)
The Tenacity of Historical Misinformation: Titchener Did Not Invent the Titchener Illusion
(/isis/citation/CBB000100113/)
Article
Stout, Dale;
(1989)
A question of statistical inference: E. G. Boring, T.L. Kelley, and the probable error
(/isis/citation/CBB000049480/)
Book
Armando, Luigi Antonello;
(1988)
L'invenzione della psicologia: Saggio sull'opera storiografica di E.G. Boring
(/isis/citation/CBB000041265/)
Article
Goodwin, C. James;
(2005)
Reorganizing the Experimentalists: The Origins of the Society of Experimental Psychologists
(/isis/citation/CBB000630715/)
Article
O'Donnell, John M.;
(1979)
The crisis of experimentalism in the 1920s: E.G. Boring and his uses of history
(/isis/citation/CBB000026824/)
Article
Alexandra Rutherford;
(2015)
Maintaining Masculinity in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Psychology: Edwin Boring, Scientific Eminence, and the “Woman Problem”
(/isis/citation/CBB415515182/)
Book
Meyer, Adolf;
Titchener, Edward Bradford;
(1989)
Defining American psychology: The correspondence between Adolf Meyer and Edward Bradford Titchener. Edited by Leys, Ruth and Evans, Rand B.
(/isis/citation/CBB000045276/)
Book
Shook, John R.;
(2001)
The Chicago School of Functionalism
(/isis/citation/CBB000102425/)
Article
Richard Staley;
(2021)
Sensory studies, or when physics was psychophysics: Ernst Mach and physics between physiology and psychology, 1860–71
(/isis/citation/CBB206423864/)
Article
Sigrid Leyssen;
(2021)
Remaking “Michotte”: Reusing and Remaking Moving Images in the History of Perception Research
(/isis/citation/CBB651176380/)
Book
Brady Wagoner;
(2017)
The Constructive Mind: Bartlett's Psychology in Reconstruction
(/isis/citation/CBB770758175/)
Article
Harry Heft;
(2022)
Visual art history and the psychology of perception: Perspectivism and its 20th century abandonment in the visual arts and in Gibson's ecological psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB849062555/)
Book
Bennett, M. R.;
Hacker, P. M. S.;
(2008)
History of Cognitive Neuroscience
(/isis/citation/CBB001250189/)
Article
Rowe, Frederick B.;
Murray, Frank S.;
(1979)
A note on the Titchener influence on the first psychology laboratory in the South
(/isis/citation/CBB000016046/)
Article
Thomas Oberdan;
(2015)
From Helmholtz to Schlick: The Evolution of the Sign-Theory of Perception
(/isis/citation/CBB465857714/)
Book
Blackmore, J.;
Itagaki, R.;
Tanaka, S.;
(2001)
Ernst Mach's Vienna 1895-1930, Or Phenomenalism as Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000101429/)
Book
Schroeder, Severin.;
(2000)
Wittgenstein and Contemporary Philosophy of Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000102193/)
Article
Sander Verhaegh;
(2021)
Psychological operationisms at Harvard: Skinner, Boring, and Stevens
(/isis/citation/CBB127918561/)
Be the first to comment!