Phemister, Pauline (Author)
Leibniz believed the ‘true concept of substance’ is found in ‘the concept of forces or powers’. Accordingly, he conceived monadic substances as metaphysically primitive forces whose modifications manifest both as monads’ appetitions and perceptions and as derivative forces in monads’ organic bodies. Relationships between substances, and in particular the ethical relationships that hold between rational substances, are also foregrounded by Leibniz’s concept of substances as forces. In section one, we discuss the derivative forces of bodies. In section two, we consider monads’ perceptions and appetitions. Section three attends to ethical aspects of Leibniz’s account, focusing in particular on souls’ representative natures and the correspondence that obtains between perceptions in one and perceptions in all others. In section four, however, I argue that Leibniz’s commitment to the doctrine of the conservation of force makes it impossible for any one substance to pursue its own advantage by increasing its active force without there being a correlative disadvantageous decrease in the active force of substances elsewhere in the universe. While the reconciliatory proposals offered do not entirely remove the tension between Leibniz’s ethics and his physics, they do soften its severity and allow it to be regarded in a more positive light.
...MoreArticle Federico Boccaccini; Anna Marmodoro (2017) Powers, Abilities and Skills in Early Modern Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (pp. 435-442).
Article Federico Boccaccini; Anna Marmodoro (2017) Powers, Abilities and Skills in Early Modern Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (pp. 435-442).
Article
Stephen Howard;
(2017)
Why Did Leibniz Fail to Complete His Dynamics?
(/isis/citation/CBB448929987/)
Article
Daniel Garber;
(2019)
La dynamique de Leibniz est-elle compatible avec sa monadologie ?
(/isis/citation/CBB392397811/)
Article
Ohad Nachtomy;
(2018)
Monads at the Bottom, Monads at the Top, Monads All Over
(/isis/citation/CBB302983768/)
Article
Paul Lodge;
(2015)
Heidegger on the Being of Monads: Lessons in Leibniz and in the Practice of Reading the History of Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB417681968/)
Article
Pierfrancesco Basile;
(2015)
Learning from Leibniz: Whitehead (and Russell) on Mind, Matter and Monads
(/isis/citation/CBB635051687/)
Article
Jeremy Dunham;
(2015)
From Habit to Monads: Félix Ravaisson's Theory of Substance
(/isis/citation/CBB734477521/)
Book
Raffaele Cirino;
(2018)
Fisica e metafisica della luce in Leibniz: la realtà tra apparenze ottiche e scienza di visione
(/isis/citation/CBB222464741/)
Book
Richard T. W. Arthur;
(2022)
Leibniz on Time, Space, and Relativity
(/isis/citation/CBB492069997/)
Article
Peter Simons;
(2015)
Bolzano's Monadology
(/isis/citation/CBB137993666/)
Article
Belkind, Ori;
(2013)
Leibniz and Newton on Space
(/isis/citation/CBB001320865/)
Article
Pauline Phemister;
Lloyd Strickland;
(2015)
Leibniz's Monadological Positive Aesthetics
(/isis/citation/CBB268974718/)
Article
Richard Mark Fincham;
(2015)
Reconciling Leibnizian Monadology and Kantian Criticism
(/isis/citation/CBB087483741/)
Book
William Boos;
Florence S. Boos;
(2018)
Metamathematics and the Philosophical Tradition
(/isis/citation/CBB060593902/)
Book
Lefèvre, Wolfgang;
(2001)
Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: Philosophy and Science in the Eighteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB000100782/)
Article
Cecilia Muratori;
(2017)
‘In Human Shape to Become the Very Beast!’ – Henry More on Animals
(/isis/citation/CBB014303409/)
Book
Look, Brandon;
(1999)
Leibniz and the “Vinculum Substantiale”
(/isis/citation/CBB000110667/)
Article
Southgate, Henry Michael;
(2013)
Kant's Critique of Leibniz's Rejection of Real Opposition
(/isis/citation/CBB001211925/)
Article
Anne-Lise Rey;
(2019)
Les enjeux métaphysiques de la dynamique
(/isis/citation/CBB019359495/)
Thesis
Peeters, Jonathan;
(2009)
The Building Blocks of Reality: Atomism in the 17th and 18th Centuries
(/isis/citation/CBB001562855/)
Article
Johns, Chris;
(2014)
Leibniz and the Square: A Deontic Logic for the Vir Bonus
(/isis/citation/CBB001550608/)
Be the first to comment!