Essay Review ID: CBB665136789

Roger Ariew and "The First Cartesians" (2018)

unapi

The book Descartes and the First Cartesians published by Roger Ariew in 2014, like the revised and expanded version of Descartes and the Last Scholastics, published in 2011 under the title Descartes Among the Scholastics, contributes in an exemplary way to eliminating the mythologization of modernity in the history of Cartesianism, and more generally, in the history of early-modern philosophy. From one book to the next, and with the help of numerous articles in the background that develop the same critique of the mythology of the modern philosopher maintained by many commentators, Ariew patiently demonstrates that what one calls "the system of the philosophy of Descartes" constitutes neither the absolute beginning of modern philosophy nor a sealed-off and strictly internally ordered totality. In this reading Ariew opposes Descartes' supposed status as radically distinct from all previous philosophies and wholly immune to historical determinations, an assumption which many interpreters have tried to impose on it. On the contrary, on Ariew's view, Descartes' philosophy should be studied as a dynamic structure shaped by its numerous relations, some involving agreement with doctrines that form the theoretical backdrop of its emergence, but others involving opposition or transformation. The methodological principle of Ariew's work erects barriers to any approach to Descartes one could call insular, approaches which propose to analyze his writings by separating them from their context under the pretext that they are the foundation of a modern philosophy. In opposition to Descartes' fictional or mythical radicality, against the idea that Descartes' thought arose in a virgin land in an intellectually empty landscape, an ambient vacuum—a view to which, in the end, a strictly internalist approach to a philosophy reduces—, Ariew affirms the reality of being rooted [End Page 548] in an historical context: there is no philosophical doctrine so radical that it is completely without roots, as he already emphasized in the preface of his collection, Descartes and His Contemporaries, published in 1995 with Marjorie Grene. This new book, Descartes and the First Cartesians, that is an evident complement to Descartes Among the Scholastics, uses the same method of analysis Ariew used in his earlier book to expose the historical connections in the so-called "system of the philosophy of Descartes." It confirms in a remarkable way what I understand as the Ariew trademark in Cartesian studies: to grasp the full meaning of the "system of the philosophy of Descartes," we must study how it depends, in its internal economy and in its ability to discover new insights, on the totality of the contemporary doctrines that constitute its sphere of initial formulation and later reception, contemporary doctrines that are in themselves heterogeneous. Evidence for the appropriateness of this approach is found in Descartes himself: in constantly soliciting his contemporaries to examine the philosophical theses he published, Descartes makes explicit how his philosophy is rooted in a context of discussion.

...More
Review Of

Book Ariew, Roger (2014) Descartes and the First Cartesians. unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB665136789/

Similar Citations

Essay Review Domenico Collacciani; (2018)
A Contextualist History of Cartesian Philosophy: Roger Ariew's Descartes and the First Cartesians (/isis/citation/CBB018190213/)

Essay Review Tad M. Schmaltz; (2018)
French Cartesian Scholasticism: Remarks on Descartes and the First Cartesians (/isis/citation/CBB407597122/)

Essay Review Sophie Roux; (2018)
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Summa quadripartita that Descartes Never Wrote (/isis/citation/CBB726490017/)

Essay Review Lucian Petrescu; (2018)
Scholastic Logic and Cartesian Logic (/isis/citation/CBB453047403/)

Article Han Thomas Adriaenssen; (2015)
The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage (/isis/citation/CBB659205412/)

Book Nolan, Lawrence; (2011)
Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate (/isis/citation/CBB001035171/)

Article Fiormichele Benigni; (2017)
Questioning Mechanism: Fénelon’s Oblique Cartesianism (/isis/citation/CBB348584037/)

Article Raftopoulos, Athanassios; (2003)
Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis (/isis/citation/CBB000340880/)

Book Schmaltz, Tad M.; (2005)
Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. (/isis/citation/CBB000640337/)

Book Schuster, John; (2013)
Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-Mathematics, Method and Corpuscular-Mechanism 1618--33 (/isis/citation/CBB001500367/)

Article Lewis, Eric P.; (2007)
Cartesianism Revisited (/isis/citation/CBB000830791/)

Book Robertson, Neil G.; McOuat, Gordon; Vinci, Thomas C.; (2007)
Descartes and the Modern (/isis/citation/CBB001035169/)

Article Kevin Jang; (2021)
Nicolaus Steno and the Cartesian Brain (/isis/citation/CBB575163588/)

Book Spallanzani, Mariafranca; (2009)
L'arbre et le labyrinthe, Descartes selon l'ordre des Lumières (/isis/citation/CBB001024869/)

Chapter Glausner, Richard; (2007)
L'impossibilité des atomes et du vide, et la théorie cartésienne des distinctions (/isis/citation/CBB001022499/)

Book Broughton, Janet; Carriero, John Peter; (2008)
A Companion to Descartes (/isis/citation/CBB001035168/)

Book Cottingham, John; (2008)
Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB000950300/)

Authors & Contributors
Schmaltz, Tad M.
Strazzoni, Andrea
Borghero, Carlo
Raftopoulos, Athanassios
Lewis, Eric P.
Cottingham, John
Journals
Perspectives on Science
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Medicina Historica
Galilæana: Journal of Galilean Studies
Publishers
Oxford University Press
Routledge
H. Champion
Blackwell Publishers
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Springer
Concepts
Cartesianism
Philosophy
Natural philosophy
Scholasticism
Philosophy of science
Mechanism; mechanical philosophy
People
Descartes, René
Ariew, Roger
Boyle, Robert
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von
Hume, David
Kant, Immanuel
Time Periods
17th century
18th century
Places
France
Europe
Netherlands
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment