After the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws of heredity in 1900, the biologists who began studying heredity, variation, and evolution using the new Mendelian methodology—performing controlled hybrid crosses and statistically analyzing progeny to note the factorial basis of characters—made great progress. By 1910, the validity of Mendelism was widely recognized and the field William Bateson christened ‘genetics’ was complemented by the chromosome theory of heredity of T. H. Morgan and his group in the United States. Historians, however, have largely overlooked an important factor in the early establishment of Mendelism and genetics: the large number of women who contributed to the various research groups. This article examines the social, economic, and disciplinary context behind this new wave of women’s participation in science and describes the work of women Mendelians and geneticists employed at three leading experimental research institutes, 1900–1940. It argues that the key to more women working in science was the access to higher education and the receptivity of emerging interdisciplinary fields such as genetics to utilize the expertise of women workers, which not only advanced the discipline but also provided new opportunities for women’s employment in science.
...MoreArticle Erik L. Peterson; Kostas Kampourakis (2015) The Paradigmatic Mendel at the Sesquicentennial of “Versuche über Pflantzen-Hybriden”: Introduction to the Thematic Issue. Science and Education (pp. 1-8).
Similar Citations
Article
Charnley, Berris;
(2013)
Experiments in Empire-Building: Mendelian Genetics as a National, Imperial, and Global Agricultural Enterprise
Article
Garland E. Allen;
(2017)
Mendelism and the Promise of A New Agriculture, 1900-1945
Article
Richmond, Marsha L.;
(2001)
Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900--1910
Book
Amir Teicher;
(2019)
Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900-1948
Article
Sally Gregory Kohlstedt;
(2022)
Collaboration, Gender, and Leadership at the Minnesota Seaside Station, 1901–1907
Book
Peter Ayres;
(2020)
Women and the Natural Sciences in Edwardian Britain: In Search of Fellowship
Article
Owens, Trevor;
(2011)
Madame Curie above the Fold: Divergent Perspectives on Curie's Visit to the United States in the American Press
Book
Kirsten Leng;
(2018)
Sexual Politics and Feminist Science: Women Sexologists in Germany, 1900–1933
Article
Annette Lykknes;
(2022)
Enabling Circumstances: Women Chemical Engineers at the Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1910–1943
Book
Freidenreich, Harriet Pass;
(2002)
Female, Jewish, and Educated: The Lives of Central European University Women
Book
Currell, Susan;
Cogdell, Christina;
(2006)
Popular Eugenics: National Efficiency and American Mass Culture in the 1930s
Chapter
Ruse, Michael;
(2010)
Evolution and the Idea of Social Progress
Article
Frederica Bowcutt;
Tamara Caulkins;
(2020)
Co-teaching Botany and History: An Interdisciplinary Model for a More Inclusive Curriculum
Article
Emily S. Hutcheson;
(2022)
A “Central Bureau of Feminine Algology:” Algae, Mutualism, and Gendered Ecological Perspectives, 1880–1910
Article
Richmond, Marsha L.;
(2006)
The “Domestication” of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895--1910
Article
Johan Schioldann;
(2023)
Classic Text No. 135: ‘On inheritance of the insanities’, by Jens Chr. Smith (1924)
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2013)
The Professor and the Pea: Lives and Afterlives of William Bateson's Campaign for the Utility of Mendelism
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
Article
Matsubara, Yoko;
(2004)
The Reception of Mendelism in Japan, 1900--1920
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Ambix: Journal of the Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry
Historia Scientiarum: International Journal of the History of Science Society of Japan
History of Psychiatry
Be the first to comment!