Although Joseph Priestley was notorious for rejecting much of orthodox Christianity and replacing it with a materialistic Unitarianism, in another respect he was an orthodox theist of his time in that he passionately upheld the Argument from Design. The Argument from Design was the heart of his “rational religion”. He contended that natural order, especially biological order, could only be successfully explained by intentional agency. At the time, however, the Argument was coming under attack, first from David Hume, then from Matthew Turner, and lastly from Erasmus Darwin. Priestley replied to each of these critics. This article surveys his replies. The three critics of the Argument contended that intelligent agency could offer only a weak explanation of natural order, that natural order is self-explanatory, or that natural mechanisms can explain biological order. Priestley in turn critiqued all three contentions, arguing that the Argument is a strong explanation; that natural order cannot be self-explanatory; and that the proposed natural explanations conflict with the empirical evidence.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Naomi Beck;
(2016)
The spontaneous market order and evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB825221730/)
Article
Marshall, Ashley;
(2007)
Erasmus Darwin contra David Hume
(/isis/citation/CBB001032681/)
Article
Flaherty, Niall O';
(2010)
The Rhetorical Strategy of William Paley's Natural Theology (1802): Part 2, William Paley's Natural Theology and the Challenge of Atheism
(/isis/citation/CBB001021664/)
Article
Romero Carrasquillo, Francisco J.;
Troyer de Romero, Hilaire K.;
(2013)
Aquinas on the Inferiority of Woman
(/isis/citation/CBB001201753/)
Article
Peterson, Gregory R.;
(2002)
The Intelligent-Design Movement: Science or Ideology?
(/isis/citation/CBB000202521/)
Article
Comfort, Nathaniel;
(2008)
Cultural Darwinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001030488/)
Article
Giuntini, Chiara;
(1985)
I poteri della natura e la scienza della mente: Joseph Priestley e Erasmus Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB000058017/)
Article
Dolan, Brian;
(2002)
Conservative Politicians, Radical Philosophers and the Aerial Remedy for the Diseases of Civilization
(/isis/citation/CBB000200124/)
Book
Elliott, Paul A.;
(2010)
Enlightenment, Modernity and Science: Geographies of Scientific Culture and Improvement in Georgian England
(/isis/citation/CBB001033259/)
Chapter
Schmaltz, Tad M.;
(2013)
Laws and Order: Malebrance, Berkeley, Hume
(/isis/citation/CBB001553041/)
Book
Huxley, Thomas Henry;
(2001)
Collected Essays of T. H. Huxley
(/isis/citation/CBB000102541/)
Article
Popkin, Richard H.;
(1977)
Joseph Priestley's criticisms of David Hume's philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB000018780/)
Article
Thomas Leinkauf;
(2020)
The ‘Book of Nature’ as Image of the Complexity and Totality of the Divine Intellect
(/isis/citation/CBB462414443/)
Article
Turner, Henry S.;
(2013)
Francis Bacon's Common Notion
(/isis/citation/CBB001200734/)
Article
List, Julia;
(2009)
Erasmus Darwin's Beautification of the Sublime: Materialism, Religion and the Reception of The Economy of Vegetation in the Early 1790s
(/isis/citation/CBB001032687/)
Book
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory;
(1999)
History of women in the sciences: Readings from Isis
(/isis/citation/CBB000110570/)
Thesis
Goldstein, Amanda Jo;
(2011)
“Sweet Science”: Romantic Materialism and the New Sciences of Life
(/isis/citation/CBB001567306/)
Article
Zeng-yi Zhang;
(2021)
Creation-Evolution Controversies in China: A Study of Intelligent Design in Social Media
(/isis/citation/CBB728221510/)
Article
Efthymios Nicolaidis;
(2021)
Creationism in Today’s Orthodox Community
(/isis/citation/CBB280566258/)
Article
Kahm, Nicholas;
(2013)
Divine Providence in Aquinas's Commentaries on Aristotle's Physics and Metaphysics, and Its Relevance to the Question of Evolution and Creation
(/isis/citation/CBB001201751/)
Be the first to comment!