In its “deliberative turn,” the field of science and technology studies (STS) has strongly advocated opening up decision-making processes around science and technology to more perspectives and knowledges. While the theory of democracy underpinning this is rarely explicitly addressed, the language and ideas used are often drawn from deliberative democracy. Using the case of synthetic biology and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), this paper looks at challenges of public engagement and finds parallels in long-standing critiques of deliberative democracy. The paper suggests that STS scholars explore other theories of decision-making and explores what an RRI grounded in agonistic pluralism might entail. An agonistic RRI could develop empirical research around questions of power relations in contemporary science and technology, seek to facilitate the formation of political publics around relevant issues, and frame different actors’ stances as adversarial positions on a political field rather than “equally valid” perspectives.
...More
Article
Nina Frahm;
Tess Doezema;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission
Article
Marjoleine G. van der Meij;
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse;
Frank Kupper;
(December 2017)
Supporting Citizens in Reflection on Synthetic Biology by Means of Video-Narratives
Article
Sara Giordano;
(May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
Article
Claire Marris;
Jane Calvert;
(2020)
Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
Book
A. Balmer;
K. Bulpin;
S. Molyneux-Hodgson;
(2016)
Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices
Article
Bruno Oliveira Martins;
(2023)
Security knowledges: Circulation, control, and responsible research and innovation in EU border management
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
Article
Noela Invernizzi;
(2020)
Public participation and democratization: Effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
Book
Christopher M. Kelty;
(2020)
The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories
Article
Stefan Laube;
Jan Schank;
Thomas Scheffer;
(April 2020)
Constitutive invisibility: Exploring the work of staff advisers in political position-making
Article
Endre Dányi;
Michaela Spencer;
(April 2020)
Un/common grounds: Tracing politics across worlds
Article
Marco Deseriis;
(2023)
Reducing the Burden of Decision in Digital Democracy Applications: A Comparative Analysis of Six Decision-making Software
Article
Jakob Raffn;
Frederik Lassen;
(2021)
Politics of Nature: The board game
Article
Hiro Saito;
(January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan
Article
Amir, Sulkiar;
(2017)
Reconstructing the Archipelago: Introduction to Special Issue
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
Article
Durant, Darrin;
(October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science
Article
Phillip H. Roth;
Tommaso Bruni;
(2022)
Participation, Empowerment, and Evidence in the Current Discourse on Personalized Medicine: A Critique of “Democratizing Healthcare”
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Jannik Schritt;
Volkan Sayman;
(February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation
Be the first to comment!