Article ID: CBB650192444

Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI (2023)

unapi

In its “deliberative turn,” the field of science and technology studies (STS) has strongly advocated opening up decision-making processes around science and technology to more perspectives and knowledges. While the theory of democracy underpinning this is rarely explicitly addressed, the language and ideas used are often drawn from deliberative democracy. Using the case of synthetic biology and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), this paper looks at challenges of public engagement and finds parallels in long-standing critiques of deliberative democracy. The paper suggests that STS scholars explore other theories of decision-making and explores what an RRI grounded in agonistic pluralism might entail. An agonistic RRI could develop empirical research around questions of power relations in contemporary science and technology, seek to facilitate the formation of political publics around relevant issues, and frame different actors’ stances as adversarial positions on a political field rather than “equally valid” perspectives.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB650192444/

Similar Citations

Article Nina Frahm; Tess Doezema; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission (/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)

Article Marjoleine G. van der Meij; Jacqueline E. W. Broerse; Frank Kupper; (December 2017)
Supporting Citizens in Reflection on Synthetic Biology by Means of Video-Narratives (/isis/citation/CBB984497768/)

Article Sara Giordano; (May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics (/isis/citation/CBB369714455/)

Article Anja Bauer; Alexander Bogner; (2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues (/isis/citation/CBB333309152/)

Book A. Balmer; K. Bulpin; S. Molyneux-Hodgson; (2016)
Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices (/isis/citation/CBB471073110/)

Article Claire Marris; Jane Calvert; (2020)
Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap (/isis/citation/CBB160780807/)

Article Durant, Darrin; (October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science (/isis/citation/CBB562394056/)

Article Stefan Laube; Jan Schank; Thomas Scheffer; (April 2020)
Constitutive invisibility: Exploring the work of staff advisers in political position-making (/isis/citation/CBB639042988/)

Article Jan-Peter Voß; Jannik Schritt; Volkan Sayman; (February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation (/isis/citation/CBB229106240/)

Article Endre Dányi; Michaela Spencer; (April 2020)
Un/common grounds: Tracing politics across worlds (/isis/citation/CBB853975487/)

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)

Article Amir, Sulkiar; (2017)
Reconstructing the Archipelago: Introduction to Special Issue (/isis/citation/CBB279887749/)

Book Christopher M. Kelty; (2020)
The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories (/isis/citation/CBB525160672/)

Article Jakob Raffn; Frederik Lassen; (2021)
Politics of Nature: The board game (/isis/citation/CBB033346411/)

Authors & Contributors
Thomas Scheffer
Alexander Bogner
Tommaso Bruni
Phillip H. Roth
Marco Deseriis
Balmer, Andrew
Journals
Social Studies of Science
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Spontaneous Generations
Science Communication
Science as Culture
Publishers
University of Chicago Press
Palgrave Macmillan
Concepts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Democracy
Expertise
Synthetic biology; bioengineering
Responsible research and innovation
Politics and government
People
Latour, Bruno
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
Modern
Places
European Union
United Kingdom
Indonesia
Netherlands
Japan
Germany
Institutions
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
European Commission
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment